HEC Forum

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 203–217 | Cite as

The Benefits of Practice Standards and Other Practice-Defining Texts: And Why Healthcare Ethicists Ought to Explore Them



This article outlines one element of the work carried out by a group of Canadian ethicists [Practicing Healthcare Ethicists Exploring Professionalization (PHEEP)]—to begin the deliberative development of a set of practice standards for the Canadian context. To provide a backdrop, this article considers the nature and purpose of practice standards as they are used by regulated professions and how they relate to other practice-defining texts such as competencies, codes of ethics and statements of scope of practice. A comparative review of current practice-defining documents developed within the field of healthcare ethics practice suggests that practice standards are not yet among them. A review of the practice standards and related texts articulated by various other professions, both regulated and not yet regulated, indicates that while these groups of documents serve to define and clarify various dimensions of practice in individual disciplines, there is no clear standardized approach to the terminology, structure and content across these documents. It is suggested that this variability presents a degree of flexibility that ought to allay many of the anxieties that have been expressed about practice standards in healthcare ethics: practitioners, PHEs, are at liberty to define their practice as they see fit, albeit within reasonable parameters if regulation is sought. A proposal for a draft structure and potential content for Canadian healthcare ethics practice standards is offered.


Clinical ethics Consultation Ethics Practice Professionalization Standards 


  1. American Nurses Association. (2004). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Springs, MD: American Nurses Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2009). Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.Google Scholar
  3. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). Core competencies for health care ethics consultation (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, R. (2007). A history of codes of ethics for bioethicists. In L. A. Eckenwiler & F. G. Cohn (Eds.), The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape (pp. 24–42). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, R. (2009). In defense of bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, J. P., Fanning, J. B., & Bliton, M. J. (2010). Echo Calling Narcissus: What Exceeds the Gaze of Clinical Ethics Consultation? HEC Forum, 22(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
  7. Bullock, A. & Trombley, S. (1999). The new Fontana dictionary of modern thought. London: Harper-Collins. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profession#cite_note-8#cite_note-8. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  8. Canadian Association for Spiritual Care (2004). CASC Policy and Procedure Manual. Oakville, ON: Canadian Association for Spiritual Care. http://www.cappe.org/Manual/index.html#CH3Prac. Accessed 1 August 2012.
  9. Canadian Association for Spiritual Care (2011). Competencies for Spiritual Care and Counselling Specialist. Oakville, ON: Canadian Association for Spiritual Care. http://www.cappe.org/ed_mod/index.html. Accessed 1 August 2012.
  10. Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs (CECA) Committee of the American society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2010). CECA Report to the Board of Directors, American Society for Bioethics and HumanitiesCertification, Accreditation, and Credentialing (C/A/C) of Clinical Ethics Consultants. http://www.asbh.org/uploads/files/ceca%20c-a%20report%20101210.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  11. Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs (CECA) Committee of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). CECA Committee meeting minutes October 13, 2011. http://www.asbh.org/uploads/files/membership/pdfs/111013%20ceca%20mtg%20minutes.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  12. Cockburn, L. (2001a). The professional era. CAOT in the 50’s and 60’s. OT Now. May/June. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists: Ottawa. http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/CAOT1950_60s.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  13. Cockburn, L. (2001b). Change, expansion and reorganization. CAOT in the 70’s. OT Now. July/August. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists: Ottawa. Available from: http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/CAOT1970s.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  14. Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation. (2010). Glossary of general terminology used in professional and occupational regulation. Available from http://clearhq.org/resources/Glossary_General.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  15. Dubler, N. N., Webber, M. P., Swiderski, D. M., & Faculty and National Working Group for the Clinical Ethics Credentialing Project. (2009). Charting the future: Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engelhardt, H. T. (1977). Defining occupational therapy: The meaning of therapy and the virtues of occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 666–672.Google Scholar
  17. Engelhardt, H. T. (1983). Occupational therapists as technologists and custodians of meaning. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Health through occupation (pp. 139–144). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  18. Engelhardt, H. T. (2009). Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogeneous social skills: The emperor without clothes. HEC Forum, 21(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, J. H. (2012). The history and future of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frolic, A. (2012). Grassroots origins, National engagement: Exploring the professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists in Canada. HEC Forum, 24(3). doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9192-y.
  21. Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council (2006). Regulation of Health Professions in Ontario: New Directions. Toronto, ON: Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council. http://www.hprac.org/en/reports/resources/PsychENG_ReportFINAL.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2012.
  22. Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council. (2011). Regulation of a New Health Profession under the Regulated Health Professions Act (RHPA), 1991. Criteria and process. http://www.hprac.org/en/projects/resources/RegulatingaNewProfession_CriteriaProcess_Nov2011.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2012.
  23. Jongbloed, L. (1984). Substitutability of work and the professionalization of occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapists, 51(3), 131–133.Google Scholar
  24. King, M. P. (2007). The glass house: Assessing bioethics. In L. A. Eckenwiler & F. G. Cohn (Eds.), The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape (pp. 296–309). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kirby, J. & Simpson, C. (2012). Deliberative engagement: An inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization. HEC Forum, 24(3). doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9189-6.
  26. Larcher, V., Watson, A., & Slowther, A. (2007). Core competencies for Clinical Ethics Committees: A consensus statement from the UK Clinical Ethics Network. UK Clinical Ethics Network. http://www.ukcen.net/uploads/docs/education_resources/core_competencies1.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  27. MacDonald, C. (undated). Draft: Model Code of Ethics for Bioethics. http://www.bioethics.ca/resources/PDF%20documents/draftcode.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  28. O’Flaherty, M., & Ulrich, G. (2010). The professional identity of the human rights field officer. Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Reel, K., & Feaver, S. (2006). Models—terminology and usefulness. In S. Davis (Ed.), Rehabilitation—the use of theories and models in practice (pp. 49–62). Edinburgh: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Reel, K., & Hutching, S. (2007). Being part of a team: Interprofessional care. In G. Hawley (Ed.), Ethics in clinical practice—An interprofessional approach (pp. 137–153). Harlow, England: Pearson.Google Scholar
  31. Registered Nurses Act, c. 21. (2006). Statutes of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Government of Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
  32. Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_91r18_e.htm. Accessed 16 April 2012.
  33. Scofield, G. (2008).What is medical ethics consultation? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Spring, 36, 95–118.Google Scholar
  34. Simpson, C. (2012a). Getting engaged: Exploring professionalization in Canada: Introduction to this Issue. HEC Forum, 24(3). doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9191-z.
  35. Simpson, C. (2012b). Mapping our practice? Some conceptual “bumps” for us to consider. HEC Forum, 24(3). doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9188-7.
  36. Spike, J. P. (2009). Resolving the vexing question of credentialing: Finding the Aristotelian mean. HEC Forum, 21(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinkamp, N. L., Gordijn, B., & ten Have, H. A. J. M. (2008). Ethical expertise revisited: Reply to Giles Scofield. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18(4), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Task Force on Working Conditions for Bioethicists. (2008). Model Job/Role Description. http://www.bioethics.ca/publications-ang.html. Accessed 16 April 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, and Southlake Regional Health CentreNewmarketCanada
  2. 2.Joint Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations