Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 107–121 | Cite as

Conceptions of Well-Being in Psychology and Exercise Psychology Research: A Philosophical Critique

  • Andrew Bloodworth
  • Mike McNamee
Original Article

Abstract

The potential of physical activity to improve our health has been the subject of extensive research [38]. The relationship between physical activity and well-being has prompted substantial interest from exercise psychologists in particular [3], and it seems, is generating increasing interest outside the academic community in healthcare policy and practice inter alia through GP referrals for exercise. Researchers in the field have benefited from a rich tradition within psychology that investigates subjective well-being and its antecedents [7]. We argue that the exercise and health psychology research suffers from this intellectual ancestry specifically in the form of two significant conceptual limitations. First, short-term pleasure and enjoyment which are associated with exercise induced well-being may mask activities that are doing us no good or even harm us [18]. Second, focusing on pleasure entails unacceptable methodological reductionism which undermines the validity of such research by excluding other ways in which our well-being may be enhanced in non-hedonistic terms.

Keywords

Physical activity Philosophy Subjective well-being 

References

  1. 1.
    Arneson, R. J. (1999). Human flourishing versus desire satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16(1), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biddle, S. J. H. (2000). Emotion, mood and physical activity. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), Physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 63–87). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biddle, S. J. H., Fox, K. R., & Boutcher, S. H. (Eds.). (2000) Physical activity and psychological well-being. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diener, E. (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faulkner, G, & Biddle, S. (2004). Exercise and depression: Considering variability and contextuality. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 3–18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finnis, J. (1983). Fundamentals of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, K. R. (2000). The effects of exercise on self-perceptions and self-esteem. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), Physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 88–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hochstetler, D. R. (2003). Process and the sport experience. Quest, 55, 231–243.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahenman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kupperman, J. J. (2003). Comfort, hedonic treadmills, and public policy. Public Affairs Quarterly, 17(1), 17–28.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehmann, M., Foster, C., & Keul, J. (1993). Overtraining in endurance athletes: A brief review. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 25, 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loumidis, K., & Wells, A. (2001). Exercising for the wrong reasons: Relationships among eating disorder beliefs, dysfunctional exercise beliefs and coping. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAuley, E., Blissmer, B., Marquez, D. X., Jerome, G. J., Kramer, A. F., & Katula, J. (2000). Social relations, physical activity and well-being in older adults. Preventive Medicine, 31, 608–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNamee, M. J. (1994). Valuing leisure practices: Towards a theoretical framework. Leisure Studies, 13, 288–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meehan, H. (2004). The overtraining syndrome: a multicontextual assessment. The Sport Psychologist, 18, 154–171.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mutrie, N. (2000). The relationship between physical activity and clinically defined depression. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 46–62). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schnohr, P., Kristensen, T. S., Prescott, E., & Scharling, H. (2005). Stress and life dissatisfaction are inversely associated with jogging and other types of physical activity in leisure time – The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 15(2), 107–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seedhouse, D. (2001). Health: The foundations for achievement. 2nd Edn. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sen, A. (1985). Rights and capabilities. In T. Honderich (Ed.), Morality and objectivity (pp. 130–148) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sumner, L. W. (2000). Something in between. In R. Crisp & B. Hooker (Eds.), Well-being and morality; essays in honour of James Griffin (pp. 1–19) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Szabo, A. (2000). Physical activity as a source of psychological dysfunction. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), Physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 130–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taylor, A. H. (2000). Physical activity, anxiety and stress. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), Physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 10–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Landuyt, L., M., Ekkekakis, P., Hall, E. E., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2000). Throwing the Mountains Into the Lakes: On the Perils of Nomothetic Conceptions of the Exercise – Affect Relationship. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 208–34.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vittersø, J. (2004). Subjective well-being versus self-actualization: Using the flow simplex to provide conceptual clarification of subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65, 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vuori, I. (2004). Inactivity as a disease risk and health benefits of increased physical activity. In P. Oja & J. Borms (Eds.), Health enhancing physical activity (pp. 29–95). Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health Science, Centre for Philosophy, Humanities and Law in HealthcareUniversity of Wales SwanseaSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations