Advertisement

Health Care Management Science

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 303–317 | Cite as

Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design

  • Soheil Davari
  • Kemal Kilic
  • Gurdal Ertek
Article

Abstract

Preventive health care is unlike health care for acute ailments, as people are less alert to their unknown medical problems. In order to motivate public and to attain desired participation levels for preventive programs, the attractiveness of the health care facility is a major concern. Health economics literature indicates that attractiveness of a facility is significantly influenced by proximity of the clients to it. Hence attractiveness is generally modelled as a function of distance. However, abundant empirical evidence suggests that other qualitative factors such as perceived quality, attractions nearby, amenities, etc. also influence attractiveness. Therefore, a realistic measure should incorporate the vagueness in the concept of attractiveness to the model. The public policy makers should also maintain the equity among various neighborhoods, which should be considered as a second objective. Finally, even though the general tendency in the literature is to focus on health benefits, the cost effectiveness is still a factor that should be considered. In this paper, a fuzzy bi-objective model with budget constraints is developed. Later, by modelling the attractiveness by means of fuzzy triangular numbers and treating the budget constraint as a soft constraint, a modified (and more realistic) version of the model is introduced. Two solution methodologies, namely fuzzy goal programming and fuzzy chance constrained optimization are proposed as solutions. Both the original and the modified models are solved within the framework of a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. In the case study, the Microsoft Bing Map is utilized in order to determine more accurate distance measures among the nodes.

Keywords

Preventive health care Multi-objective optimization Fuzzy goal programming Facility location 

References

  1. 1.
    Alumur S, Kara BY (2007) A new model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1406–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batta R, Lejeune M, Prasad S (2014) Public facility location using dispersion, population, and equity criteria. Eur J Oper Res 234(3):819–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beliën J, Boeck LD, Colpaert J, Devesse S, den Bossche FV (2013) Optimizing the facility location design of organ transplant centers. Decis Support Syst 54(4):1568–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biørn E, Godager G (2010) Does quality influence choice of general practitioner? an analysis of matched doctor-patient panel data. Econ Model 27(4):842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Capps CS, Schut FT (2008) Defining hospital markets for antitrust enforcement: new approaches and their applicability to the netherlands. Health Econ Policy Law 3:7–29Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charnes A, Clower R, Kortanek K (1967) Effective control through coherent decentralization with preemptive goals. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 35(2):294–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO (1955) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charnes A, Cooper WW, Niehaus R (1967) A goal programming model for manpower planning. Tech. rep., DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cocking C, Flessa S, Reinelt G (2012) Improving access to health facilities in nouna district, burkina faso. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 46(2):164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC (2008) Does preventive care save money? health economics and the presidential candidates. New England J Med 358(7):661–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turkey life science and healthcare report. http://www.yased.org.tr (2012). Online accessed 27 May 2014. Deloitte
  12. 12.
    Feng T, Timmermans HJ (2014) Trade-offs between mobility and equity maximization under environmental capacity constraints: A case study of an integrated multi-objective model. In: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galvao RD, Espejo LGA, Boffey B (2002) A hierarchical model for the location of perinatal facilities in the municipality of rio de janeiro. Eur J Oper Res 138(3):495–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldman D, Romley JA (2008) Hospitals as hotels: the role of patient amenities in hospital demand. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gravelle HS, Propper C, Santos R (2013) Does quality affect patients? choice of doctor? evidence from the uk. Tech. rep., C.E.P.R. Discussion PapersGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gu W, Wang X, McGregor SE (2010) Optimization of preventive health care facility locations. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunes ED, Yaman H, Cekyay B, Verter V (2014) Matching patient and physician preferences. J Oper Res Soc 65(4):483–496Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haimes YY, Lasdon LS, Wismer DA (1971) On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1(3):296–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hakimi SL (1964) Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper Res 12(3):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haynes R, Lovett A, Sunnenberg G (2003) Potential accessibility, travel time, and consumer choice: geographical variations in general medical practice registrations in eastern england. Environ Plan A 35(10):1733–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holland WW (2005) Screening in disease prevention: what works? Radcliffe PublishingGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hwang CL, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 164. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundations, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 154. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu B (2009) Theory and practice of uncertain programming, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 239. Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI (2010) Greater use of preventive services in us health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff 29(9):1656–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Byers AH (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Tech. rep. McKinsey Global InstituteGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Masud AS, Hwang CL (1981) Interactive sequential goal programming. J Oper Res Soc 32(5):391–400Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mavrotas G (2009) Effective implementation of the epsillon-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput 213(2):455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller I, Smith T, Mellor S, Rare L, Genton B (1998) The effect of distance from home on attendance at a small rural health centre in papua new guinea. Int J Epidemiol 27(5):878–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ndiaye M, Alfares H (2008) Modeling health care facility location for moving population groups. Comput Oper Res 35(7):2154–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ozkok BA, Tiryaki F (2011) A compensatory fuzzy approach to multi-objective linear supplier selection problem with multiple-item. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):11,363–11,368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parker BR, Srinivasan V (1976) A consumer preference approach to the planning of rural primary health-care facilities. Oper Res 24(5):991–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Savas BS, Karahan O, Saka RO Health care systems in transition. http://www.euro.who.int (2002). Online accessed 27 May 2014
  34. 34.
    Schwartz M (2012) Health care quality, access, cost, workforce, and surgical education: the ultimate perfect storm. J Pediatr Surg 47(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shariat-Mohayman A, Babaei M, Moadi S, Amiripour SM (2012) Linear upper-bound unavailability set covering models for locating ambulances: application to tehran rural roads. Eur J Oper Res 221(1):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shariff SS, Moin NH, Omar M (2012) Location allocation modeling for healthcare facility planning in malaysia. Comput Ind Eng 62(4):1000–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsou KW, Hung YT, Chang YL (2005) An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 22(6):424–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    TUIK Number of beds in public and private in-patient institutions. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr (2012). Online accessed 27 May 2014
  39. 39.
    TurkishMinistryofHealth Activity report 2013. http://www.sgb.saglik.gov.tr (2013). Online accessed 27 May 2014
  40. 40.
    Varkevisser M, van der Geest SA, Schut FT (2012) Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the netherlands. J Health Econ 31(2):371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Verter V, Lapierre SD (2002) Location of preventive health care facilities. Ann Oper Res 110(1–4):123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Werners BM (1988) Aggregation models in mathematical programming. Math Models Decis Support 48:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    WHO five years of progress in global tobacco control. http://www.who.int (2013). Online accessed 27 May 2014
  44. 44.
    Woolf SH, Husten CG, Lewin LS, Marks J, Fielding J, Sanchez E (2009) The economic argument for disease prevention: distinguishing between value and savings. Partnership for preventionGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zadeh L (1999) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100 Supplement 1:9–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8 (3):338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhang Y, Berman O, Marcotte P, Verter V (2010) A bilevel model for preventive healthcare facility network design with congestion. IIE Trans 42(12):865–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V. (2009) Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design. Eur J Oper Res 198(3):922–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V (2012) The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectrum 34(2):349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zimmermann H. (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesSabanci UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations