Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 901–922 | Cite as

Accelerated Multi-Organization Conflict Resolution

  • Fran Ackermann
  • Colin Eden
  • Igor Pyrko
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss two situations where two organizations with different aims recognized the dysfunctionality of their relationship. In each of these cases, which were long running (6–8 months), the organizations had worked hard to resolve this dysfunctionality, and conflict, by organizing off-site meetings designed to resolve the conflict. These 1-day meetings failed. Subsequently Group Support System workshops were used for 1 day workshops and in each case the conflict was essentially resolved within 55 min. The research reported in this paper seeks to answer the question: what happened in these cases that led to a resolution of the conflict in such a short time period, given other attempts had failed? Specifically the paper explores the impact of the GSS used to facilitate two organizations seeking to resolve a conflictual situation.

Keywords

Conflict resolution Group Support Systems Causal mapping Multi-organization 

References

  1. Ackermann F, Andersen DF, Eden C, Richardson GP (2011) ScriptsMap: a tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops. Omega 39:427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann F, Eden C (2005) Using causal mapping with group support systems to elicit an understanding of failure in complex projects: some implications for organizational research. Group Decis Negot 14:355–376. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-8917-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackermann F, Eden C (2010) The role of group decision support systems: negotiating safe energy. In: Kilgour M, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011) Negotiation in strategy making teams: group support systems and the process of cognitive change. Group Decis Negot 20:293–314. doi: 10.1007/s10726-008-9133-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackermann F, Franco LA, Gallupe B, Parent M (2005) GSS for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decis Negot 14:307–331. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-0317-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agres A, de Vreede G-J, Briggs R (2005) A tale of two cities: case studies of group support systems transition. Group Decis Negot 14:267–284. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-0315-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anson RG, Jelassi MT (1990) Group decision and negotiation support systemsa development framework for computer-supported conflict resolution. Eur J Oper Res 46:181–199. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90131-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Attenborough D (2002) Life on the air. BBC Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Belmondo C, Sargis-Roussel C (2015) Negotiating language, meaning and intention: strategy infrastructure as the outcome of using a strategy tool through transforming strategy objects. Br J Manag 26:S90–S104. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Black LJ, Andersen DF (2012) Using visual representations as boundary objects to resolve conflict in collaborative model-building approaches. Syst Res Behav Sci 29:194–208. doi: 10.1002/sres.2106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryson JM, Ackermann F, Eden C, Finn CB (2004) Visible thinking—unlocking causal mapping for practical results. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM (2006) The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev 66:44–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci 13:442–455. doi: 10.2307/3085976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Combe IA, Carrington DJ (2015) Leaders’ sensemaking under crises: emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams. Leadersh Q. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002
  16. Conklin J (2006) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  17. Cronin K, Midgley G, Jackson LS (2014) Issues mapping: a problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts. Eur J Oper Res 233:145–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crump L (2010) Strategically managing negotiation linkage dynamics. Negot Confl Manag Res 3:3–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2009.00046.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Geus A (1988) Planning as learning. Harv Bus Rev 70–74Google Scholar
  20. DeSanctis G, Gallupe B (1985) Group decision support systems: a new frontier database. Winter 3–9 doi: 10.1145/1040688.1040689
  21. Druckman D (2009) Intuition or counterintuition? The science behind the art of negotiation. Negot J 25:431–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00237.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher R, Ury W (1981) Getting to yes: negotiating agreements without giving in. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Franco LA, Rosenhead J (2001) The role of wide-band GDSS in increasing value for multi-organisational groups: the case of the UK construction industry. In: Ackermann F, Vreede GJ (eds) Group decision and negotiation conference, Delft, The Netherlands, pp 273–278Google Scholar
  24. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgkinson GP, Clarkson GP (2005) What have we learned from almost 30 years of research on causal mapping? Methodological lessons and choices for the information systems and information technology communities. In: Narayanan VK, Armstrong DJ (eds) Causal mapping for research in information technology. Idea Group, London, pp 46–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgkinson GP, Maule AJ, Bown NJ (2004) Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: a comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organ Res Methods 7:3–26. doi: 10.1177/1094428103259556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horst WJR, Melvin MW (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huff AS (1990) Mapping strategic thought. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenkins M, Johnson G (1997) Linking managerial cognition and organizational performance: a preliminary investigation using causal maps. Br J Manag 8:77–90. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.8.s1.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jessup L, Valacich J (1993) Group support systems: new perspectives. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Jessup LM, Tansik DA (1991) Decision making in an automated environment: the effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system*. Decis Sci 22:266–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00346.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelly G (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly G (1963) A theory of personality: the psychology of personal constructs W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim WC, Mauborgne R (1998) Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strateg Manag J 19:323–338Google Scholar
  35. Lewis LF (2010) Group support systems: overview and guided tour. In: Kilgour DM, Eden C (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maitlis S, Christianson M (2013) Sensemaking in organizations. Acad Manag Ann 57–125. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2014.873177
  37. Mangham I (1979) Politics of organizational change. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  38. Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  39. Miranda SM, Bostrom RP (1993) The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. J Manage Inf Syst 10:63–95. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1993.11518011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paroutis S, Franco LA, Papadopoulos T (2015) Visual interactions with strategy tools: producing strategic knowledge in workshops. Br J Manag 26:S48–S66. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrow C (1986) Complex organization, 3rd edn. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case ot Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J Manag Stud 26:397–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00736.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw D (2003) Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the /‘brainstormed/’ ideas. J Oper Res Soc 54:692–705. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swan J (1997) Using cognitive mapping in management research: decisions about technical innovation. Br J Manag 8:183–198. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.0050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tavella E, Franco LA (2014) Dynamics of group knowledge production in facilitated modelling workshops: an exploratory study group. Decis Negot 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10726-014-9398-2
  46. Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003) The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 7:349–361. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valacich JS, Dennis AR, Nunamaker JF Jr (1991) Electronic meeting support: the GroupSystems concept. Int J Man-Machine Stud 34:261–282. doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90044-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vangen S, Huxham C (2003) Nurturing collaborative relations: building trust in interorganizational collaboration. J Appl Behav Sci 39:5–31. doi: 10.1177/0021886303039001001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ Sci 6:280–321. doi: 10.2307/2635252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  51. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16:409–421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winnicott DW (1953) Transitional objects and transitional phenomena; a study of the first not-me possession. Int J Psych-Anal 34:89–97Google Scholar
  53. Zartman IW (1977) Negotiation as a joint decision-making process. J Confl Resolut 21:619–638. doi: 10.2307/173615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin Business SchoolCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations