Higher Education

, 52:421 | Cite as

Delayed Understanding and Staying in Phase: Students’ Perceptions of their Study Situation

  • Max Scheja


Findings are presented from a study of undergraduate students’ experiences of understanding in first-year engineering. At the end of their first year of study 86 Swedish students of electrical engineering and computer science were asked to reflect in writing on their experiences of studying and learning. Fifteen of them also took part in interviews which explored in some detail their experiences of understanding in relation to perceived constraints of the teaching-learning environment. The analyses of the students’ written accounts and the interview data focused on the students’ experiences of studying and of understanding in relation to course work in engineering. The majority of the students reported problematic first-year experiences and testified to a sensation of ‘falling out of phase’ with their studies. This sensation was frequently coupled with a lag in coming to understand course material, which may be characterised in terms of delayed understanding. The notion of delayed understanding is discussed in relation to ideas about students’ perceptions of the learning environment and the impact that those perceptions might have on students’ opportunities to reflect on learning material and develop a solid understanding of course material in engineering education. In conclusion, it is suggested that the the notion of delayed understanding captures the complications of a study situation in which a perceived lack of time to reflect on learning material obstructs students’ understanding of course material in engineering, and also points up a more general aspect of learning observing that time to reflect on previous experiences is an essential component of the process of coming to understand learning material in a particular educational setting.


delayed understanding engineering education perceptions of the teaching-learning environment staying in phase student learning time for reflection 


  1. Booth, S., Wistedt, I., Halldén, O., Martinsson, M., Marton, F. 1999‘Paths of learning. The joint constitution of insights’Burton, L. eds. Learning Mathematics – from Hierarchies to NetworksFalmer PressLondon6283Google Scholar
  2. Bowden, J., Marton, F. 1998The University of LearningKogan PageLondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Case, J., Gunstone, R. 2003‘Going deeper than deep and surface approaches: A study of students’ perceptions of time’Teaching in Higher Education85569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. 1938Experience and EducationThe Macmillan CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Downes, W. 1998Language and Society2Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Driver, R. 1981‘Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science’European Journal of Science Education393101Google Scholar
  7. Driver, R., Easley, J. 1978‘Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students’Studies in Science Education56184Google Scholar
  8. Duit R. (2004). Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education. Retrieved on 2 December 2004 from University of Kiel, Liebniz Institute for Science Education Website: Scholar
  9. Duit, R., Roth, W-M., Komorek, M., Wilbers, J. 2001‘Fostering conceptual change by analogies – between Scylla and Charybdis’Learning and Instruction11283303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eizenberg, N. 1988‘Approaches to learning anatomy: Developing a program for pre-clinical medical students’Ramsden, P. eds. Improving Learning: New PerspectivesKogan PageLondon178198Google Scholar
  11. Entwistle, N. 1995‘Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations’Educational Psychologist394754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Entwistle N. (2003). ‘University teaching-learning environments and their influences on student learning: An introduction to the ETL-project’, Paper Presented within the Symposium Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments to Improve Student Learning at the 10th EARLI-Conference, Padua 26–30 August 2003 Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: Scholar
  13. Entwistle, A., Entwistle, N. 1992‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’Learning and Instruction2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Entwistle, N., Entwistle, A. 1997‘Revision and the experience of understanding’Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh145155Google Scholar
  15. Entwistle, N., Entwistle, D. 2003‘Preparing for examinations: The interplay of memorising and understanding, and the development of knowledge objects’Higher Education Research and Development221942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Entwistle N., Hounsell D., Macaulay C., Situnayake G., Tait H. (1989). The Performance of Electrical Engineering Students in Scottish Higher Education. University of Edinburgh: Department of Education and TLA Centre.Google Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N., Marton, F. 1994‘Knowledge objects: Understandings constituted through intensive academic study’British Journal of Educational Psychology64161178Google Scholar
  18. Entwistle N., McCune V. (in press). ‘The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories’, Educational Psychology Review 16(4), 325–345.Google Scholar
  19. Entwistle N., Nisbet J., Bromage A. (2004). ‘Teaching-learning environments and student learning in electronic engineering’, Paper Presented at the Third Workshop of the European Network on Powerful Learning Environments, Brugge, 30 September–2 October 2004. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: Scholar
  20. Fransson, A. 1977‘On qualitative differences in learning IV. Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome’.British Journal of Educational Psychology47244257Google Scholar
  21. Halldén, O. 1999‘Conceptual change and contextualisation’Schnotz, W.Vosniadou, S.Carretero, M. eds. New Perspectives on Conceptual Change HillsdaleErlbaumNJ5365Google Scholar
  22. Halldén, O., Petersson, G., Scheja, M., Ehrlén, K., Haglund, L., Österlind, K., Stenlund, A. 2002‘Situating the question of conceptual change’Limon, M.Mason, L. eds. Reconsidering Conceptual change – issues in Theory and PracticeKluwerDordrecht137148Google Scholar
  23. Helmstad G. (1999). Understandings of Understanding. An Inquiry Concerning Experiential Conditions for Developmental Learning. Goteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Department of Education, Gothenburgh University. (Doctoral diss.).Google Scholar
  24. Kvale, S. 1989‘To validate is to question’Kvale, S. eds. Issues of Validity in Qualitative ResearchStudentlitteraturLund7392Google Scholar
  25. Lavoie D.R. (1997). ‘Using a modified concept mapping strategy to identify students’ alternative scientific understandings of biology’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Chicago, Illinois, 21–24 March, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. Marton, F., Säljö, R. 1976a‘On qualitative differences in learning I. Outcome and process’.British Journal of Educational Psychology46411Google Scholar
  27. Marton, F., Säljö, R. 1976b‘On qualitative differences II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task’British Journal of Educational Psychology46115127Google Scholar
  28. Marton, F., Säljö, R. 1997‘Approaches to learning’Marton, F.Hounsell, D.Entwistle, N. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh3958Google Scholar
  29. McCune V. (2003). ‘Promoting high-quality learning: perspectives from the ETL project’, Paper Presented at the Norwegian Network in Higher Education 14th Conference on University and College Pedagogy, Fredrikstad, 22–23 October 2003. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: Scholar
  30. Nisbet J., Entwistle N., McQuillion B., Robinson I. (2004). ‘Staff and student perceptions of the teaching-learning environment: A case study’, Paper Presented at the University of Wolverhampton/LTSN/BEES International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education, Wolverhampton, 7–9 June 2004. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: Scholar
  31. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., Gertzog, W.A. 1982‘Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change’Science Education66211227Google Scholar
  32. Ramsden, P. 1992Learning to Teach in Higher EducationRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramsden, P. 1997‘The context of learning in academic departments’Marton, F.Entwistle, N.Hounsell, D. eds. The Experience of Learning2Scottish Academic PressEdinburgh198216Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, J.T.E. 2000Researching Student Learning. Approaches to Studying in Campus-Based and Distance EducationOpen University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheja M. (2002). Contextualising Studies in Higher Education. First-year Experiences of Studying and Learning in Engineering. Department of Education, Stockholm University. (Doctoral diss.).Google Scholar
  36. Trigwell K., Prosser M. (in press). ‘Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory’, Educational Psychology Review 16: 409–426.Google Scholar
  37. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Waterhouse, F. 1999‘Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning’Higher Education375770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rossum, E.J., Schenk, S.M. 1984‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome’British Journal of Educational Psychology547383Google Scholar
  39. Wright, G.H. 1971Explanation and UnderstandingCornell University PressIthaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright, G.H. 1979‘Reasons, action, and experience’Kohlenberger, H. eds. Essays in Honour of Raymond KlibanshyFelix Meiner VerlagHamburg107119Google Scholar
  41. von Wright G.H. (1980). ‘Freedom and determination’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 1(31). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  42. Wistedt, I. 1994a‘Everyday common sense and school mathematics’European Journal of Psychology of Education9139147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wistedt, I. 1994b‘Reflection, communication and learning mathematics: A case study’Learning and Instruction4123138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wistedt, I. 1998‘Assessing student learning in gender inclusive tertiary mathematics and physics education’Evaluation and Program Planning21143153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME)The Centre for Cognition, Understanding and Learning, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations