Higher Education

, Volume 66, Issue 6, pp 773–776 | Cite as

On being an academic: A review

J. Fanghanel: Being an academic. Routledge, New York, NY, 2012
Book Review


  1. Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gonzales, L. D., & Rincones, R. (2011). Interdisciplinary scholars: Negotiating legitimacy at the core and from the margins. Journal of Further and Higher Education,. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.643772.Google Scholar
  3. Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2006). Neo-liberalism, globalization and human capital learning. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Knight, D. B., Lattuca, L. R., Kimball, E. W., & Reason, R. D. (2012). Understanding interdisciplinarity: Curricular and organizational features of undergraduate interdisciplinary programs. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rhoades, G. (2007). The Study of the academic profession. In P. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education (pp. 113–141). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  6. Rhoades, G., Kiyama, J. M., McCormick, R., & Quiroz, M. (2008). Local cosmopolitans and cosmopolitan locals: New models of professionals in the academy. The Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shulman, L. S. (2004). The Doctoral Imperative. Teaching as Community Property (pp. 220–232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teaching and Learning, Policy and LeadershipUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations