Skip to main content
Log in

Deciphering the sophomore slump: changes to student perceptions during the undergraduate journey

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The second year of university is little-researched, despite being a focal point for declining performance, persistence, and satisfaction. It is important to establish appropriate methods for studying this ‘sophomore slump’ and to pinpoint specific antecedents from broad domains noted in literature (e.g. students’ social integration, perceptions of the curriculum). Using a novel methodology, 166 undergraduates were surveyed in successive years of study to derive a gold standard ‘within-subjects’ data sample. Under a replicated design, a ‘between-subjects’ sample of over 1000 students completed the same e-survey just once, in year one, two, or three. Quantitative comparison of the responses across years showed over 85% agreement between samples. This endorses between-subject approaches (i.e. simultaneously surveying students from different years) to facilitate rapid interventions that benefit students before they graduate. In terms of detailed findings, year two saw positive trends in students’ academic engagement (e.g. self-reported independent study time), social integration (e.g. feeling accepted, involvement in extra-curricular activities), and views on teaching staff (e.g. approachability). Although appraisals remained broadly favourable, there was, in contrast, significant deterioration in global perceptions of the learning atmosphere (e.g. course enjoyment), as well as specific elements of the teaching provision (e.g. contact hours, feedback). Notably, there appeared to be little progression in students’ academic self-perceptions (e.g. confidence to make presentations, enter class debates). Year two also saw increased thoughts of drop-out. These results highlight the unique character of the second year at university and indicate potential target areas for enhancing this phase of the undergraduate journey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Extended programmes, where undergraduates spend an interceding year on professional placement

  2. After exclusion of repeating students

References

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. A., & Kaye, L. K. (2014). ‘I’d be expecting caviar in lectures’: the impact of the new fee regime on undergraduate students’ expectations of higher education. Higher Education, 67(5), 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, S., Mainardes, E., & Silva, É. (2016). Expectations of higher education students: a comparison between the perception of student and teachers. Tertiary Education and Management, 22(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwent, S., & Stewart, M. (2014). Are student characteristics implicated in the ‘sophomore slump’? Liverpool John Moores University. http://secondyearexperience.ljmu.ac.uk/?page_id=1040.Accessed 6 Sept 2017.

  • Denz-Penhey, H., & Murdoch, J. C. (2009). A comparison between findings from the DREEM questionnaire and that from qualitative interviews. Medical Teacher, 31(10), 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. B. (1956). The passage through college. Journal of Social Issues, 12, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore Jr., P. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HESA (2017). Non-continuation rates summary: UK performance indicators 2015/16. Higher Education Statistics Agency. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/performance-indicators/non-continuation-summary. Accessed 9 Oct 2017

  • Hunter, M. S., Tobolowsky, B. F., Gardner, J. N., Evenback, S. E., Patengale, J. A., Schaller, M. A., Schreiner, L. A., et al. (2010). Helping sophomores succeed: understanding and improving the second-year experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishitani, T. T. (2016). Time-varying effects of academic and social integration on student persistence for first and second years in college: national data approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 18(3), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin, A., & Le Riche, P. (2009). Reconceptualising student support: from ‘support’ to ‘supportive’. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P., & Brooker, L. (2017). Demystifying the rubric: a five-step pedagogy to improve student understanding and utilisation of marking criteria. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(1), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killam, W. K., & Degges-White, S. (Eds.). (2017). College student development: applying theory to practice on the diverse campus. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. A., & Remedios, R. (2007). Do undergraduates’ motives for studying change as they progress through their degrees? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, H., & Cook, A. (2003). Mind the gap: are students prepared for higher education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabel, Z., & Britton, T. A. (2018). Leaving late: understanding the extent and predictors of college late departure. Social Science Research, 69, 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milsom, C., & Yorke, M. (2015). Defining the second year. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 14–23). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsom, C., Stewart, M., Yorke, M., & Zaitseva, E. (2015). Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J., Nixon, S., Tracy, F., Hennessy, C., Ball, E., & Dinning, T. (2017). Undergraduate student expectations of university in the United Kingdom: what really matters to them? Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301855.

  • Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2016). The 2016 Student Academic Experience Survey. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in Europe among students from under-represented groups. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Adams, J. (2012). Leaving university early: a research report from the Back on Course project. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., & A. Cashmore. (2012). Fragmented transitions: moving to the 2nd year. Proceedings STEM Annual Conference. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/jon_scott_1.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2017

  • Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: the moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soemantri, D., Herrera, C., & Riquelme, A. (2010). Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M., & Darwent, S. (2015). Psychological orientations to learning in the second year. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 39–53). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success Programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

  • Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917.

  • Watson, R. (2011). A rationale for the development of an extracurricular employability award at a British university. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(3), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, O. J., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2018). Early withdrawal from higher education: a focus on academic experiences. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1437130.

  • Webb, O. J., Wyness, L., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2017). Enhancing access, retention, attainment and progression in higher education: a review of the literature showing demonstrable impact. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, S. R. (2016). The second-year slump—now you see it, now you don’t: using DREEM-S to monitor changes in student perception of their educational environment. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206854.

  • Willcoxson, L., Cotter, J., & Joy, S. (2011). Beyond the first-year experience: the impact on attrition of student experiences throughout undergraduate degree studies in six diverse universities. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2015). Why study the second year? In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M., & Zaitseva, E. (2013). Do cross-sectional student assessment data make a reasonable proxy for longitudinal data? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 957–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M., Hoekstra, P., & Turnbull, W. (2015). Maximising the use of institutional data. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 84–103). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitseva, E., Milsom, C., & Stewart, M. (2013). Connecting the dots: using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaitseva, E., Darwent, S., & Thompson, S. (2015). Implications for student support. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 68–83). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Ms. Tricia Nash who helped administer the TLS, and respondents who contributed time to this study. Views expressed in this report, and any errors or omissions, remain the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. J. Webb.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval was granted by the host institution, a public university in Southern England.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webb, O.J., Cotton, D.R.E. Deciphering the sophomore slump: changes to student perceptions during the undergraduate journey. High Educ 77, 173–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0268-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0268-8

Keywords

Navigation