Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 645–664 | Cite as

Evaluating Web-supported Learning Versus Lecture-based Teaching: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives

  • Norah Frederickson
  • Phil Reed
  • Viv Clifford
Article

Abstract

A graduate level research methods and statistics course offered on the World-Wide Web was evaluated relative to the traditional lWith their consent, course members were randomly assigned to the two versions of the course for the first block of sessions. For the second block of sessions the groups crossed over to access the alternative version of the course. Quantitative and qualitative outcome data were collected to sample cognitive and affective domains. Improvements in knowledge and reductions in anxiety were apparent following both versions, with no significant differences between versions being detected. Analysis of course member comments indicated less satisfaction with the teaching input on the web-based version but more satisfaction with the peer collaboration that was stimulated. An activity theory framework is applied in conceptualising the findings and generating recommendations for further course development and evaluation.

Key words

activity theory evaluation learning outcomes statistics course student satisfaction web-based. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashcraft, M.H., Kirk, E.P., Hopko, D. 1998‘On the cognitive consequences of mathematics anxiety’Donlan, C. eds. The Development of Mathematical Skills.Psychology PressHove175196Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C., Rada, R. 1996‘Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies’Human–Computer Interaction11125156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel, J.S. 1998Mega Universities and the Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher EducationKogan PageLondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillon, A., Gabbard, R. 1998‘Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learning comprehension, control and style’Review of Educational Research68322349Google Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. 1987Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental ResearchOrienta-KonsultitHelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  6. Engeström Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work. Towards an Activity-Theoretical Reconceptualisation. Lifelong Learning Group, Occasional Paper No. 1. Institute of Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedrich K.R., Armer L. (1999). ‘The instructional and technological challenges of a web based course in educational statistics and measurement’. Presented at the Society for Educational Technology and Teacher Education 10th International Conference, San Antonio, TX, February 28–March 4 1999Google Scholar
  8. Harding, R.D., Lay, S.W., Moule, H., Quinney, D.A. 1995‘A mathematical tool-kit for interactive hypertext courseware: Part of the mathematics experience within the Renaissance project’Computers Education24127135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hewson, L., Hughes, C. 2001‘Generic structures for on-line teaching and learning’Lockwood, F.Gooley, A. eds. Innovation in Open and Distance Learning.Kogan PageLondon7687Google Scholar
  10. Huang, H-M. 2002‘Towards constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments’, British Journal of Educational Technology332737Google Scholar
  11. Issroff, K., Scanlon, E. 2002‘Using technology in higher education: An activity theory perspective’Journal of Computer Assisted Learning187783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobson, M.J. and Spiro, R.J. (1993). Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer of Complex Knowledge: An Empirical Investigation. Tech Report, Champagne IL, Centre for the Study of Reading University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, Y.J. 2002‘Attitudes affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning’Journal of Computer Assisted Learning1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kemmis, S. 1993‘Action research’Hammersley, M. eds. Educational Research: Current Issues.ChapmanLondonGoogle Scholar
  15. King, B. 2001‘Making a virtue of necessity – a low-cost, comprehensive online teaching and learning environment’Lockwood, F.Gooley, A. eds. Innovation in Open and Distance Learning.Kogan PageLondon5162Google Scholar
  16. Knowles, M. 1990The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species4Gulf PublishingHoustonGoogle Scholar
  17. KuuttiK.,  1996‘Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research’Nardi, B. eds. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction.MIT PressMass1744Google Scholar
  18. LandauerR.,  1995The Trouble with ComputersMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurillard, D. 2002Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective use of Educational Technology2RoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Leont’ev, A.N. 1981Problems of Development of the MindProgressMoscowGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockwood, F. 2001‘Innovation in distributed learning: Creating the environment’Lockwood, F.Gooley, A. eds. Innovation in Open and Distance Learning.Kogan PageLondon114Google Scholar
  22. Lockyer, L., Patterson, J., Harper, B. 1999‘Measuring effectiveness of health education in a web-based learning environment: A preliminary report’Higher Education Research and Development18233246Google Scholar
  23. Maki, R.H., Maki, W.S., Patterson, M., Whittaker, P.D. 2000‘Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction on-line versus lecturer courses’Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers32230239Google Scholar
  24. Monsen, J., Graham, B., Frederickson, N., Cameron, R.J 1998‘Problem analysis and professional training in educational psychology: An accountable model of practice’Educational Psychology in Practice13234249Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, R., McLoughlin, C. 2001‘Using networking tools to support online learning’Lockwood, F.Gooley, A. eds. Innovation in Open and Distance Learning.Kogan PageLondon148159Google Scholar
  26. Plake, B.S., Parker, C.S. 1982‘The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety rating Scale’Educational and Psychological Measurement42551557Google Scholar
  27. Recker, M., Pirolli, P. 1995‘Modelling individual differences in students’ learning strategies’Journal of the Learning Sciences4138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, F.C., Suinn, R.M. 1972‘The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data’Journal of Counselling Psychology19551554Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, G. 2003‘Teaching using the Web: Conceptions and approaches from a phenomenographic perspective’Instructional Science31127150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salmon, G. 2000E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning OnlineKogan PageLondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Schön, D.A. 1987Education the Reflective PractitionerJossey-BassSan Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Sinagub, J. 1996Focus Group Interviews in Education and PsychologySageThousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L. 1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological ProcessesCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Whalley, P. 1993‘An alternative rhetoric for hypertext’McKnight, C.Dillon, A.Richardson, J. eds. Hypertext: A Psychological Perspective.Ellis HorwoodLondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, W.M., Ceci, S.J. 1997“How’m I doing?’ Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses’Change291323Google Scholar
  36. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., Ross, G. 1976‘The role of tutoring in problem-solving’Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry17149161Google Scholar
  37. Zimitat, C. 2001‘Designating effective in-line continuing medical education’Medical Teacher23117122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations