A Bayesian approach to assess heart disease mortality among persons with diabetes in the presence of missing data
Some states’ death certificate form includes a diabetes yes/no check box that enables policy makers to investigate the change in heart disease mortality rates by diabetes status. Because the check boxes are sometimes unmarked, a method accounting for missing data is needed when estimating heart disease mortality rates by diabetes status. Using North Dakota’s data (1992–2003), we generate the posterior distribution of diabetes status to estimate diabetes status among those with heart disease and an unmarked check box using Monte Carlo methods. Combining this estimate with the number of death certificates with known diabetes status provides a numerator for heart disease mortality rates. Denominators for rates were estimated from the North Dakota Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Accounting for missing data, age-adjusted heart disease mortality rates (per 1,000) among women with diabetes were 8.6 during 1992–1998 and 6.7 during 1999–2003. Among men with diabetes, rates were 13.0 during 1992–1998 and 10.0 during 1999–2003. The Bayesian approach accounted for the uncertainty due to missing diabetes status as well as the uncertainty in estimating the populations with diabetes.
KeywordsMissing data Bayesian methods Random walk Metropolis-Hastings Diabetes mortality Death certificate data Diabetes check box
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anderson RN, Smith BL (2005) Deaths: Leading causes for 2002. National Vital Statistics Report 53 (17) 1–89. (Available at http://www/cdc/gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr53/nvsr53_17.pdf, accessed 9 June 2006.)
- 3.Geiss LS, Herman WH, Smith PJ (1995) Mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. In: Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, Boyko EJ, Reiber GE, Bennet PH (eds) Diabetes in America, 2nd ed. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, Boyle JP, Benjamin SM, Gregg EW, Tierney EF, Rios-Burrows N, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Imperatore G, Narayan KM (2004) The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 140:945–950Google Scholar
- 6.Tierney EF, Geiss LS, Engelgau MM, Thompson TJ, Schauber D, Shireley LA, Bukelic PJ, McDonough SL (2001) Population-based estimates of mortality associated with diabetes: use of a death certificate check box in North Dakota. Am J Public Health 91:84–92Google Scholar
- 13.Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian data analysis, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measure of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B44:377–387Google Scholar
- 15.SUDAAN (2004) Language Manual. Release 9.0 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Anderson RN, Rosenberg HM (1998) Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard. National Center for Health Statistic, National Vital Statistics Reports 47(3)Google Scholar
- 17.Schafer JL (1997) Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 18.Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2003) WinBUGS user manual version 1.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, CambridgeGoogle Scholar