Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 401–412 | Cite as

An analysis of transcripts and enzyme profiles in drought stressed jute (Corchorus capsularis) and rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings treated with CaCl2, hydroxyapatite nano-particle and β-amino butyric acid

  • Aniket Das
  • Rudra Ray
  • Nilanjan Mandal
  • Krishanu Chakrabarti
Original paper


In the following work we have identified and isolated transcripts induced upon treatment of jute (JRC 412) seeds with as elicitors through the differential display analysis. We have tried an approach of pre-treatment of jute seeds with CaCl2 (calcium chloride), CaNP (hydroxyapatite nano-particle) and BABA (β-amino butyric acid) as elicitors to study the changes in both biochemical parameters and transcriptomic changes. Rice was chosen as the biological replicate model for the enzymatic changes involved. Several genes including the Late Embryogenesis Abundant protein, Dehydration Responsive Element along with the biochemical markers like proline and peroxidase associated with the priming and Systemic Acquired Resistance of the jute seedlings were found to be up-regulated under the effect of the elicitors. The significance of the isolated differentially expressed genes has been discussed in the light of these findings and there was distinct similarity in the enzyme profile that suggested that biosynthesis and control of proline levels in stressed plants was central to the survival strategy.


Drought Elicitors CaCl2 (calcium chloride) CaNP (hydroxyapatite nano-particle) BABA (β-amino butyric acid) DD (differential display) SAR (Systemic Acquired Resistance) 



This work has been funded by the Department of Biotechnology (WB-DBT) West Bengal, India and supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), University Grants Commission (UGC) India, and the DBT-IPLS, University of Calcutta.

Supplementary material

10725_2015_144_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (83 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 82 kb)


  1. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15(1):63–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves C, Silva AJ, Reis LG (2010) Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Clean Prod 18(4):313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakhnina T, Borkowska A (2013) Effects of silicon on plant resistance to environmental stresses: review. Int. Agrophys. 27:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A, Roychowdhury A (2015), Group II late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins: structural and functional aspects in plant abiotic stress. Plant Growth Regul. doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0113-3 Google Scholar
  5. Bates L, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battaglia M, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Garciarrubio A, Campos F, Covarrubias A (2008) The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol 2008(148):6–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beers E, Sizer I (1952) A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem 195:133–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Belwal T, Bisht A, Bhatt I, Rawal R (2015) Influence of seed priming and storage time on germination and enzymatic activity of selected Berberis species. Plant Growth Regul 77(2):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho M (2008) Drought stress and reactive oxygen species production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal Behaviour 3(3):156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavalieri J, Huang H (1979) Evaluation of proline accumulation in the adaptation of diverse species of marsh halophytes to the saline environment. Am J Bot 66(3):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen G, Asada K (1989) Ascorbate peroxidase in tea leaves: occurrence of two isozymes and the differences in their enzymatic and molecular properties. Plant Cell Physiol 1989(30):87–98Google Scholar
  12. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2006) Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Current Opinion Plant Biology 2006(9):436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghareeb H, Bozsó Z, Peter G, Repenning C, Stahl F, Wydra K (2011) Transcriptome of silicon-induced resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum in the silicon non-accumulator tomato implicates priming effect. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 75:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill S, Tuteja R (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48(12):909–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni M, Wani A, Pichtel J, Ahmad A (2012) Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal Behav 7(11):1456–1466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kader A, Lindberg S (2010) Cytosolic calcium and pH signaling in plants under salinity stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5(3):233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawano T (2003) Roles of the reactive oxygen species-generating peroxidase reactions in plant defense and growth induction. Plant Cell Rep 2003(21):829–837Google Scholar
  18. Khondker OA, Ishiaku US, Nakai A, Hamada H (2006) A novel processing technique for thermoplastic manufacturing of unidirectional composites reinforced with jute yarns Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37(12):2274–2284Google Scholar
  19. Kishor P, Sangam S, Amrutha R et al (2005) Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88(3):424Google Scholar
  20. Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012) Drought, salt and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err460 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Proline measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193(1):265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma J (2004) Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2004(50):11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B, Struik P, Sohrabi Y (2011) Effect of drought stress and subsequent recovery on protein, carbohydrate contents, catalase and peroxidase activities in three chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars. Aust J Crop Sci 5(10):1255–1260Google Scholar
  24. Martin GB, Bogdanove AJ, Sessa G (2003) Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2003(54):23–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mo Y, Yang R, Liu L, Gu X, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li H (2015) Growth, photosynthesis and adaptive responses of wild and domesticated watermelon genotypes to drought stress and subsequent re-watering. Plant Growth Regul. doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0128-9 Google Scholar
  26. Mukhopadhyay A, Dasgupta AK, Chattopadhyay D, Chakrabarti K (2012) Improvement of thermostability and activity of pectate lyase in the presence of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Bioresour Technol 116:348–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng J, Garcia MA, Choi JS, Zhao L, Chen KJ, Bernstein JR, Peyda P, Hsiao YS, Liu KW, Lin WY, Pyle AD, Wang H, Hou S, Tseng HR (2014) Molecular recognition enables nanosubstrate-mediated delivery of gene-encapsulated nanoparticles with high efficiency. ACS Nano 8(5):4621–4629CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Pospisilova J, Haisel D, Vankova R (2011) Responses of transgenic tobacco plants with increased proline content to drought and/or heat stress. Am J Plant Sci 2:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ray R, Ghosh A, Bera A, Dutta N, Chattopadhyay D, Chakrabarti K (2011) Analysis of differentially expressed transcripts in jute upon fungal infection and beta-amino butyric acid treatment. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2011.05.001 Google Scholar
  30. Reddy N, Ali G, Celesnik H, Irene S (2011) Coping with Stresses: roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell 23(6):2010–2032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Shinozaki Y, Shinozaki K (1994) A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress. Plant Cell 6(2):251–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Shoresh M, Harman GE, Mastouri F (2010) Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:21–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Szabados L, Savoure A (2009) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid review. Trends Plant Sci 15(2):89–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang W, Cai Z, Yu J (2008). Study on the Chemical Modification Process of Jute Fiber. J Eng Fibers Fabr 3:1–11Google Scholar
  35. Xiong L, Ishitani M, Zhu J (1999) Interaction of osmotic stress. ABA and low temperature in the regulation of stress gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant Physiol. 1999(119):205–211Google Scholar
  36. Xu T, Lee H, Sy N (2015) Kang H (2014); Wheat zinc finger containing glycine-rich RNA binding protein TaRZ1 affects plant growth and defense response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul 76(3):243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoshioka H, Bouteau F, Kawano T (2008) Discovery of oxidative burst in the field of plant immunity: looking back at the early pioneering works and towards the future development. Plant Signal Behav 2008(3):153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng M, Tao Y, Hussain S, Jiang O, Peng S, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L (2015) Seed priming in dry direct-seeded rice: consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul. doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0083-5 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniket Das
    • 1
  • Rudra Ray
    • 1
  • Nilanjan Mandal
    • 1
  • Krishanu Chakrabarti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations