An exploration into inquiry-based learning by a multidisciplinary group of higher education faculty
This manuscript describes faculty and student experiences and future activities of a multidisciplinary group of university faculty who are implementing inquiry-based learning (IBL) in their classrooms for the first time. This opportunity to implement the IBL instructional method was provided to the faculty through a grant from the university’s Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE). The goal of this paper is to provide a discussion on the implementation of IBL in the classroom and students’ responses to IBL. The multidisciplinary group was from the following disciplines: philosophy, journalism and mass communications, business and technology education, public health, civil engineering, and social work. This manuscript describes the (1) fundamentals of the CTE inquiry grant, (2) fundamentals of IBL, (3) IBL strategies and implementation, (4) students’ responses to IBL, and (5) the implications of IBL for higher education.
KeywordsCritical thinking Fundamentals of inquiry Inquiry-based learning Multidisciplinary faculty Problem-based learning
Funding provided by the University of South Carolina Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE). The authors thank Dr. Jed S. Lyons (CTE Faculty Director) and Ms. Ruth Patterson (CTE Program Manager) for supporting this project. Dr. Caicedo acknowledges the National Science Foundation Class Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement grant DUE-0633635 for their partial support. Drs. Besley, Friedman, and Weinberg acknowledge the University of South Carolina Honors College for supporting interdisciplinary course development. Dr. Freeman acknowledges the University of South Carolina Honors College for supporting study abroad course development.
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean ethics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Boal, A. (2000). Theater of the oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Community of Informatics Initiative (CII). (n.d.). Inquiry based learning cycle. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://www.inquiry.uiuc.edu/.
- Cowan, J. (2006). On becoming an innovative University teacher (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Day, J., Foley, J., Groeneweg, R., & van der Mast, C. (2004). Enhancing the classroom learning experience with Web lectures. Georgia Institute of Technology, GVU Technical Report, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/Projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/chapter12.html.
- Fogg, P. (2001). A history professor engages students by giving them a role in the action. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, A12.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
- Havasy, R. A. D. (2001). Getting a clue. Education Week, 21, 49.Google Scholar
- Kirshner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malacinski, G. M. (2003). Student-oriented learning: An inquiry-based developmental biology lecture course. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47, 135–140.Google Scholar
- Maiorana, V. P. (1999). Thinking across the curriculum: Building the analytical classroom. Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/24/2d/fa.pdf.
- National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/ch2.html.
- Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, E. T., & Christinan, W. (1999). Just in time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Rivers, D. B. (2002). Using a course-long theme for inquiry-based laboratories in a comparative physiology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 26, 317–326.Google Scholar
- Satir, V., Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
- Sincero, P. (2006). What is inquiry-based learning? Retrieved August 14, 2007, from http://www.inquirylearn.com/Inquirydef.htm.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfer, T. A., Freeman, M. L., & Rhodes, R. (2001). Developing and teaching an MSW capstone course using case methods of instruction. Administration in Social Work, 2, 156–171.Google Scholar
- Yoshina, J. M., & Harada, V. H. (2007). Involving students in learning through rubrics. Library Media Connection, 53, 10–14.Google Scholar