Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 217–234 | Cite as

Internationalization for quality in Chinese research universities: student perspectives

  • Wanhua Ma
  • Yun Yue
Article

Abstract

China’s rapidly expanding university system aims to balance quantity and quality through a variety of measures, including internationalization. This paper employs data from a survey of 1264 students from 39 higher education institutions in order to understand students’ view on institutional approaches to internationalization. The data show that “the Project 985” universities (elite research universities in China) have used internationalization to sustain two objectives: elite education and innovative research for quality, because there are high levels of agreement on three indicators with internationalization of these universities: student and faculty mobility, internationalizing curriculum and program, and international research collaboration and partnership. In “the Project 211” universities (second-tier research universities), the data show that internationalization activities are highly related to curriculum reforms and faculty mobility. While the other degree-offering universities provide less opportunity for internationalization, the non-degree-offering institutions find their distinct way for institutional internationalization by providing more “international internship” opportunities. Our analysis also indicates that institutional internationalization is disciplinary oriented. In disciplines like law and art, students do not think that many activities are taken for internationalization by their institutions, while such disciplines as economics, management, and education have a higher level of internationalization. The paper will explain these findings in detail.

Keywords

Higher education system Chinese research universities Institutional internationalization Internationalization for quality Student perspectives 

References

  1. ACE. (2012). Mapping internationalization on U.S. campus: 2012 edition. http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/MappingInternationalizationonUSCampuses2012-full.pdf.
  2. Arum, S., & Van de Water, J. (1992). The need for a definition of international education in U.S. universities. In C. Klasek (Ed.), Bridges to the futures: Strategies for internationalizing higher education. IL: Association of International Education Administrators.Google Scholar
  3. Ayoubi, R., & Massoud, H. (2007). The strategy of internationalization in universities. International Journal of Education Management, 21(4), 339–349.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. M. (2008). Transformative training: Designing programs for culture learning. In M. A. Moodian (Ed.), Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: Understanding and utilizing cultural diversity to build successful organizations (pp. 95–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Y. L. (2002). Internationalization of higher education: History and current situation in China. Master, Xiang Tan University.Google Scholar
  6. De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative and conceptual analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Wit, H. (2009). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe. New York: IAP.Google Scholar
  8. Elkin, G., Farnsworth, J., & Templer, A. (2008). Strategy and the internationalization of universities. International Journal of Education Management, 22, 239–250.Google Scholar
  9. Elspeth, J., & De Wit, H. (2012). Globalization of internationalization: Thematic and regional reflections on a traditional concept. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/audem/v003/3.jones.pdf.
  10. EUA. (2013). Internationalisation in European higher education: European polices, institutional strategies and EUA support. Belgium.Google Scholar
  11. Fu, Z. (2008). International education in China: 30 years from economic reform and the open-door policy. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harari, M. (1992). The internationalization of the curriculum. In C. B. Klasek (Ed.), Bridges to the future: Strategies for internationalizing higher education. Pullman, WA: Washington State University’s Center for International Development.Google Scholar
  13. Hu, J. H. (2007). The progress of internationalization of curriculum in China’s universities. China Higher Education Research, 9, 69–71.Google Scholar
  14. Huang, F. T. (2003). Policy and practice of internationalization of higher education in China. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(3), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin, W. (2012). The policies of China’s higher education internationalization since the open-door policy and economic reform. Renmin University of China Education Journal (4), 29–48.Google Scholar
  16. Knight, J. (1994). Internationalisation: elements and checkpoints. Research Monograph No. 7 Ottawa: Canadian Bureau for International Education.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, J. (2003). Updated internationalization definition. International Higher Education, 33, 2–3.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, J. (2001). The MOE has taken 12 measures to strengthen undergraduate teaching. China Education Daily, p. 1.Google Scholar
  20. Maringe, F. (2008). Globalisation and internationalisation in HE: A survey of UK universities. Paper presented at the ICHEM Conference at the University of Minho, Portugal.Google Scholar
  21. Mcgowan, S., & Potter, L. (2008). The implications of the Chinese learner for the internationalization of the curriculum: An Australian perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mestenhauser, J., & Ellingboe, B. (1998). Reforming the higher education curriculum: Internationalizing the campus. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  23. MOB. (1978). Notice concerning increasing and selecting oversea students by the Ministry of Education. Beijing: Hainan Press.Google Scholar
  24. MOE. (2009). Brief statistics of international students in China. Beijing: MOE.Google Scholar
  25. Powell, C. (2004). Statement for international education week. http://state.gov/view/statements/powell.htm.
  26. Soderqvist, M. (2002). Internationalization and its management at higher education institutions: Applying conceptual, content, and discourse analysis. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
  27. UNICEF. (2000). Defining quality in education, Paper presented at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  28. Van der Wende, M. (2007). Internationalization of higher education in the OECD countries: Challenges and opportunities for the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yonezawa, A., Akiba, H., & Hirouchi, D. (2009). Japanese university leader’s perceptions of internationalization: The role of government in review and support. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for International Higher Education, Graduate School of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations