Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delayed Understanding and Staying in Phase: Students’ Perceptions of their Study Situation

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Findings are presented from a study of undergraduate students’ experiences of understanding in first-year engineering. At the end of their first year of study 86 Swedish students of electrical engineering and computer science were asked to reflect in writing on their experiences of studying and learning. Fifteen of them also took part in interviews which explored in some detail their experiences of understanding in relation to perceived constraints of the teaching-learning environment. The analyses of the students’ written accounts and the interview data focused on the students’ experiences of studying and of understanding in relation to course work in engineering. The majority of the students reported problematic first-year experiences and testified to a sensation of ‘falling out of phase’ with their studies. This sensation was frequently coupled with a lag in coming to understand course material, which may be characterised in terms of delayed understanding. The notion of delayed understanding is discussed in relation to ideas about students’ perceptions of the learning environment and the impact that those perceptions might have on students’ opportunities to reflect on learning material and develop a solid understanding of course material in engineering education. In conclusion, it is suggested that the the notion of delayed understanding captures the complications of a study situation in which a perceived lack of time to reflect on learning material obstructs students’ understanding of course material in engineering, and also points up a more general aspect of learning observing that time to reflect on previous experiences is an essential component of the process of coming to understand learning material in a particular educational setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Booth I. Wistedt O. Halldén M. Martinsson F. Marton (1999) ‘Paths of learning. The joint constitution of insights’ L. Burton (Eds) Learning Mathematics – from Hierarchies to Networks Falmer Press London 62–83

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bowden F. Marton (1998) The University of Learning Kogan Page London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Case R. Gunstone (2003) ArticleTitle‘Going deeper than deep and surface approaches: A study of students’ perceptions of time’ Teaching in Higher Education 8 IssueID1 55–69 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1356251032000052320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dewey (1938) Experience and Education The Macmillan Company New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Downes (1998) Language and Society EditionNumber2 Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver (1981) ArticleTitle‘Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science’ European Journal of Science Education 3 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver J. Easley (1978) ArticleTitle‘Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students’ Studies in Science Education 5 61–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit R. (2004). Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education. Retrieved on 2 December 2004 from University of Kiel, Liebniz Institute for Science Education Website: http://.www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/.

  • R. Duit W-M. Roth M. Komorek J. Wilbers (2001) ArticleTitle‘Fostering conceptual change by analogies – between Scylla and Charybdis’ Learning and Instruction 11 283–303 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00034-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Eizenberg (1988) ‘Approaches to learning anatomy: Developing a program for pre-clinical medical students’ P. Ramsden (Eds) Improving Learning: New Perspectives Kogan Page London 178–198

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Entwistle (1995) ArticleTitle‘Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations’ Educational Psychologist 39 47–54 Occurrence Handle10.1207/s15326985ep3001_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle N. (2003). ‘University teaching-learning environments and their influences on student learning: An introduction to the ETL-project’, Paper Presented within the Symposium Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments to Improve Student Learning at the 10th EARLI-Conference, Padua 26–30 August 2003 Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html.

  • A. Entwistle N. Entwistle (1992) ArticleTitle‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’ Learning and Instruction 2 1–22 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-4752(92)90002-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Entwistle A. Entwistle (1997) ‘Revision and the experience of understanding’ F. Marton D. Hounsell N. Entwistle (Eds) The Experience of Learning EditionNumber2 Scottish Academic Press Edinburgh 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Entwistle D. Entwistle (2003) ArticleTitle‘Preparing for examinations: The interplay of memorising and understanding, and the development of knowledge objects’ Higher Education Research and Development 22 19–42 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0729436032000056562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle N., Hounsell D., Macaulay C., Situnayake G., Tait H. (1989). The Performance of Electrical Engineering Students in Scottish Higher Education. University of Edinburgh: Department of Education and TLA Centre.

  • N. Entwistle F. Marton (1994) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge objects: Understandings constituted through intensive academic study’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 64 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle N., McCune V. (in press). ‘The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories’, Educational Psychology Review 16(4), 325–345.

  • Entwistle N., Nisbet J., Bromage A. (2004). ‘Teaching-learning environments and student learning in electronic engineering’, Paper Presented at the Third Workshop of the European Network on Powerful Learning Environments, Brugge, 30 September–2 October 2004. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html.

  • A. Fransson (1977) ArticleTitle‘On qualitative differences in learning IV. Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome’. British Journal of Educational Psychology 47 244–257

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Halldén (1999) ‘Conceptual change and contextualisation’ W. Schnotz S. Vosniadou M. Carretero (Eds) New Perspectives on Conceptual Change Hillsdale Erlbaum NJ 53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Halldén G. Petersson M. Scheja K. Ehrlén L. Haglund K. Österlind A. Stenlund (2002) ‘Situating the question of conceptual change’ M. Limon L. Mason (Eds) Reconsidering Conceptual change – issues in Theory and Practice Kluwer Dordrecht 137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstad G. (1999). Understandings of Understanding. An Inquiry Concerning Experiential Conditions for Developmental Learning. Goteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Department of Education, Gothenburgh University. (Doctoral diss.).

  • S. Kvale (1989) ‘To validate is to question’ S. Kvale (Eds) Issues of Validity in Qualitative Research Studentlitteratur Lund 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie D.R. (1997). ‘Using a modified concept mapping strategy to identify students’ alternative scientific understandings of biology’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Chicago, Illinois, 21–24 March, 1997.

  • F. Marton R. Säljö (1976a) ArticleTitle‘On qualitative differences in learning I. Outcome and process’. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Marton R. Säljö (1976b) ArticleTitle‘On qualitative differences II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Marton R. Säljö (1997) ‘Approaches to learning’ F. Marton D. Hounsell N. Entwistle (Eds) The Experience of Learning EditionNumber2 Scottish Academic Press Edinburgh 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune V. (2003). ‘Promoting high-quality learning: perspectives from the ETL project’, Paper Presented at the Norwegian Network in Higher Education 14th Conference on University and College Pedagogy, Fredrikstad, 22–23 October 2003. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html.

  • Nisbet J., Entwistle N., McQuillion B., Robinson I. (2004). ‘Staff and student perceptions of the teaching-learning environment: A case study’, Paper Presented at the University of Wolverhampton/LTSN/BEES International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education, Wolverhampton, 7–9 June 2004. Retrieved on 30 November 2004 from University of Edinburgh ETL Project Website: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html.

  • G.J. Posner K.A. Strike P.W. Hewson W.A. Gertzog (1982) ArticleTitle‘Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change’ Science Education 66 IssueID2 211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ramsden (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ramsden (1997) ‘The context of learning in academic departments’ F. Marton N. Entwistle D. Hounsell (Eds) The Experience of Learning EditionNumber2 Scottish Academic Press Edinburgh 198–216

    Google Scholar 

  • J.T.E. Richardson (2000) Researching Student Learning. Approaches to Studying in Campus-Based and Distance Education Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheja M. (2002). Contextualising Studies in Higher Education. First-year Experiences of Studying and Learning in Engineering. Department of Education, Stockholm University. (Doctoral diss.).

  • Trigwell K., Prosser M. (in press). ‘Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory’, Educational Psychology Review 16: 409–426.

  • K. Trigwell M. Prosser F. Waterhouse (1999) ArticleTitle‘Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning’ Higher Education 37 57–70 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003548313194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Rossum Particlevan S.M. Schenk (1984) ArticleTitle‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 54 73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • G.H. Wright Particlevon (1971) Explanation and Understanding Cornell University Press Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G.H. Wright Particlevon (1979) ‘Reasons, action, and experience’ H. Kohlenberger (Eds) Essays in Honour of Raymond Klibanshy Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg 107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright G.H. (1980). ‘Freedom and determination’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 1(31). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

  • I. Wistedt (1994a) ArticleTitle‘Everyday common sense and school mathematics’ European Journal of Psychology of Education 9 139–147 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF03173549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Wistedt (1994b) ArticleTitle‘Reflection, communication and learning mathematics: A case study’ Learning and Instruction 4 123–138 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-4752(94)90007-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Wistedt (1998) ArticleTitle‘Assessing student learning in gender inclusive tertiary mathematics and physics education’ Evaluation and Program Planning 21 143–153 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Scheja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheja, M. Delayed Understanding and Staying in Phase: Students’ Perceptions of their Study Situation. High Educ 52, 421–445 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7765-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7765-7

Keywords

Navigation