HEC Forum

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 313–326 | Cite as

The Duty to Warn and Clinical Ethics: Legal and Ethical Aspects of Confidentiality and HIV/AIDS



Sexual Intercourse Moral Duty Civil Commitment Federal Supreme Clinical Ethic Committee 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. (2006-2007). Code of medical ethics. Current opinions with annotations. Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bennet R., Draper H., Frith L. (2000). Ignorance is bliss? HIV and moral duties and legal duties to forewarn. Journal of Medical Ethics 26:9-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, T., Bradley, H., & Boyle, B. (2002). Legal issues associated with disclosure of patient’s HIV+ status to third parties. The Nexus, Summer, 4-5.Google Scholar
  4. Bruckner F. Firestone M. (2000). Where the public peril begins: 25 years after TARASOFF. Journal of Legal Medicine 21:187-222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesärztekammer (German Medical Association): (Muster-) Berufsordnung für die deutschen Ärztinnen und Ärzte (Professional Code for the German Physicians). (2004). [On-line] Available: www.bundesaerztekammer.de/ 30 /Berufsordnung/10Mbo/.
  6. Carney B.M. (2001). Breaches of confidentiality and the electronic community health record: challenges for healthcare organizations and the community. HEC Forum 13(2):138-147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalmers J. (2002). The criminalization of HIV transmission. Sexually Transmitted Infections 78:448-451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmers J. (2004). Criminalization of HIV transmission: can doctors be liable for the onward transmission of HIV?. International Journal of STD &AIDS 15:782-787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chenneville T. (2000). HIV, confidentiality, and duty to protect: a decisionmaking model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 31(6):661-670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felthous A.R. (2006). Warning a potential victim of a person’s dangerousness: clinician’s duty or victim’s right?. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 34:338-348Google Scholar
  11. Frewer A., Säfken C. (2003). Ärztliche Schweigepflicht und die Gefährdung Dritter. Medizinethische und juristische Probleme der neueren Rechtsprechung. Ethik in der Medizin 1:15-24Google Scholar
  12. Herbert P.B., Young K.A. (2002). Tarasoff at twenty-five. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 30:275-281Google Scholar
  13. Kaldjian L.C. (2003). HIV Testing and partner notification: physicians′; ethical responsibilities in a persistent epidemic. Advanced Studies in Medicine 7:413-414Google Scholar
  14. Muhammad A. (2006). Mandatory HIV notification: bioethical concerns vs. public health concerns, health and medical dilemmas. Journal of American Science 2(1):42-45Google Scholar
  15. Neitzke, G. & Frewer, A. (2005). Beratung in Krisensituationen und Klinische Ethik-Komitees. Zum Umgang mit moralischen Problemen in der Patientenversorgung. In: Andreas Frewer/Rolf Winau (ed.). Ethische Probleme in Lebenskrisen. Grundkurs Ethik in der Medizin Band 3 Erlangen and Jena: Verlag, 167-176.Google Scholar
  16. Rogers W.A., Draper H. (2003). Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 29:220-224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weait M. (2005). Criminal law and the sexual transmission of HIV: R v Dica. The Modern Law Review Limited 68(1):121-134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zentrale Ethikkommission (Central Ethics Committee). (2006). Ethikberatung in der klinischen Medizin: Stellungnahme der Zentralen Kommission zur Wahrung ethischer Grundsätze in der Medizin und ihren Grenzgebieten. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 103 (24), A1703-A1707.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TostedtGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der MedizinFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations