Wage determinants among medical doctors and nurses in Spain
- 177 Downloads
This paper examines the determination of wage rates for health professionals using three well known, and commonly used, econometric techniques: ordinary least squares, instrumental variables, and Heckman’s method. The data come from a graduate survey and the analysis focuses on a regional labor market, due to nationwide information on salaries is absent in Spain. After estimating different wage equations, the results suggest that OLS estimates are preferable. The findings show an important wage premium for medical doctors relative to nurses, but also a wage advantage for workers who are civil servants and a gender wage-gap that favors men. Although the expansion of higher education in Spain has reduced social inequalities in access, the main policy implication from this paper is that social class differences can still persist at the degree level—in the choice of degree—if students of higher socioeconomic status get a place at university in a degree of higher earnings, a fact that is corroborated in this study.
KeywordsHealth professionals Instrumental variables Heckit method Earnings differential Degree choice
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees of this paper for the useful comments and suggestions on a previous manuscript.
- Barnow, B. S., Cain, G. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1980). Issues in the analysis of selection bias. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 600.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar
- Galarneau, D. (2004). Health care professionals. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 16, 16–29.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H. (1995). LIMDEP: Version 7.0. User’s manual. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software.Google Scholar
- Halvorsen, R., & Palmquist, R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, 70, 474–475.Google Scholar
- Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
- Hill, R. C., Adkins, L. C., & Bender, K. A. (2003). Test statistics and critical values in selectivity models. In T. B. Fomby & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models: Twenty years later, advances in econometrics (Vol. 17, pp. 75–105). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Thurow, L. C. (1975). Generating inequality: Mechanisms of distribution in the U.S. economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar