Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 327–356 | Cite as

Breaking Silos: A Field Experiment on Relational Conflict Management in Cross-Functional Teams

  • Smaranda Boroş
  • Lore van Gorp
  • Brecht Cardoen
  • Robert Boute
Article
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we investigate how effective conflict management in conflict asymmetry situations impacts the quality of cross-functional management teams’ performance. During a 5-day business simulation, we explore the consequences of the relational conflicts and conflict asymmetry experienced by team members. We use two different measures of conflict asymmetry: the traditional group conflict asymmetry measurement of Jehn (Adm Sci Q 40:256–282, 1995) and a social networks method. We find that when some team members evoke more conflict than others, this affects the evolution of team dynamics (and ultimately the performance of the team) even more than high levels of conflict altogether; however, group emotional awareness can mitigate this negative effect and improve the team performance through the appropriate use of conflict management strategies. Since group emotional awareness can be fostered and trained within teams, this is of practical value to improve the performance of cross-functional management teams.

Keywords

Relational conflict asymmetry Conflict management strategies Cross-functional teams Group emotional awareness Integration management Social networks Field experiment 

Abbreviations

CMS

Conflict management styles

GEA

Group emotional awareness

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Vlerick Academic Research Fund, partially subsidized by the Flemish government, for their financial support to execute this research project.

References

  1. Anderson N, West MA (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 19:235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: evidence from the field. Manag Sci 58(1):78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayoko OB, Callen VJ, Härtel CEL (2008) The influence of emotional climate on conflict and team members’ reaction to climate. Small Group Res 39:121–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2012) Group affect its influence on individual and group outcomes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21(2):119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behfar K, Peterson R, Mannix EA, Trochim W (2008) The critical role of conflict resolution in team: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J Appl Psychol 93:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell C, Song F (2005) Emotions in the conflict process: an application of the cognitive appraisal model of emotions to conflict management. Int J Confl Manag 16:30–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettenhausen KL (1991) Five years of group research: what have we learned and what needs to be addressed. J Manag 17:345–381Google Scholar
  8. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Boroş S, Curşeu PL (2011) Group emotional regulation: at the cross-roads between individuals, norms and situations. In: Conference proceedings. The 16th general meeting 2011 of the European Association of Social Psychology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. Boroş S, Curşeu PL (2013) ‘Would you like to talk about that?’ How and when group emotional awareness enhances effectiveness of gender diverse teams. Psihol Resur Umane 11(2):45–56Google Scholar
  11. Boroş S, Meslec M, Curşeu P, Emons W (2010) Struggles for cooperation: conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups. J Manag Psychol 25:539–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boute R, Rangarajan D (2012) Sales & operations alignment: what will it take? Working paper, Vlerick Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen CQ, Liu CH, Tjosvold D (2005) Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. J Manag Stud 42:277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen NY, Lu J, Tjosvold D (2008) Effects of team goal interdependence on newcomer socialization: an experiment in China. J Appl Psychol 38:198–214Google Scholar
  15. Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad Manag Rev 32:761–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Curşeu PL, Kenis P, Raab J, Brandes U (2010) Composing effective teams through team dating. Organ Stud 31(7):873–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curşeu P, Boroş S, Oerlemans L (2012a) Task and relationship conflict in ad-hoc and permanent groups: the critical role of emotion regulation. Int J Confl Manag 23:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curşeu P, Schruijer SGL, Boroş S (2012b) Socially rejected while cognitively successful? The impact of minority dissent on groups’ cognitive complexity. Br J Soc Psychol 51:570–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Dreu CKW, van Vianen AEM (2001) Responses to relationship conflict and team effectiveness. J Organ Behav 22:309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 88:741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Dreu CKW, Beersma B (2005) Conflict in organizations: beyond effectiveness and performance. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  22. De Wit FRC, Jehn KA, Scheepers D (2011) Negotiating within groups: a psychophysiological approach. In: Mannix E, Neale M, Overbeck JR (eds) Research on managing groups and teams, vol 14. Emerald, BingleyGoogle Scholar
  23. De Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 97:360–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Wit FR, Jehn KA, Scheepers D (2013) Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: the damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 122(2):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desivilya HS, Yagil D (2005) The role of emotions in conflict management: the case of work teams. Int J Confl Manag 16:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deutsch M (1973) The resolution of conflict: constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  27. Dineen BR, Noe RA, Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Wiethoff C (2007) Level and dispersion of satisfaction in teams: using foci and social context to explain the satisfaction–absenteeism relationship. Acad Manag J 50:623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Druskat VU, Wolff SB (2001) Building the emotional intelligence of groups. Harv Bus Rev 79:81–90Google Scholar
  29. Druskat V, Druskat P (2006) Applying emotional intelligence in project working. In: Pryke S, Smyth H (eds) The management of complex projects: a relationship approach. Blackwell, London, pp 78–96Google Scholar
  30. Eby LT, Meade AW, Parisi AG, Douthitt SS (1999) The development of an individual level groupwork expectations measure and the application of a within-group agreement statistic to access shared expectations for groupwork. Organ Res Methods 2:366–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elfenbein HA (2006) Team emotional intelligence: what it can mean and how it can impact performance. In: Druskat V, Sala F, Mount G (eds) The link between emotional intelligence and effective performance. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 165–184Google Scholar
  32. Elfenbein HA, Polzer JT, Ambady N (2007) Team emotion recognition accuracy and team performance. In: Ashkanasy NM, Zerbe WJ, Härtel CEJ (eds) Res Emot Organ, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–119Google Scholar
  33. Ford C, Sullivan DM (2004) A time for everything: how the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. J Organ Behav 25:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. George JM (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. J Appl Psychol 75:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greer LL, Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2008) Conflict transformation: an exploration of the inter-relationships between task, relationship, and process conflict. Small Group Res 39:278–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization science 16(3):290–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol Bull 121:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: evidence from a field experiment. Manag Sci 59(7):1514–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoyle L (2004) Clash of the Titans–conflict resolution using a contextualized mediation process. Working below the surface. The emotional life of contemporary organizations. Karnac, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q 40:256–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jehn KA (1997) Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm Sci Q 42:530–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jehn KA, Rispens S, Thatcher SMB (2010) The effects of conflict asymmetry on workgroup and individual outcomes. Acad Manag J 53:596–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jehn KA, Rispens S, Thatcher SMB (2012) Managing conflict in groups and teams: conflict about conflict. In: Neale MA, Mannix EA (eds) Looking back, moving forward: a review of group and team-based research (research on managing groups and teams), vol 15. Emerald, Bingley, pp 133–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jehn KA, De Wit FRC, Baretto M, Rink F (2015) Task conflict asymmetries: effects on expectations and performance. Int J Confl Manag 26(2):172–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jordan PJ, Troth AC (2002) Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution: implications for human resource development. Adv Dev Hum Resour 4:62–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jordan PJ, Troth AC (2004) Managing emotions during team problem solving: emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Hum Perform 17:195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koolhaas JM, Bartolomucci A et al (2011) Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:1291–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kuhn T, Poole MS (2000) Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? Evidence from a longitudinal field study. Hum Commun Res 26:558–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ Res Methods 11:815–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lovelace K, Shapiro DL, Weingart LR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Acad Manag J 44(4):779–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mooney AC, Holahan PJ, Amason AC (2007) Don’t take it personally: exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. J Manag Stud 44:733–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neuman EJ (2012) Blind spots and mirages: a dyadic approach to the study of team conflict. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, vol 2012, No. 1, p. 1. Academy of ManagementGoogle Scholar
  53. Pagell M (2004) Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J Oper Manag 22:459–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parayitam S, Dooley RS (2009) The interplay between cognitive- and affective conflict and cognition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. J Bus Res 62:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterson RS, Behfar KJ (2003) The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: a longitudinal study. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 92(1):102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prell C (2012) Social network analysis: history, theory and methodology. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Rahim MA (2002) Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. Int J Confl Manag 13:206–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rapisarda B (2002) The impact of emotional intelligence on work team cohesiveness and performance. Int J Organ Anal 10:363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rempel MW, Fisher RJ (1997) Perceived threat, cohesion, and group problem solving in intergroup conflict. Int J Confl Manag 8:216–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rispens S, Greer LL, Jehn KA, Thatcher SMB (2011) Not so bad after all: how relational closeness buffers the effect of relationship conflict on helpful and deviant group behaviors. Negot Confl Manag Res 4:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagin Cogn Pers 9:186–211Google Scholar
  62. Shih HA, Susanto E (2010) Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence, and job performance in public organizations. Int J Confl Manag 21:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simons T, Peterson R (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. J Appl Psychol 83:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc Psychol Intergroup Relat 33:47Google Scholar
  65. Tekleab AG, Quigley NR, Tesluk PE (2009) A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group Organ Manag 34:170–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ury W, Brett J, Goldberg S (1989) Getting disputes resolved: designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  67. Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. J Manag 27(2):141–162Google Scholar
  68. Weingart LR, Todorova G, Cronin MA (2008) Representational gaps, team integration, and team creativity. Paper presented at the conference of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA, Aug 2008Google Scholar
  69. Widman KF, Thomson JS (2003) On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychol Methods 8:16–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang J, Mossholder KW (2004) Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing. J Organ Behav 25:589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zárraga C, Bonache J (2005) The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams. Organ Stud 26:661–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang X, Cao Q, Tjosvold D (2011) Linking transformational leadership and team performance: a conflict management approach. J Manag Stud 48:1586–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vlerick Business SchoolBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations