Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 259–279 | Cite as

Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making

  • Meimei Xia
  • Zeshui Xu
  • Na Chen


Hesitancy is the most common problem in decision making, for which hesitant fuzzy set can be considered as a suitable means allowing several possible degrees for an element to a set. In this paper, we study the aggregation of the hesitancy fuzzy information. Several series of aggregation operators are proposed and the connections of them are discussed. To reflect the correlation of the aggregation arguments, two methods are proposed to determine the aggregation weight vectors. Based on the support degrees among aggregation arguments, the weight vector of decision makers are obtained more objectively. To deal with the correlation of criteria, we apply the Choquet integral to get the weights of criteria. A method is also proposed for group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment.


Group decision making Hesitant fuzzy set Aggregation operator Weight vector 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20: 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Büyüközkan G, Mauris G, Berrah L, Feyzioğlu O (2003) Providing elucidations of Web site evaluation based on a multi-criteria aggregation. In: Proceedings of the international fuzzy systems association world congress (IFSA), Istanbul, Turkey, pp 131–134Google Scholar
  3. Büyüközkan G, Feyzioğlu O, Ersoy MS (2009) Evaluation of 4PL operating models: a decision making approach based on 2-additive Choquet integral. Int J Product Econ 121: 112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Büyüközkan G, Ruan D (2010) Coquet integral based aggregation approach to software development risk assessment. Inf Sci 180: 441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen TY (2011) Optimistic and pessimistic decision making with dissonance reduction using interval-valued fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181: 479–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choquet G (1953) Theory of capacities. Ann Inst Fourier (Crenoble) 5: 131–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denneberg D (1994) Non-additive measure and integral. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fodor J, Marichal JL, Roubens M (1995) Characterization of the ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3: 236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grabisch M (1997) K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 92: 167–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G (1934) Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78: 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2009) The induced generalized OWA operator. Inf Sci 179: 729–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Merigó JM, Casanovas M (2011) The uncertain induced Quasi-arithmetic OWA Operator. Int J Intell Syst 26: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mesiar R, Mesiarová-Zemánková A (2011) The ordered modular averages. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19: 42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miyamoto S (2000) Multisets and fuzzy multisets. In: Liu Z-Q, Miyamoto S (eds) Soft computing and human-centered machines. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyamoto S (2005) Remarks on basics of fuzzy sets and fuzzy multisets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 156: 427–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sugeno M (1974) Theory of fuzzy integral and its application. Doctoral dissertation, Tokyo Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  19. Tan CQ, Chen XH (2009) Induced Choquet ordered averaging operator and its application to group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 25: 59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tan CQ, Chen XH (2010). Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making. Exp Syst Appl 37: 149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25: 529–539Google Scholar
  22. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: The 18th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Jeju Island, Korea, pp 1378–1382Google Scholar
  23. Wang Z, Klir G (1992) Fuzzy measure theory. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang JH, Hao J (2006) A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14: 435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52: 395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xia MM, Xu ZS, Chen N (2011) Induced aggregation under confidence levels. Int J Uncert Fuzz Knowl Based Syst 19: 201–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu ZS (2004) A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 166: 19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33: 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu ZS (2009) Correlated linguistic information aggregation. Int J Uncert Fuzz Knowl Based Syst 17: 633–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu ZS (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 180: 726–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu ZS (2011) Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl Based Syst 24: 749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2010) Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 9: 359–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2011) Uncertain power average operators for aggregating interval fuzzy preference relations. Group Decis Negot, doi: 10.1007/s10726-010-9213-7
  34. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011a) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181: 2128–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011b) On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst 26: 410–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011c) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl Based Syst 24: 197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2010) Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18: 94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yager RR (1986) On the theory of bags. Int J General Syst 13: 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18: 183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yager RR (2001) The power average operator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 31: 724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yager RR (2004) Choquet aggregation using order inducing variables. Int J Uncertaint Fuzz Knowl Based Syst 12: 69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yager RR, Filev DP (1999) Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 29: 141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8: 199–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations