Abstract
Theoretical structures are developed to account for the impact of emotion and perception in strategic conflict. In particular, the possibility principle facilitates modeling the effects of emotions on future scenarios contemplated by decision makers, while perceptual graph models and the associated graph model system permit the decision makers to experience and view the conflict independently. These new theoretical advances expand current modeling capabilities, thereby furnishing realistic, descriptive models without exacting too great a cost in modeling complexity. Specifically, these developments enhance the applicability of the modeling algorithms within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution to real-world disputes by integrating emotion and perception, common ingredients in almost all conflicts. To demonstrate that the new developments are practical, an illustrative application to a real-world conflict is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechara A, Damasio AR (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav 52: 336–372. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
Bennett PG (1977) Toward a theory of hypergames. Omega 5(6): 749–751. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(77)90056-1
Bennett PG (1980) Hypergames: developing a model of conflicts. Futures 12(6): 489–507. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(80)90005-1
Caddy JF (2001) The Caddy report: the Lobster Resource in the Miramichi Bay. The State of Knowledge of the Lobster Resource in the Miramichi Bay and Adjacent Waters; Some Suggestions for Conflict Resolution over Fishing Seasons, and Ideas for Fisheries Research in Support of Lobster Management. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/
Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam’s Sons, New York
Damasio AR (2003) Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Harcourt, Orlando, FL
Dunn JR, Schweitzer ME (2005) Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 88(5): 736–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (1993) Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. Wiley, New York
Fraser N, Hipel KW (1984) Conflict analysis: models and resolutions. North Holland, New York
Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Howard N, Bennett PG, Bryant J, Bradley M (1992) Manifesto for a theory of drama and irrational choice. J Oper Res Soc 44: 99–103. doi:10.2307/2584447
Inohara T (2000) Interperceptional equilibrium as a generalization of Nash equilibrium in games with interperception. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 30(6): 625–638
Jones TS, Bodtker A (2001) Mediating with heart in mind: addressing emotion in mediation practice. Negotiat J 17(3): 217–244. doi:10.1023/A:1013283710190
LeDoux J (2000) Cognitive-emotional interaction: listen to the brain. In: Lane RD, Nadel L Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. Oxford University Press, New York
Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2003) Emotion: the missing ingredient in conflict analysis. In: Proceedings the 2003 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, Washington, D.C., October 5–8, pp 3322–3329
Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2005a) Perception and Emotion in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. In: Proceedings the 2005 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Hilton Waikoloa Village, The Big Island of Hawaii, October 9–12, pp 1126–1131
Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2005b) The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis. Group Decis Negotiat 14(6): 481–500. doi:10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8
Obeidi A, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2006) Turbulence in Miramichi Bay: the Burnt Church conflict over native Fishing Rights. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(6):1629–1645. JAWRA. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb06025.x
Supreme Court of Canada (1999a) R. v. Marshall. File No. 26014, September 17. http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1999/vol3/html/1999scr3_0456.html
Supreme Court of Canada (1999b) R. v. Marshall. File No. 26014, November 17. http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1999/vol3/html/1999scr3_0533.html
Wang M, Hipel KW, Fraser NM (1988) Modeling misperception in games. Behav Sci 33(3): 207–223. doi:10.1002/bs.3830330305
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Obeidi, A., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. Perceptual Graph Model Systems. Group Decis Negot 18, 261–277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9154-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9154-6