Abstract
A moral right to health or health care is a special instance of a right to fair equality of opportunity. Nation-states generally have the capabilities to specify the entitlements of such a right and to raise the resources needed to satisfy those entitlements. Can these functions be replicated globally, as a global right to health or health care requires? The suggestion that “better global governance” is needed if such a global right is to be claimed requires that these two central capabilities be present. It is unlikely that nation-states would concede these two functions to a form of global governance, for doing so would seriously compromise the authority that is generally included in sovereignty. This claim is a specification of what is often recognized as the “sovereignty problem.” The argument of this paper is not an “impossibility” claim, but a best guess about whether the necessary conditions for better global governance that supports a global right to health or health care can be achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). (2011). Emergency and transitional shelter provision flawed, new evaluation shows. http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/relief-and-reconstruction-watch/emergency-and-transitional-shelter-provision-flawed-new-evaluation-shows
Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). (2012). Evolution of donor response to Haití earthquake shows “building back better” nothing but a slogan. http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/relief-and-reconstruction-watch/evaluation-of-donor-response-to-haiti-earthquake-shows-building-back-better-nothing-but-a-slogan
Corte Constitucional de Columbia. Sentencia T-760 del 2008. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2008/t-760-08.html
Daniels, N. (1985). Just health care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. (1986). Why saying no to patients in the united states is so hard: Cost containment, justice, and provider autonomy. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1381–1383.
Daniels, N. (1987). The ideal advocate and limited resources. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 8(1), 69–80.
Daniels, N. (2008). Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N., Kennedy, B., & Kawachi, I. (1999). Why justice is good for our health: The social determinants of health inequalities. Daedalus, 128(4), 215–251.
Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. E. (1997). Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, 303–350.
Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. E. (2002). Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources?. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fried, C. (1978). Right and wrong. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Fuchs N. (2011) Who shall live? Health, economics, and social choice (2nd expanded ed.). Hackensack: World Scientific Publishing.
Gettleman, J. (2014). Ebola rages, poor planning thwarts efforts. New York Times, December 6.
Gewirth, A. (1996). Community of rights. Chicago: U Chicago Press. But see Holmes, S. & Sunstein, C. (1999). The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Gostin, L. (2014). Global health law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gruskin, S., & Daniels, N. (2008). Justice and human rights: Priority setting and fair deliberative process. American Journal of Public Health, 98(9), 1573–1577.
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Oxford: Blackwell.
Osborne, M., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J., Kelly, E. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the Covenant), 11 August 2000, E/C.12/2000/4. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d0.html
UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 993, p. 3. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.html. Accessed September 11, 2014.
WHO (2005), International Health Regulations (2005), Second Edition 2008. http://www.who.int/ihr/publications/9789241596664/en/
Yamin, A., & Gloppen, S. (Eds.). (2011). Litigating health rights: Can courts bring more justice to health?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yamin, A., & Norheim, O. (2014). Taking equality seriously: Applying human rights frameworks to priority setting in health. Human Rights Quarterly, 36, 296–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniels, N. A Progressively Realizable Right to Health and Global Governance. Health Care Anal 23, 330–340 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0298-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0298-7