Gender and the 2003 Quality Reform in higher education in Norway
- 260 Downloads
The Bologna Process in Europe aims to develop a coherent and compatible European higher educational system. In Norway, the Quality Reform in 2003 was the first step on implementing the Bologna Process. Internal quality assurance systems have produced several publications on internal indicators, such as student progress and teaching staff work loads, of the Quality Reform. To our knowledge, possible gender differences of these changes have yet to be evaluated. We therefore analyzed data on grades from the University of Oslo before and after the Quality Reform with regard to gender differences. Data on examinations from 1990 to spring 2007 (495,334 examinations) were analyzed using relative percentage graphs. The results show that female students have benefited more than males from the change of system: for several disciplines, male average grades were better than female average grades before the change, and female average grade were better than male average grades after the change. Male students show greater intrasex variability both before and after the introduction of the Quality Reform.
KeywordsGender differences Intrasex variability The Quality Reform Relative percentage graphs University grades University of Oslo
European course credit transfer system
Undergraduate level (Bachelor)
Graduate level (Master)
The faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of data acquired from LIST ved Studieseksjonen, University of Oslo, Norway. The technical assistance with computer programming by Knut Petter Lehre (University of Oslo, Norway) is greatly appreciated.
- Aamodt, P. O. (2007). Kvalitetsreformen under lupen. Uniped Tidsskrift for universitets-og høyskolepedagogikk, 30(3), 4–14.Google Scholar
- Allegre, C., Berlinguer, L., Blackstone, T., Ruttgers, J. (1998). Sorbonne joint declaration: Joint declaration on harmonisation of the architecture of the European higher education system. 1–3. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/Sorbonne_declaration.pdf.
- Børing, P. (2004). Studiegjennomføring og studiefrafall på høyskolene. NIFU skriftsserie 15. Oslo: NIFU.Google Scholar
- Bostad, I., Strand, L.J., Myhre, A., Handal, G., Kjeldstadli, K., Mollestad, K. (2007). Underveis (UiOs interne evaluering av kvalitetsreformen) 1–96. Retrieved March 28, 2007 from http://www.admin.uio.no/prosjekter/kvalitetsreformen/evaluering/rapport_evaluering_kvalitetsreformen_2007.pdf.
- Bourke, T. (2005). Guide to the Bologna Process: The UK HE Europe Unit, 1–40. Retrieved June 26, 2007 from http://www.europeunit.ac.uk/resources/Guide%20to%20the%20Bologna%20Process.pdf.
- Clemet, C. (2004). The Bologna Process from a Norwegian Perspective—towards a European Higher Education Area, 1–14. Retrieved December 16, 2007 from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/Norway/04101Fact_Sheet_Bologna-Process.pdf.
- Dysthe, O. (2007). Pedagogiske endringar etter Kvalitetsreforma og konsekvensar for laering. Utfordringar og strategiar vidare. Uniped, 30(3), 29–44.Google Scholar
- Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84.Google Scholar
- Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, (August), 1049–1074. doi: 10.1162/00335530360698496.
- Hanestad, B.R. (2006). Lupen, 1–42. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://www.uib.no/ua/studiekvalitet/kvalitetssikring/lupen-sluttrapport.pdf.
- Hovdhaugen, E., Aamodt, P.O. (2006). Evaluering av kvalitetsreformen. Delrapport 3: Studiefrafall og studiestabilitet. 1–96. Retrieved October 10, 2008 from http://www.nifustep.no/norsk/publikasjoner/studiefrafall_og_studiestabilitet.
- Kunnskapsdepartementet (2007) Bologna-prosessen, 1–4. Retrieved June 26, 2007 from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/UH/Bologna/Faktaark_Bologna1.pdf.
- Lehre, A.C., Lehre, K.P., Laake, P., Danbolt, N.C. (2009). Greater intrasex variability in males than in females is a fundamental aspect of gender differences in humans. Developmental Psychobiology. doi: 10.1002/dev.20358.
- Masson, A. M., Cadot, M., & Ansseau, M. (2003). Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism. L’Encephale, 29(2), 125–135. (abstract).Google Scholar
- Masson, A. M., Hoyois, P., Cadot, M., Nahama, V., Petit, F., & Ansseau, M. (2004). Girls are more successful than boys at university. Gender group differences in models integrating motivational and aggressive components correlated with test-anxiety. L’Encephale, 30((1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(04)95410-3. (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Michelsen, S., Aamodt, P.O. (2006). Kvalitetsreformen moeter virkeligheten (Delrapport 1), 1-162. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://nifustep.no/norsk/publikasjoner/kvalitetsreformen_moeter_virkeligheten.
- The American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1998). Gender Gaps. Where schools still fail our children. 1-28. Retrieved August 12, 2007 from http://www.aauw.org/research/upload/GGES.pdf.
- The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999, 1–6. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/bologna_declaration.pdf.
- Tuckman, B. W. (1996). The relative effectiveness of incentive motivation and presubscribed learning strategies in improving college students’ course performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 197–210.Google Scholar
- Willingham, D. T. (2002). Allocating student time: “Massed” versus “distributed” practice. American Educator, 26(2), 37–39.Google Scholar