The biomedical doctorate in the contemporary university: education or training and why it matters
- 457 Downloads
The form and function(s) of doctoral education continue to be a subject of much debate by stakeholders internal and external to the university. Notable concerns driving this debate derive from a seemingly discursive array of factors including increasing student numbers, increased understanding of the economic value of doctoral graduates, capitalisation of the academic market and a focus on allocating funding using ostensibly narrow, arbitrary measures of ‘program success’ such as completion rates/time to completion, all framed by a wider debate regarding precisely what constitutes valid knowledge in contemporary society. Within the university, the biomedical sciences are one area of scholarship undergoing rapid change in this respect. One of the salient outcomes of these internal and external dialogues is the apparent transition of biomedical doctoral education towards a ‘training model’ that places increasing emphasis on rapid completion and the generation of ‘industry ready graduates’; a transition that is, potentially, occurring at the expense of the edifying and transformative aspects of biomedical doctoral education. Focusing on the effects of academic capitalisation, this paper draws on data from Australia and Europe to examine the drivers and potential effect(s) of this shift on contemporary doctoral education in the biomedical sciences. This paper acknowledges the potential benefit of contemporary developments whilst simultaneously concluding that by progressing too far towards a quantitatively assessed, industry-driven training model we risk eliminating the intellectual and societal transforming aspects of biomedical doctoral education that make graduates increasingly valuable to our economy and, just as importantly, to our society as a whole.
KeywordsEducation Learning Training doctoral PhD
MWK wishes to acknowledge the support of the Women and Infant Research Foundation (Western Australia). The authors wish to thank C. Trevitt for stimulating discussions in the course of editing this paper.
- Brien, D. L. (2008). Publish or Perish?: Investigating the doctorate by publication in writing. Retrieved 20 June, 2011, from http://www.aawp.org.au/files/Brien.pdf.
- Callaghan, J. (1976). A rational debate based on the facts. Retrieved 20 June, 2011, from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/speeches/1976ruskin.html.
- Check, E. (2007). More biologists but tenure stays static. Nature, 448(7156), 848–849.Google Scholar
- Downie, J., & Herder, M. (2007). Reflections on the commercialisation of Research conducted in public institutions in Canada. McGill Health Law Publication, 23–44.Google Scholar
- Entwistle, N. (2008). Taking stock: Teaching and learning research in higher education. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Teaching and Learning Research in Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Gumport, P. J. (2002). The future of the city of intellect. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Outlines of the philosophy of right. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.Google Scholar
- Insight Economics. (2006). Economic impact study of the CRC programme. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- Jaspers, K. (1953). The idea of The Unviersity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Kemp, D. A. (1999). Knowledge and innovation: A policy statement on research and research training. Retrieved 2011, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx.
- Leonard, D., Metcalfe, J., Becker, R., & Evans, J. (2006). Review of literature on the impact of working context and support on the postgraduate research student learning experience. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
- Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2004). The communist manifesto. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the university: Critical theory and practice. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Mill, J. S. (2008). On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146.Google Scholar
- Park, C. (2006). The end of the secret garden: Reframing postgraduate supervision. Retrieved June 17, 2011, from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/celt/celtweb/files/ChrisPark.pdf.
- Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
- Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). PhD by publication: A student’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/summaries_brochures/the_pedagogy_of_good_phd_supervision.htm. Accessed June 2011.
- The Australian Federal Government. (2009). Award course completion 2009: Selected higher education statistics. Retrieved 2011, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Publications/Pages/Students.aspx.
- The Australian National University. (2009). PhD by publication. Retrieved 20 June, 2011, from http://science.anu.edu.au/study/higher-degree-research/Policies/PhD_by_Publication_Guidelines.pdf.
- The National Health and Medical Research Council. (2011a). NHMRC 2010 project grant round highlights. Canberra, Australia: The National Health and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
- The National Health and Medical Research Council. (2011b). NHMRC Project grants funding policy for funding commencing in 2012. Canberra, Australia: The National Health and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
- The National Health and Medical Research Council. (2011c). Scholarships. Retrieved March, 2011, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/fellows/types/granttype/scholars/index.htm.
- The New Zealand Government. (2010). Student loan scheme bill. Retrieved from http://legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2010/0198/latest/DLM3179928.html.
- The University of Melbourne. (2011). PhD thesis. Retrieved March, 2011, from http://www.gradresearch.unimelb.edu.au/current/phdhbk/thesis.html.
- The University of Oxford. (2008). Education committee. Policy and guidance on research degrees. Retrieved March 2011, from http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/epsc/guidance/index.shtml.
- The University of Sydney. (2008). Postgraduate: Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Retrieved March, 2011, from http://fmweb01.ucc.usyd.edu.au/FMPro?-db=POL_Main.fp5&-lay=www&-format=/pol/pol_summary.html&-RecID=65&-find.
- The University of Western Australia. (2010a). Higher degrees by research (by thesis). Retrieved March 2011, from http://rules.handbooks.uwa.edu.au/rules/GeneralRules/Part3?childfx=on.
- The University of Western Australia. (2010b). Thesis as a series of papers. Retrieved 20 June, 2011, from http://www.postgraduate.uwa.edu.au/students/thesis/series.
- The Wellcome Trust. (2000a). Review of Wellcome Trust PhD research training: The student perspective. London, UK: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
- The Wellcome Trust. (2000b). Review of Wellcome Trust PhD training: The supervisor perspective. London, UK: Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
- University College London. (2011). Academic regulations and guidelines for research degree students. Retrieved March 2011, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/registry/acd_regs.