Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is higher education in really ‘internationalising’?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a widely accepted maxim that, like business generally, higher education is globalising. For many countries, higher education is now an important export sector, with university campuses attracting international students from around the world. Licensing production, in the form of franchising degree provision to international partners, is beginning to mutate into foreign direct investment as many universities set up campuses in other countries. While there are clearly parallels between the globalisation of business and higher education, this paper examines the supply- and demand-side drivers within the university sector. It argues that an alignment of special factors, rather than an inexorable trend towards commercialisation, has caused the recent internationalisation of higher education and concludes that current trends are unsustainable in the medium-term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Knight (2005) for a useful review of terms in international higher education and well as definitional difficulties with the concept of ‘international’ students.

  2. http://www.uopxonline.com/aboutus.asp

  3. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/ou/p3.shtml

  4. http://www.moe.edu.cn/english/laws_r.htm

  5. http://www.unswasia.edu.sg/about/about.html

  6. http://www.unswasia.edu.sg/about/about.html

  7. The business model for franchises often fails to fully cost the time of managers on the home campus who are charged with quality assurance or include a realistic premium for the risk faced by the home university; on this basis, the total costs of a franchise with the attendant principal agent problems can sometimes be much higher than the direct costs appear.

  8. http://www.yawningbread.org/apdx_2005/imp-226.htm

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (2002). Knowledge and education as international commodities: The collapse of the common good. International Higher Education, 28, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalization and the university: myths and realties in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Universities Quality Agency. (2005). Annual report, http://www.auqa.edu.au/aboutauqa/annualreports/2005_Annual_Report.pdf.

  • BBC. (2006). Britain and the Chinese “sea-turtles”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/5109446.stm.

  • Bloom, D. E., & Sevilla J. (2003). Difficulties in justifying general public subsidies for higher education in developing countries, International Higher Education, No 32, Summer, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/News32/Newslet32.htm.

  • British Council. (2004). Vision 2020: Forecasting international student mobility (a UK perspective). Universities UK: British Council and IDP Education Australia.

  • Chich-Jen, S., & I-Ming, W. (2006). Development of export of China’s higher education, http://cnx.org/content/m14289/latest/China.pdf.

  • Council of Europe/UNESCO. (2000). Code of good practice in the provision of transnational education. Lisbon: Council of Europe/UNESCO.

  • Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. Higher education funding–international comparisons, http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/uploads/HEfunding_internationalcomparison.pdf.

  • Dunning, J. (1988). Explaining international production. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1993). The globalization of business: The challenge of the 1990s. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. (2005). The Global Education Index 2005 (Part 2): Public companies relationships with non-profit higher education. London, UK: The Observatory on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Wynyard, R. (Eds.) (2002). The McDonaldization of higher education. Wesport, CT: Praeger.

  • Hira, A. (2003). The brave new world of international education. The World Economy, 26(6), 911–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDP. (2003). Global student mobility 2025 series: Analysis of global competition and market share. Australia: IDP Education Australia Limited.

  • Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1998). Reaping the benefits: defining the public and private value of going to college. The New Millennium Project on Higher Education Costs, Pricing, and Productivity, Washington.

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne J. E. (1977). The internationalisation process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalisation of the firm: Four Swedish cases. The Journal of Management Studies, October.

  • Kemp, N. (2004). The global market for higher education in business and management (1): trends and forecasts. European associate for international education 16th annual conference, Torino.

  • Knight, J. (2002). Trade in higher education services: the implication of GATS. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, London, UK.

  • Knight, J. (2005). Borderless, offshore, transnational and cross-border education: definition and data dilemmas. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, London, UK.

  • Marcucci, P. N., & Johnstone, D. B. (1993). Tuition policies in a comparative perspective: theoretical and political rationales. 28th annual conference of the american education finance association (updated version available at: http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/org/inthigheredfinance/Publications/Tuition%20paper%5B1%5D.rev.pdf).

  • Mazzarol, T. & Soutar, G. N. (2002). “Push-pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2/3), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G. N., & Seng, M. S. Y. (2003). The third wave: future trends in international education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(2/3), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins Committee. (1963). Higher education, HMSO, Cmnd. 2154-VI to VIII.

  • Scott, G., & Scott, H. (2005). A longitudinal study of New Zealand university income and student numbers. New Zealand Journal of Tertiary Education Policy, 1(2). Available at http://www.aus.ac.nz/.

  • Scott, P. (Ed.). (1998). The globalization of higher education. UK: Open University Press.

  • Spilimbergo, A. (2006). Democracy and foreign education. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5934.

  • Teferra, D. (1997). Brain drain of African scholars and the role of studying in the United States. International Higher Education, 7, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2005). Survey: Higher education, the brains business. The Economist, September 8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel M. Healey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healey, N.M. Is higher education in really ‘internationalising’?. High Educ 55, 333–355 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9058-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9058-4

Keywords

Navigation