Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Faculty perceptions of their graduate education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies of graduate school socialization utilize samples of either current students or recent graduates. This study investigates how professors, established in their academic careers, retrospectively view their graduate training by asking and examining what deficiencies they detect from this preparatory stage. The sample is composed of academics at different stages of their careers, who work in a spectrum of institutional types in the US system of higher education. Four analytic dimensions are used to examine variation in which professors identify deficiencies in their graduate training: time (as indicated by career stage), employing institution, Ph.D. institution, and publication productivity. The findings cast additional light on socialization by suggesting how academics, differentially situated in an academic career, view their graduate education years after it has concluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55, 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S. (Ed.). (1998). The experience of being in graduate school. San Francisco, CA: Josser-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J. S. (2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 349–380). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2002a). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2002b). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. Review of Higher Education, 26, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2010). Reform efforts in STEM doctoral education: Strengthening preparation for scholarly careers. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 91–128). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 397–456). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., Lunceford, C. J., & Vanderlinden, K. E. (2005). Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. Review of Higher Education, 29, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in White: Student culture in medical school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 1009–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosk, C. L. (1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., & Baird, L. L. (2001). Preparation for professional self-regulation. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York, NY: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Kuh, C. (Eds.). (2009). Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. A., & Brucker, S. M. (2009). Educating scholars: Doctoral education in the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Stephan, P. (2001). Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science, 31, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (Eds.). (1995). Research–doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing Stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. (1975). Patterns of scientific research: A comparative analysis of research in three fields. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The stars are not enough: Scientists—Their passions and professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (2009). Lives in science: How institutions affect academic careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (2012). The sociology of academic careers: Problems and prospects. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 207–248). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: Does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? Higher Education, 58, 689–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (Eds.). (1982). An assessment of research–doctorate programs in the United States: Mathematical and physical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44, 816–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1977). The sociology of science: An episodic memoir. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., Reader, G. G., & Kendall, P. (Eds.). (1957). The student–physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E., Rudd, E., Zumeta, W., & Nerad, M. (2011). What matters for excellence in PhD programs? Latent constructs of doctoral program quality used by early career social scientists. Journal of Higher Education, 82, 535–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M., Rebecca, A., & Joseph, C. (2004). ‘So You Want to be a Professor!’ Lessons from the PhDs—Ten years later study. In Donald. H. Wulff, A. E. Austin, et al. (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate (pp. 137–158). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American Research University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F. (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, 42, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P., & Ma, J. (2005). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctoral career stage. American Economic Review, 95, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511–574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph C. Hermanowicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hermanowicz, J.C. Faculty perceptions of their graduate education. High Educ 72, 291–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x

Keywords

Navigation