Does Moral Case Deliberation Help Professionals in Care for the Homeless in Dealing with Their Dilemmas? A Mixed-Methods Responsive Study
- 536 Downloads
Health care professionals often face moral dilemmas. Not dealing constructively with moral dilemmas can cause moral distress and can negatively affect the quality of care. Little research has been documented with methodologies meant to support professionals in care for the homeless in dealing with their dilemmas. Moral case deliberation (MCD) is a method for systematic reflection on moral dilemmas and is increasingly being used as ethics support for professionals in various health-care domains. This study deals with the question: What is the contribution of MCD in helping professionals in an institution for care for the homeless to deal with their moral dilemmas? A mixed-methods responsive evaluation design was used to answer the research question. Five teams of professionals from a Dutch care institution for the homeless participated in MCD three times. Professionals in care for the homeless value MCD positively. They report that MCD helped them to identify the moral dilemma/question, and that they learned from other people’s perspectives while reflecting and deliberating on the values at stake in the dilemma or moral question. They became aware of the moral dimension of moral dilemmas, of related norms and values, of other perspectives, and learned to formulate a moral standpoint. Some experienced the influence of MCD in the way they dealt with moral dilemmas in daily practice. Half of the professionals expect MCD will influence the way they deal with moral dilemmas in the future. Most of them were in favour of further implementation of MCD in their organization.
KeywordsMoral dilemmas Dealing with dilemmas Care for the homeless Moral case deliberation Evaluation Mixed-methods research
We thank Guus Bakker and Tisra van Exel for their contribution as student researchers to this research.
- Aristotle. (2008). Ethica Nicomachea. Translated by Hupperts, C. and Poortman, B. Budel: Uitgeverij Damon.Google Scholar
- Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving new public management. Journal of Social Intervention, 20(2), 5–23.Google Scholar
- Gadamer, H.-G. (2010). Wahrheit und Methode (7. Aufl.) [Truth and Method] (7th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
- Greene, J. C., & Abma T. A. (Eds.). (2001). Responsive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 92, 1–105.Google Scholar
- Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Kessels, J., Boers, E., & Mostert, P. (2013). Free space: Field guide. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
- Mertens, D. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Los Angeles: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Dartel, H. van, & Molewijk, B. (2014). In gesprek blijven over goede zorg. Overlegmethoden voor ethiek in de praktijk [Keep on deliberating on good care. Conversation methods for ethics in practice]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
- Molewijk, B., Zadelhoff, E., Lendemeijer, B., & Widdershoven, G. (2008c). Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: Improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Bioethica Forum, 1(1), 57–65.Google Scholar
- Nelson, L. (1994). De socratische methode [The Socratic method]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Silén, M. (2012). Encountering ethical problems and moral distress as a nurse. Experiences, contributing factors and handling. 2012. http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:450421/FULLTEXT02.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2016.
- Timms, P., & Borrell, T. (2001). Doing the right thing—ethical and practical dilemmas in working with homeless mentally ill people. Journal of mental health, 10(4), 419–426.Google Scholar
- van der Dam, S., Schols, J. M.G.A., Kardol, T. J.M.; Molewijk, B. C., Widdershoven, G. A.M. & Abma, T. A. (2013). The discovery of deliberation. From ambiguity to appreciation through the learning process of doing Moral Case Deliberation in Dutch elderly care. 2013; In Dam, van der S. Ethics support in elderly care. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht. pp 95–113.Google Scholar
- Walker, U. (2003). Moral contexts. Maryland: Rowland & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Spijkerboer, R. P., Widdershoven, G. A. M., Stel, J. C. van der, & Molewijk, A. M. Moral dilemmas in care for the homeless: What issues do professionals face, how do they deal with them and do they need ethics support? Accepted for publication.Google Scholar