Response of antioxidant systems in oxygen deprived suspension cultures of rice (Oryza sativa L.)
- 270 Downloads
The effect of oxygen deprivation (anoxia) on the antioxidant system in suspension culture of anoxia-intolerant Malaysian rice mutants cells was examined. Abiotic stresses have been reported to adversely affect cell division, damage cellular and organelle membranes. The signaling defense mechanisms, such as molecular and biochemical aspects responding to stress have been proven to be very complex, and still largely untapped. The objective of this study was to determine the potential involvement of activated oxygen species, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase which occur in cells of rice plants exposed to anoxia stress in two Malaysian rice mutants, MR219-4 and MR219-9, and rice cultivar FR13A which is known to be tolerant to anoxia stress during 5–30 days of exposure. The antioxidative enzymes were decreased for MR219-4 and MR219-9 mutants for CAT and APX activities, and increased in FR13A cultivar starting at 20 days in suspension culture compared to that of control. CAT and APX activities were maintained higher in anoxia condition for all mutants and cultivar. These findings suggested that anoxia stress in suspension cultures induced the level of H2O2 to toxic levels.
KeywordsAntioxidant enzymes Suspension culture Cultivars Periods of stress Rice Anoxia stress
This research was supported by Graduate Research Fund (GRF) of Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).
- Anbazhagan M, Rajendran R, Kalpana M, Natarajan V, Panneerselvam R (2009) Agrobacterium mediated transformation of rice var. Pusa Basmati-1. J Ecol Biotech 1(1):7–11Google Scholar
- Bergmeyer N (1970) Methoden der enzymatischen, analyse, vol 1. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 636–647Google Scholar
- Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stress. In: Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Biologists, Waldorf, pp 1158–1203Google Scholar
- Elstner EF, Osswald W (1994) Mechanisms of oxygen activation during plant stress. Proc Roy Soc Edinb 102B:131–154Google Scholar
- Goldberg DM, Spooner RJ (1983) Glutathione reductase. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol 3. Basel, pp 258–265Google Scholar
- Htwe NN, Maziah M, Ho CL, Zaman FQ, Zain AM (2011) Responses of some selected Malaysian rice genotypes to callus induction under in vitro salt stress. Afr J Biotech 10(3):350–362Google Scholar
- Hung SH, Yu CW, Lin CH (2005) Hydrogen peroxide functions as a stress signal in plants. Bot Bull Acad Sin 46:1–10Google Scholar
- IRRI (1988) Standard evaluation system for rice, 3rd edn. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, p 54Google Scholar
- Lee SH, Ahsan N, Lee KW, Kim DH, Lee DG, Kwak SS, Kwon SY, Kim TH, Lee BH (2007) Simultaneous overexpression of both CuZn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in transgenic tall fescue plants confers increased tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 64:1626–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakano Y, Asada K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-spesific peroxidase in spinach chloroplast. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880Google Scholar
- Shanker AK, Djanaguiraman M, Sudhagar R, Chandrashekar CN, Pathmanabhan G (2004) Differential antioxidative response of ascorbate glutathione pathway enzymes and metabolites to chromium speciation stress in green gram (Vigna radiate (L.) R.Wilczek. cv CO4) roots. Plant Sci 166:1035–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar