Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of faculty mobility in China

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the implementation of position appointment and contract system in China, faculty become more mobile than before in this emerging academic market, though in terms of mobility frequency and rate, they are still less active than their counterparts in the West. Using the data collected from 50 renowned research universities throughout China, this empirical study probes into the relationship between faculty members’ working perception and their mobility intention, aiming at achieving a more comprehensive understanding of the academic profession in China. It proposes (a) to figure out the relationship between faculty members’ mobility intention and their satisfaction with the internal environment within a university, and (b) to clarify which is more significant in predicting faculty members’ mobility, the internal or external organizational environment factor. Additionally, given the social background of China, we intend to examine whether western-based theories about satisfaction and mobility intentions can provide an adequate account of the phenomenon in this particular context. A most significant finding is that Chinese faculty members’ low level of satisfaction with organizational environment is operative as the “push” factor but often in a potential way and even if when the “pull” factor, better opportunities for academic development emerges, the “pull” factor can not necessarily exert apparent influence, because the parameter “region/city” where one university is located works as a precondition or the most critical cause for their mobility or stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In order to study the profession mobility, we have tried all means (institution website, resume, bibliography, interview, etc.) to collect the information about NAS members from 2005 to 2009 and set up a database to make a thorough analysis of their life course. In the database, 19.7 % of 234 valid samples never moved since their first entry into work.

  2. It is just the survey that we are going to discuss in the following part in this paper.

  3. Compared with the 5-point Likert Scale, the 7-point is more advantageous in that when the scale is treated as continuous numbers to describe the tendency, the discrimination degree of various items shown by the mean score is more salient.

  4. All those universities are members of Association of Chinese Graduate Schools (ACGS), an organization formed by the first batch of universities with graduate schools registered and authorized by Ministry of Education of Chinese government.

References

  • Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1987). Interuniversity mobility of academic scientists. American Sociological Review, 52(2),  643–652.

  • Cao, Y., Hu, C. Y., & Hu, C. Y. (2007). Gender and job mobility in postsocialist China: A longitudinal study of job changes in six coastal cities. Social Forces, 85(4), 1535–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., & McGee, R. J. (1958). The academic marketplace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., Zhang, S. B., & Peng, J. (2006). The relationship between regional factors, institutional guarantee and faculty turnover in Central China. Statistics and Decision, 12(10), 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, F. J., & Sheehan, B. A. (1997). Job satisfaction among academic staff: An international perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. S. (1967). On prestige and loyalty of university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(4), 629–642.

  • Manger, T., & Eikeland, O. J. (1990). Factors predicting staff’s intentions to leave the university. Higher Education, 19(3), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankin, R. M. (1973). Structural factors in academic mobility. The Journal of Higher Education, 44(2), 95–101.

  • Price, J. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeels, J. W., & Fairbanks, R. P. (1968). Publish or perish: An analysis of the mobility of publishing and nonpublishing economists. Southern Economic Journal, 35(1), 17–25.

  • Weiler, W. C. (1985). Why do faculty members leave a university? Research in Higher Education, 23(3), 270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. T., & Zhu, G. L. (2009). How does salary influences satisfaction of academic profession—A study based on surveyed questionnaire of faculty members? Management World, 12(3), 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Yue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, G., Yue, Y. & Niu, M. An empirical study of faculty mobility in China. High Educ 69, 527–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9789-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9789-y

Keywords

Navigation