Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceptions of plagiarism
- 1.1k Downloads
Although Chinese university students’ perceptions of plagiarism have been extensively investigated, those of their teachers have been surprisingly under-researched. This study sought to address this gap by investigating 112 Chinese university English teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards plagiarism. While 57 participating teachers had overseas academic experience, the remaining ones received all their education in mainland China. They completed a perceptions of plagiarism survey that elicited their knowledge of several common forms of plagiarism in Anglo-American academia, perceptions of various possible causes of plagiarism, and attitudes towards plagiarism induced by different causes and plagiarism in general. The study found that the teachers reported varying knowledge of different types of transgressive textual practices, variegated perceptions of the different causes of plagiarism, but clearly punitive attitudes towards plagiarism. It also revealed significant differences between teachers with and without overseas academic experience in knowledge of and stances on plagiarism. These findings highlight the complexity of plagiarism as an intertextual phenomenon and point to the important role of cultural practices and academic socialisation in shaping perceptions of it.
KeywordsAcademic socialisation Academic writing Chinese university EFL teachers Plagiarism Transgressive intertextuality
- Angélil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
- Bloch, J. (2008). Plagiarism across cultures: Is there a difference? In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 219–230). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Bloch, J. (2012). Plagiarism, intellectual property and the teaching of L2 writing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Chandrasegaran, A. (2000). Cultures in contact in academic writing: Students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 10, 91–113.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2014). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.927850.
- Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Institute of International Education. (2013). Top 25 places of origin of international students, 2011/12-2012/13. Open doors report on international educational exchange. Retrieved 22 September 2014 from http://www.iie.org/opendoors.
- Introna, L., Hayes, N., Blair, L., & Wood, E. (2003). Cultural attitudes towards plagiarism. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
- Marshall, S., & Garry, M. (2005). How well do students really understand plagiarism? In H. Goss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 457–467). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Marshall, S., & Garry, M. (2006). NESB and ESB students’ attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2, 26–37.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism? International Journal of Educational Integrity, 4, 24–40.Google Scholar
- McGowan, U. (2010). Redefining academic teaching practice in terms of research apprenticeship. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy & A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (Vol. 33, pp. 481–489). Melbourne: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.Google Scholar
- McGowan, S., & Lightbody, M. (2008). ‘Another chance to practice’: Repeating plagiarism education for EAL students within a discipline context. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4, 16–30.Google Scholar
- Sapp, D. A. (2002). Towards an international and intercultural understanding of plagiarism and academic dishonesty in composition: Reflections from the People’s Republic of China. Issues in Writing, 13, 58–79.Google Scholar
- Song-Turner, H. (2008). Plagiarism: Academic dishonesty or ‘blind spot’ of multicultural education? Australian Universities’ Review, 50, 39–50.Google Scholar
- Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58, 89–109.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 98–105.Google Scholar