Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 137–154 | Cite as

A Framework for Adopting Collaboration 2.0 Tools for Virtual Group Decision Making

  • Efraim Turban
  • Ting-Peng Liang
  • Shelly P. J. Wu
Article

Abstract

Decision making in virtual teams is gaining momentum due to globalization, mobility of employees, and the need for collective and rapid decision making by members who are in different locations. These factors resulted in a proliferation of virtual team software support tools for decision making, the latest of which is social software (also known as collaboration 2.0), which includes tools such as wikis, blogs, microblogs, discussion forums, and social networking platforms. This paper describes the potential use of collaboration 2.0 software for improving the process and the specific tasks in virtual group decision making. The paper proposes a framework for exploring the fitness between social software and the major activities in the group decision making process and how such tools can be successfully adopted. Specifically, we use a fit-viability model to help assessing whether social software fit a decision task and what organizational factors are important for such tools to be effective. Representative research issues related to the use of such tools are also presented.

Keywords

Blogs Collective intelligence Collaborative decision making Discussion forums Enterprise 2.0 Group support systems Social networks Social software Web 2.0 Wikis Virtual teams 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernoff J, Li C (2008) Harnessing the power of the Oh-So-Social web. MIT Sloan manage Rev 49(3): 36–42Google Scholar
  2. Bjelland OM, Wood RC (2008) An inside view of IBM’s innovation jam. MIT Sloan manage Rev 50(1): 32–41Google Scholar
  3. Brake T (2009) Where in the world is my team: making a success of your virtual global workplace. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee AP (2007) Beyond enterprise 2.0. MIT sloan management review spring. pp 50–55Google Scholar
  5. Cohn ML, Sim SE, Lee CP (2009) What counts as software process? Negotiating the boundary of software work through artifacts and conversation. Compt Support Coop Work 18: 401–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman D, Levine S (2008) Collaboration 2.0: technology and best practices for successful collaboration in a Web 2.0 world. Happy about info publishing companyGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman D, Khanna R (1995) Groupware technology and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis AR, Wixom BH, Vandenberg RJ (2001) Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Q 25(2): 167–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeSanctis G, Gallupe RB (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manage Sci 33(5): 589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher BA (1970) Decision emergence: phases in good decision making. Speech Monogr 37(1): 53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fjermestad J, Hiltz S (1998) An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J Manage Inf Syst 15(3): 7–149Google Scholar
  12. Gibson S (2009) Web 2.0 tools gain enterprise acceptance. eWeek, April 6Google Scholar
  13. Goodhue DL (1995) Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage Sci 41(12): 1827–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 22(3): 231–236Google Scholar
  15. Guerrero LA, Pino JA (2009) Supporting discussions for decision meetings. Group Decis Negot 18(6): 589–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jessup LM, Valacich JS (1993) Group support systems: new perspective. McMillan Publishing Company, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Kane GC, Fichman RG (2009) The shoemaker’s children: using wikis for information systems teaching, research, and publication. MIS Q 33(1): 1–17Google Scholar
  18. King R (2008) How companies use Twitter to bolster their brands. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2008/tc2008095_320491.htm
  19. Konicki S (2002) Now in bankruptcy, Kmart struggled with supply chain. Information week Jan 22Google Scholar
  20. Kudaravalli S, Faraj S (2008) The structure of collaboration in electronic networks. J Assoc Inf Syst 9(10): 706–726Google Scholar
  21. Lai L, Turban E (2008) Group formation and operations in Web 2.0 environment and social networks. Group Decis Negot 17: 387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li D, Chau PYK (2009) Acceptance of internet-based services: a comparison of three models. Pac Asia J Assoc Inf Syst 1(3): 1–24Google Scholar
  23. Liang TP, Huang ZW, Yeh YH, Lin B (2007) Adoption of mobile technology in business: a fit-viability model. Indus Manage Data Syst 107(8): 1154–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang TP (1988) Model management for group decision support. MIS Q 12(4): 667–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacGregor SP, Torres-Coronas T (2007) Higher creativity for virtual teams. IGI Group, Hershey, PAGoogle Scholar
  26. Majchrzak A (2007) The promise of passion of collective wisdom through wikis and the wiki way. Thinking Network, California, pp 12–17Google Scholar
  27. McAfee AP (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 47(3): 21–29Google Scholar
  28. McAfee AP (2009) Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization’s toughest challenges. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. Nosek JT, McManus M (2008) Collaboration challenges: bridging the IT support gap. Inf Syst Manage 25(1): 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nunamaker JF Jr, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel DR, George JF (1991) Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun the ACM 34(7): 40–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Donnel J, Jackson M, Shelly M, Ligertwood J (2007) Australian case studies in mobile commerce. J Theo Appl Elec Commerce Res 2(2): 1–18Google Scholar
  32. Raman (2006) Wiki technology as a free collaborative tool within an organizational setting. Inf Syst Manage 23(4): 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rutledge P (2008) The truth about profiting from social networking. FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  34. Sangwan S, Guan C, Siguaw JA (2009) Virtual social networks: toward a research agenda. Intl J of Virtual Commun Soc Netw 1(1): 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sari B, Schaffers H, Kristensen K, Loh H, Slagter R (2008) Collaborative knowledge workers: web tools and workplace paradigms enabling enterprise collaboration 2.0. http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/d1083684/Collaborative_Knowledge_Workers_eChallenges_Final.pdf
  36. Schlegel et al (2009) The rise of collaborative decision making. Research note G00164718, Gartner Inc., http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/microsoft/vol6/article8/article8.html
  37. Schmidt K, Bannon L. (1992) Taking CSCW seriously. Compt Support Collab Work 1(1): 7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shuen A (2008) Web 2.0: A strategy guide. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. Siebdart F, Hoegel M, Ernst H (2009) How to manage virtual teams. MIT Sloan Manage Rev Summer 2009: 63–68Google Scholar
  40. Socialtext (2009) Five biggest blunders to avoid with enterprise collaboration. http://www.socialtext.com/offers/wp_blunders_google.php?&utm_source=biz&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=bsnetwork. Accessed Dec 2009.
  41. Spinellis D, Louridas P (2008) The collaborative organization of knowledge. Commun of the ACM 51(8): 68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Srinvas BG (2008) Collaboration 2.0: From execution to orchestration- –lessons for manufacturers from Davos. http://www.infosys.com/manufacturing/resource-center/Pages/collaboration.aspx
  43. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Doubleday Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Tedeschi B (2008) Putting innovation in the hands of a crowd. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/technology/03ecom.html.
  45. Thierauf RJ (1989) Group decision support systems for effective decision making: a guide for MIS practitioners and end users. Wuorum Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Tjan AK (2001) Finally, a way to put your internet portfolio in order. Harvard Bus Rev 79(2): 76–85Google Scholar
  47. Tubbs S (1995) A systems approach to small group interaction. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Tuckman B (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull 63: 384–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wagner C, Bolloju N (2005) Supporting knowledge management in organizations with conversational technologies: discussion forums, weblogs and wikis. J Database Manage 16(2): i–viiiGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner C, Majchrzak A (2007) Enabling customer-centricity using wikis and the wiki way. J Manage Inf Syst 23(3): 17–43Google Scholar
  51. Welbourne TM, Pardo-del-Val M (2009) Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Group Decis Negot 18: 483–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ybarra M (2008) From LinkedIn to SharePoint, CIOs see Web 2.0 benefits. http://searchcio-midmarket.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid183_gci1341716,00.html. Accessed Dec 2009
  53. Zigurs L, Buckland BK (1998) A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q 22(3): 313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Efraim Turban
    • 1
  • Ting-Peng Liang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shelly P. J. Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.National Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.City University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations