Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 561–577 | Cite as

Menu Dependence and Group Decision Making



This paper is concerned with the problem of group decision making. We introduce the notion of a collective system rule. A collective system rule maps each preference profile to a group-preference system, which is a collection of social preferences on the subsets of the alternatives. By formulating the Arrovian conditions, we show the Arrow-type impossibility theorems. We also discuss how our approach is related to the standard group decision-making process.


Collective system rule Group decision making  Arrow’s impossibility theorem Preference system Nestedness   Menu-dependent preference 



I am grateful to three anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions. This paper was financially supported by MEXT and the Zengin Foundation for Studies on Economics and Finance.


  1. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ, Raynaud H (1986) Social choice and multicriterion decision-making. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordes G (1976) Consistency, rationality and collective choice. Rev Econ Stud 43:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossert W, Suzumura K (2011) Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus. Soc Choice Welf 37:729–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell DK, Kelly JS (2002) Impossibility theorems in the Arrovian framework. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 35–94Google Scholar
  6. Cato S (2010) Brief proofs of Arrovian impossibility theorems. Soc Choice Welf 35:267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferejohn JA, Grether DM (1977) Weak path independence. J Econ Theory 14:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franssen M (2005) Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute preferences in engineering design. Res Eng Des 16:42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaertner W (2009) A primer in social choice theory (revised edition). Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbard A (1969) Social choice and the arrow condition (unpublished paper)Google Scholar
  11. Grether DM, Plott CR (1982) Nonbinary social choice: an impossibility theorem. Rev Econ Stud 49: 143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guha A (1972) Neutrality, monotonicity, and the right of veto. Econometrica 40:821–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalai G, Rubinstein A, Spiegler R (2002) Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica 70:2481–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Munda G (2004) Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur J Oper Res 158:662–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mas-Colell A, Sonnenschein H (1972) General possibility theorems for group decisions. Rev Econ Stud 39:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Plott CR (1973) Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica 41:1075–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saaty TL (1999) Basic theory of the analytic hierarchy process. Rev R Acad Cienc Exact Fis Nat (Esp) 93:395–423Google Scholar
  19. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:83–98Google Scholar
  20. Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. Sen AK (1977) Social choice theory: a re-examination. Econometrica 45:53–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sen AK (1979) Personal utilities and public judgments: or what’s wrong with welfare economics? Econ J 89:537–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sen AK (1993) Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica 61:495–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sen AK (1995) Rationality and social choice. Am Econ Rev 85:1–24Google Scholar
  25. Sen AK (1997) Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica 65:745–779Google Scholar
  26. Simon HA (1957) Models of man. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. Decis Organ 1:161–176Google Scholar
  28. Simon HA (1997) Administrative behavior, 4th edn. The Macmillan Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 69:493–513Google Scholar
  30. Suzumura K (1983) Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tyson CJ (2008) Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion. J Econ Theory 138:51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social SciencesTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachioji-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations