Higher Education

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 659–684 | Cite as

The involvement of university faculty members in social planning: motivating and hindering factors



The research examines factors that affect the involvement of university faculty members in social planning activities. It examines the impact of philanthropic views compared with the exchange relations approach, both on personal and organizational levels, as well as the contribution of several characteristics of the relationship between faculty members and institutions.


Academia University Faculty members Social planning Community 


  1. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amey, M. J., Brown, D. F., & Sandmann, L. L. (2002). A multidisciplinary collaborative approach to a university-community partnership. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 7(3), 19–26.Google Scholar
  3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.Google Scholar
  4. Arthur, J. (1998). Communitarianism: What are the implications for education? Educational Studies, 24(3), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, A. E. (2003). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., & Jourdan, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Beito, D. T., Gordon, P., & Tabarrok, A. (2002). The voluntary city: Choice, community and civil society. Ann Arbor and Oakland, CA: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bensimon, E. M. (1993). New presidents’ initial actions: Transactional and transformational leadership. Journal for Higher Education Management, 8(2), 5–17.Google Scholar
  11. Bensimon, E. M., Polkinghorne, D. E., Bauman, G. L., & Vallego, E. (2004). Doing research that makes a difference. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 104–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, M. J., Portney, E. K., & Thomas, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban politics. Washington: The Brooking Institution.Google Scholar
  13. Bess, J. L. (1997). The motivation to teach: Perennial conundrums. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and linking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1998). Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Boehm, A. (2002a). Participation strategies of activists-volunteers in the life cycle of community crisis. The British Journal of Social Work, 32, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boehm, A. (2002b). Corporate social responsibility: A complementary perspective of community and corporate leaders. Business and Society Review, 107(2), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boehm, A., & Litwin, H. (1999). Measuring rational and organizational-political planning activities of community organization workers. Journal of Community Practice, 6(4), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyle, M. E. (2004). Walking our talk: Business schools, legitimacy, and citizenship. Business and Society, 43(1), 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revised: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, J. D., & Keeping, L. M. (2005). Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bryson, J. M. (2000). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Burtonwood, N. (1998). Liberalism and communitarianism: A response to two recent attempts to reconcile individual autonomy with group identity. Educational Studies, 24(3), 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Button, M., & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 33(4), 17–32.Google Scholar
  26. Cartwright, T. J. (1987). The lost art of planning. Long Range Planning, 20(2), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Checkoway, B. (1987). Political strategy for social planning. In F. Cox, et al. (Eds.), Strategies of community organization (pp. 326–343). Itasca, IL: Peacock.Google Scholar
  28. Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American Research University. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Churchman, A., & Sadan, E. (2003). Participation: A second view. In A. Churchman & E. Sadan (Eds.), Participation: Your way to make a difference (pp. 273–291). Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  30. Clark, B. R., & Boyer, E. L. (1990). The academic life: Small worlds, different world. New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement Teaching.Google Scholar
  31. Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1987). Social exchange theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 33(3), 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Damianand, K. E., & Becker, B. (1999). Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Washington: William Start Architectural Books.Google Scholar
  34. Dewar, M. E., & Issac, C. B. (1998). Learning from difference: The potentially transforming experience of community-university collaboration. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(4), 334–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dimova-Cookson, M. (2005). Internalism and externalism in ethics applied to the liberal-communitarian debate. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(1), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. New York: Crown Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Etzioni, A. (2003). Organ donation: A communitarian approach. Kennedy Institution Ethics Journal, 13(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ewert, G. D. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview of the influence of Habermas on educational literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1998). Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and social capital in comparative perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(10), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franklin, J. (2000). What’s wrong with new labor politics? Feminist Review, 66(1), 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fries, R. (2003). Civil society and the public good: Towards a new legal and regulatory framework. London: Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  43. Gilboa, E. (2000). Urban democracy: Civic participation in Haifa. Doctoral thesis, University of Haifa, Hebrew.Google Scholar
  44. Green, D. M. (2003). Self-efficacy: A communication model for the development of self-efficacy in the classroom. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grineski, S. (2003). A university and community-based partnership: After-school mentoring for low-income youth. School Community Journal, 13(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
  46. Groak, C. J., & McCall, R. B. (1996). Building successful university-community human service agency collaborations. In C. D. Fisher, J. P. Murray, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Applied developmental science: Graduate training for diverse disciplines and educational settings (pp.237–251). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hargens, L. L., & Long, J. S. (2002). Demographic inertia and women’s representation among faculty in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harris, M., Katz, Y., Doron, G., & Woodlief, A. (1997). Ideology and privatization policy in Israel. Environment and Planning A—Government and Policy, 15, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heshusius, L., & Ballard, K. (1996). From positivism to interpretivism and beyond: Tales of transformation in educational and social research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hoffer, R. (1994). Corporatism, pluralism, and interest group influence. Governance, 7, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones, S. R. (2002). Intersecting identities in qualitative research. Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kaas, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust, and non-institutional political participation in Western Europe. West European Politic, 22(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klein, K. (2000). Fundraising for social change. Inverness, CA: Chardon.Google Scholar
  57. Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Interactive decision making and representative democracy: Institutional collisions and solutions. In O. Van Haffen, W. J. M. Kickert, & J. J. A. Thomassen (Eds.), Governance in modern society (pp. 114–124). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Kobayashi, J., & Suzuki, M. (1988). A multilevel analysis of the factors facilitating citizen participation in community crime prevention. Reports of the National Research Institute of Police Science, 39(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
  59. Ladd, E. C., & Lipset, S. M. (1975). The divided academy: Professions and politics. New York: McGrow Hill.Google Scholar
  60. Lauffer, A. (1987). Social planners and social planning in the U.S. In F. Cox, et al., (Eds.), Strategies of community organization. Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Laverack, G., & Labonte, R. (2000). A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Lindblum, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lindon, J., Robison, A., Schmid, A., & Siles, M. E. (2002). Is social capital really capital? Review of Social Economy, 60(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lynton, E. A. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  68. Macduff, N., & Netting, F. E. (2000). Lessons learned from a practitioner-academician collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marcovich, S. (2003). Factors of corporate social responsibility manifest in financial donations, voluntarism, and participation in planning process in the community. Master’s thesis, University of Haifa, Hebrew.Google Scholar
  70. Martin, B., & Richards, E. (1995). Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision-making. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 506–526). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mcmillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Midgley, J. (1998). Social development: The development perspective in social welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Milbrath, L. W. & Goel, M. L. (1977). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally College Publication.Google Scholar
  75. Mouritsen, P. (2003). What’s the civil in civil society? Robert Putnam, Italy and the republican tradition. Political Studies, 51(4), 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Neumann, A., & Terosky, A. L. P. (2007). To give and to receive: Recently tenured professors’ experiences of service in major research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 282–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Newton, K. (1999). Social and political trust in established democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (p. 185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 election study. American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nocon, H., Nilsson, M., & Cole, M. (2004). Spiders, firesouls, and little fingers: Necessary magic in university-community collaboration. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(3), 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  81. Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  82. Nye, J., Joseph, S., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  83. O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as a scholarship for promotion and tenure. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  84. Peled, Y., & Ophir, A. (2000). Introduction. In Y. Peled & A. Ophir (Eds.), From mobilization to civic society. Jerusalem: Van Leer (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  85. Pettersen, A. R., & Rose, E. L. (1996). Participation in local politics in Norway: Some do, some don’t; some will, some won’t. Political Behavior, 18, 51–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pintrich, R. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1995). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  87. Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organization commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Posnett, J., & Jan, S. (1996). Indirect cost in economic evaluation: The opportunity cost of unpaid inputs. Health Economics, 5(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pretty, N. G. (1998). Participatory learning in rural Africa. In H. F. Coenen, D. Huitama, & J. L. O’toole (Eds.), Participation and the quality of environmental decision making (pp. 251–266). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. Putnam R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  91. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: Americas declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(10), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
  93. Quazi, A. M. (1997). Corporate social responsibility in diverse environments: A comparative study of managerial attitudes in Australia and Bangladesh. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 16(4), 67–85.Google Scholar
  94. Ray, B. (2003). Social planning: past, present, and future. Journal of International Development, 15(7), 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Raymond, D. (2004). Being ‘business-like’ in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rosenhek, Z. (2004). Social policy and the nation-building: The dynamics of the Israeli Welfare State. Journal of Societal & Social Policy, 1(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
  97. Russell, B. H. (2000). Social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  98. Samier, E. (2002). Education between states, markets, and civil society: Comparative perspectives. Educational Management and Administration, 30(2), 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sargeant, A., & Kähler, J. (2003). Returns on fundraising expenditures in the voluntary sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  101. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Educating the reflective practitioner for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  102. Schriver, J. M. (2000). Human behavior and social environment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  103. Selznic, P. (1995). Thinking about community: Ten theses. Society, 32(5), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  105. Smismans, S. (2003). European civil society: Shaped by discourses and institutional interests. European Law Journal, 9(40), 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Smith, P. D., & Propst, D. B. (2001). Are topic-specific measures of socio-political control justified? Exploring the realm of citizen participation in natural resource decision making. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Staples, L. (2004). Roots for power: A manual for grassroots organizing. Wesport, CN: Praeger.Google Scholar
  108. Steiner, D. (2002). Moral and political education/making good citizens: Education and civil society. Journal of Education, 183(1), 101–123.Google Scholar
  109. Stephanos, P. (1999). Universities, the social sciences, and civil society. Higher Education in Europe, 24(4), 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Suarez-Blacazar, Y., Harper, G. W., & Lewis, R. (2005). An interactive and contextual model of community-university collaborations for research and action. Health Education and Behavior, 32(1), 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Turner, J. H., & Turner, P. R. (1998). The structure of sociological theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  112. Wandersman, A. (1981). A framework of participation in community organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wang, X. (2001). Assessing public participation in U.S. cities. Public Performance and Management Review, 24(4), 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass & the Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  115. Wardell, F., Lishman, J., & Whalley, L. J. (2000). Who volunteers? British Journal of Social Work, 30(2), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. York, A. S., & Itzhaki, H. (1991). How can we measure the effects of client participation on the effectiveness of social work intervention? The British Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 647–662.Google Scholar
  118. Zilberfarb, B. Z. (2005). From socialism to free market: The Israeli economy, 1948–2003. Israel Affairs, 11(1), 12–22.Google Scholar
  119. Ziman, J. (2003). Non-instrumental roles of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Welfare and Health SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations