Building gender inclusivity: disentangling the influence of classroom demography on classroom participation

  • Tina R. Opie
  • Beth Livingston
  • Danna N. Greenberg
  • Wendy M. Murphy
Article

Abstract

Despite increased attention on women in business, concerns abound regarding the extent to which business schools are creating inclusive learning environments that support the leadership development of both male and female students. Using an organizational demography lens, we investigate the interactive effects of student gender, faculty gender, and classroom demography on class participation. We focus on class participation as it is essential to students’ overall learning and development especially concerning leadership. Our findings demonstrate that student and faculty demography interacts with context in unexpected ways to affect participation. Specifically, when women students are in the minority and have a female professor, they receive higher participation grades, particularly as class size decreases. The findings from this study have important implications for business school faculty and administrators as they work to build more inclusive learning environments which support all students’ development as leaders.

Keywords

Gender Faculty Participation Demography Diversity Inclusion Classroom 

References

  1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abuid, B. A. (2014). A student participation assessment scheme for effective teaching and learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 11(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, E. J., & Madden, M. (2006). Chilly classrooms for female undergraduate students: a question of method? The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 684–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altermatt, E. R., Jovanovic, J., & Perry, M. (1998). Bias or responsivity? Sex and achievement-level effects on teachers’ classroom questioning practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 516–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, D. J. (2012). Black achievers’ experiences with racial spotlighting and ignoring in a predominantly white high school. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–46.Google Scholar
  6. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: an exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24(2), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arbaugh, J. B., Bento, R., & Hwang, A. (2010). Does the MBA experience support diversity? Demographic effects on program satisfaction. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(2), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armstrong, M., & Boud, D. (1983). Assessing participation in discussion: an exploration of the issues. Studies in Higher Education, 8, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashcraft, K. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2004). Reworking gender: a feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Barry, B. (2015). The toxic lining of men’s fashion consumption: the omnipresent force of hegemonic masculinity. Critical Studies in Men’s Fashion., 2(2&3), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartunek, J. M., & Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: gender patterns in students’ choices. Gender Roles, 43, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bean, J. C., & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 74, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berdine, R. (1986). Why some students fail to participate in class. Marketing News, 20, 23–24.Google Scholar
  16. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
  17. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brady, K. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1999). Gender and gender in the college classroom: a quantitative analysis of faculty student interactions and perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 622–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Canada, K., & Pringle, R. (1995). The role of gender in college classroom interactions: a social context approach. Sociology of Education, 68, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Caspi, A., Chajut, E., & Saporta, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online discussions: gender differences. Computers & Education, 50(3), 718–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Catalyst. (2017). Pyramid: women in S&P 500 companies. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, A. R. (1976). Beyond simulation: treating the classroom as an organization. The Teaching of Organization Behavior, 2(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
  26. Cornelius, R. R., Gray, J. M., & Constantinople, A. P. (1990). Student-faculty interaction in the college classroom. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 189–197.Google Scholar
  27. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crombie, G., Pyke, S. W., Silverthorn, N., Jones, A., & Piccinin, S. (2003). Students’ perceptions of their classroom participation and instructor as a function of gender and context. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crossgrove, K., & Curran, K. L. (2008). Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. CBE Life Sciences Education, 7(1), 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: the stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Czekanski, K. E., & Wolf, Z. R. (2013). Encouraging and evaluating class participation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  32. Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2006). Non-voluntary class participation in graduate discussion courses: effects of grading and cold calling. Journal of Management Education, 30, 354–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using discussion pedagogy to enhance oral and written communication skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2010). Class participation in accounting courses: factors that affect student comfort and learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2013). Impact of cold-calling on student voluntary participation. Journal of Management Education, 37, 305–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. (2008). When social context matters: the influence of long-term and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Delaney, E. (1991). Applying geography in the classroom through structured discussions. Journal of Geography, 90(3), 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: power, status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 473–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Downey, D. B., & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: resolving the contradictions. Psychological of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ehrenberg, R. G., Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1995). Do teachers’ race, gender, and ethnicity matter? Evidence from the national educational longitudinal study of 1988. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 589–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ewens, W. (2000). Teaching using discussion. In R. Neff & M. Weimer (Eds.), Classroom communication: collected readings for effective discussion and questioning (pp. 21–26). Madison: Atwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Flynn, P. M., Cavanagh, K. V., & Bilimoria, D. (2016). Gender equality in business schools: the elephant in the room. In P. M. Flynn, K. Haynes, & M. A. Kilgour (Eds.), Integrating gender equality into business and management education (pp. 26–54). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Flynn, P. M., Haynes, K., & Kilgour, M. A. (2016). Integrating gender equality into business and management education. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fritschner, L. M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: faculty and students differ on the meaning of participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342–362.Google Scholar
  56. Galyon, C. E., Blondin, C. A., Yaw, J. S., Nalls, M. L., & Williams, R. L. (2012). The relationship of academic self-efficacy to class participation and exam performance. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 15, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gilmore, T. N., & Schnall, E. (1996). Staying alive to learning: integrating enactment with case teaching to develop leaders. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Girgrin, K. Z., & Stevens, D. D. (2005). Bridging in-class participation with innovative instruction: use and implications in a Turkish university classroom. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 42, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E., Williams, K., & Neale, M. (1996). Group composition and decision-making: how member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gupta, S., Fadil, P., & Kale, R. (2009). The influence of culture and demography on classroom participation: integrating technology into the pedagogical paradigm. International Business: Research Teaching and Practice, 3(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
  61. Harrison, N. (2008). Engaging identities in a regional university classroom. Higher Education, 56, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface and deep level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2009). A practical guide to authentic e-learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Hertenstein, J. H. (1991). Patterns of participation. In C. R. Christensen, D. A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.), Education for judgment: the artistry of discussion leadership (pp. 175–191). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hollander, J. (2002). Learning to discuss: strategies for improving the quality of class discussion. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hoppe, A., Fujishiro, K., & Heaney, C. A. (2014). Workplace racial/ethnicity similarity, job satisfaction, and lumbar back health among warehouse workers: asymmetric reactions across racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Howell, R. J. (2011). Exploring the impact of grading rubrics on academic performance: findings from a quasi-experimental, pre-post evaluation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(2), 31–49.Google Scholar
  70. Jones, K.C., Misra, J., & McCurley, K. (n.d.). Intersectionality in sociology. Retrieved from https://www.socwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/swsfactsheet_intersectionality.pdf.
  71. Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: a meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Jackson, S. E. (2006). Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Karp, D. A., & Yoels, W. C. (1976). The college classroom: some observations on the meanings of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 61(4), 421–423.Google Scholar
  75. Kelan, E., & Jones, R. D. (2010). Gender and the MBA. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ma, W. (2011). Review of the book Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future?, by C. Leathwood & B. Read. Higher Education (61, pp. 613–616).Google Scholar
  77. Marshall, L. L. (2010). An elective course in women’s health. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 17(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  78. Mayorga-Gallo, S., & Hordge-Freeman, E. (2017). Between marginality and privilege: gaining access and navigating the field in multiethnic settings. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McCabe, J. (2009). Racial and gender microaggressions on a predominantly-white campus: experiences of black, latina/o and white undergraduates. Race, Gender & Class, 16(1/2), 133–151.Google Scholar
  80. McCorkel, J., & Myers, K. (2003). What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In M. D. Lynch, A. A. Norem-Heberson, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Self-concept: advances in theory and research. Cambridge: Balinger.Google Scholar
  82. McLoughlin, L. A. (2005). Spotlighting: emergent gender bias in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: how situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: a synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pepper, M. B., & Pathak, S. (2010). Classroom contribution: what do students perceive as fair assessment? Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.Google Scholar
  89. Pichevin, M., & Hurtig, M. (1996). Describing me, describing women: sex membership salience and numerical distinctiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience: a moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rankin, S., & Reason, R. (2008). Transformational Tapestry Model: a comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  94. Rice, C. (2009). Imaging the other? Ethical challenges of researching and writing women’s embodied lives. Feminism & Psychology, 19(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: a team knowledge-based approach. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Riddle, E.J., Smith, M., & Frankforter, S.A. (2016). A rubric for evaluating student analyses of business cases. Journal of Management Education, Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916644283.
  97. Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: an extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. In A. P. Brief & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 61–79). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  100. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Salter, D. W., & Persaud, A. (2003). Women’s views of the factors that encourage and discourage classroom participation. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scantlebury, K., & Kahle, J. B. (1993). The implementation of equitable teaching strategies by biology student teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Simpson, R. (2006). Masculinity and management education: feminizing the MBA. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(2), 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sinclair, A. (1995). Sex and the MBA. Organization, 2(2), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stewman, S. (1988). Organizational demography. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  108. Tatum, H. E., Schwartz, B. M., Schimmoeller, P. A., & Perry, N. (2013). Classroom participation and student-faculty interaction: does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 84(6), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc..Google Scholar
  110. Wade, R. C. (1994). Teacher education students’ views on class discussion: implications for fostering critical reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to classroom participation: minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussions. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Williams, H., & Mean, L. (2004). Measuring gender composition in work groups: a comparison of existing methods. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 456–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management DivisionBabson CollegeBabson ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of Iowa Management and OrganizationsIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations