Paths for world-class universities in agricultural science
The top-ranking world-class universities in agricultural science denote those universities which are globally popular with agriculture-related subjects. The paper synthesizes the results of three different ranking scales (NTU, QS and ARWU) of top 50 universities in agriculture subject in 2013. The overlapped parts have been synchronized to derive the following four classifications: A (agricultural universities amalgamated with others to be an agricultural comprehensive university), R (agricultural universities re-named to be a comprehensive university), M (agricultural universities merged into other units to form or to be a part of a comprehensive university) and C (comprehensive university’s agricultural colleges or departments all the time). The following conclusions can be drawn: the majority (up to 94 %) of these universities are comprehensive ones (combination of R, M and C), and only 6 % of them are purely named agricultural universities; merging, renaming and comprehending are the three paths of agricultural universities’ development; and to be a world-class university, it is necessary to have more than 9 ESI 1 % advantage subjects among the following: Plant and Animal Science, Environmental Science/Ecology, Biology and Biochemistry, Clinical Medicine, Chemistry, Engineering, Agricultural Sciences, Social Sciences/General, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Pharmacology and Toxicology and Geosciences. It would be possible for specialized universities to be world-class universities in their fields by being a major concentration of teaching and research as well as extending other subjects through merging and renaming.
KeywordsWorld-class universities Agricultural science Path University ranking
We would like to acknowledge the higher education planning office of Jiangsu Province for the financed research project, the development strategy of high-level Agriculture University (Project number: B-a/2013/01/003).
- Accessed July 20, 2014.http://www.eua.be/Home.aspx
- Altbach, G. P. (2004). The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities. Accessed March 20, 2014. http://www.aaup.org
- Andrejs, R. (2013). Global university ranking and their impact, EUA report on rankings, 2013.Google Scholar
- Barbara, M. & Bjorn, S. (2009). Global perspectives of Higher Education. Accessed July 20, 2014. https://www.sensepublishers.com/media/1241-university-rankings-diversity-and-the-new-landscape-of-higher-education.pdf
- Baty, P. (2010). The world university rankings. Accessed July 10, 2013. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/410253
- Marope, P. T. M., Wells, P. J., & Hazelkorn, E. (Eds.). (2013). Rankings and accountability in higher education: uses and misuses. UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Mok, K. H. (2002). Globalization and university merging: International perspectives. In International Conference on University Merging, (pp. 6–7).Google Scholar
- Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Salmi, J., & Liu, N. C. (2011). Paths to a world-class University1. In N. C. Liu, Q. Wang & Y. Cheng (Eds.), Paths to a world-class university. Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Shin, J. C. (2013). The world-class university: Concept and policy initiatives. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 17–32). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2006). A world of difference: A global survey of university league tables. Toronto: Educational Policy Institute.Google Scholar