Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 59, Issue 5, pp 615–626 | Cite as

Staff conceptions of curricular and extracurricular activities in higher education

  • Sue Clegg
  • Jacqueline Stevenson
  • John Willott
Article

Abstract

This paper explores conceptions of curricular and extracurricular in UK higher education. Reporting on a case study of staff understandings of the extracurricular we argue that our data highlight the lack of debate about curricular matters. We found that there was considerable blurring of boundaries in conceptions of the curricular and extracurricular and argue that this is related to the lack of any stable or explicit conception of the curriculum in UK higher education. The paper highlights issues of recognition and non-recognition of the sorts of cultural capital which flow from traditional and other forms of extracurricular activities (ECA) and points to the continued gendering of caring and its valuing. Recognition of capital from within diverse communities and derived from activities which have not been traditionally conceptualised as ECA might contribute to graduate outcomes, but there are limitations to a politics of recognition. We argue that account also needs to be taken of the materiality of student lives and the constraints they face.

Keywords

Extracurricular activities Curricular Cultural capital Staff conceptions Gender 

References

  1. Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, theory research, critique. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Blasko, Z. (2002). Key skills; the graduate perspective. In Higher Education Digest: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  7. Chia, Y. M. (2005). Job offers of multi-national accounting firms: The effects of emotional intelligence, extra-curricular activities, and academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 75–93.Google Scholar
  8. Clegg, S. (2008a). Academic identities under threat. British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clegg, S. (2008b). Femininities/masculinities and a sense self—Thinking gendered academic identities and the intellectual self. Gender and Education, 20(3), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clegg, S., & Bradley, S. (2006). Models of personal development: Practices and processes. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, S., Stevenson, J., & Willott, J. (2008). Extending conceptualisations of the diversity and value of extracurricular activities: A cultural capital approach to graduate outcomes. Final report submitted to the HEA (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  12. Darder, A., & Torres, R. D. (2002). The critical pedagogy reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. David, M., & Clegg, S. (2008). Power, pedagogy & personalisation in global higher education: The occlusion of second wave feminism? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(4), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. McWilliam, E. (2004). Changing the academic subject. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McWilliam, E. (2007). Managing ‘nearly reasonable’ risk in the contemporary university. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mirza, H. (2006). The In/visible journey: Black women’s life-long lessons in higher education. In C. Leathwood & B. Francis (Eds.), Gender and life long learning: Critical feminist engagements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stevenson, J., & Clegg, S. (2009). Possible selves: Students orientating themselves towards the future through extracurricular activity, British Educational Research Journal (Under Review).Google Scholar
  20. Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.). (2003). Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is and what it is not. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/tla/employability/id116_employability_in_higher_education_336.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2008.
  22. Yorke, M., Knight, P. T. (2006). Embedding employability into the curriculum. In Learning & Employability Series 1. York: ESECT/HEA.Google Scholar
  23. Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research into Higher EducationLeeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations