Plant Growth Regulation

, 56:179 | Cite as

Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of an alkali-resistant halophyte Suaeda glauca (Bge.)

  • Chunwu Yang
  • Decheng Shi
  • Deli Wang
Original Paper


Effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of Suaeda glauca (Bge.), an alkali-resistant succulent halophyte, were compared. The results showed that alkali stress clearly inhibited the growth of S. glauca. Moreover, the concentrations of Na+ and K+ both increased with increasing salinity under both stresses, suggesting no competitive inhibition between absorptions of Na+ and K+. The mechanism underlying osmotic adjustment during salt stress was similar to alkali stress in shoots. The shared essential features were that organic acids, betaine and inorganic ions (dominated by Na+) mostly accumulated. On the other hand, the mechanisms governing ionic balance under both stresses were different. Under salt stress, S. glauca accumulated organic acids and inorganic anions to maintain the intracellular ionic equilibrium, but the anion contribution of inorganic ions was greater than that of organic acids. However, the concentrations of inorganic anions under alkali stress were significantly lower than those under salt stress of the same intensity, suggesting that alkali stress might inhibit uptake of anions, such as NO3 and H2PO4 . Under alkali stress, organic acids were the dominant factor in maintaining ionic equilibrium. The contribution of organic acids to anions was 74.1%, while that of inorganic anions was only 25.9%. S. glauca enhanced the synthesis of organic acids, dominated by oxalic acid, to compensate for the shortage of inorganic anions.


Alkali stress Ionic balance Osmotic adjustment Salt stress Suaeda glauca (Bge.) 



Dry weight


Fresh weight


Organic acid


Oxalic acid


Relative growth rate


Soluble sugars


Water content



This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30671491 and 30571318), and partly from the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2007CB106800).


  1. Bao SD (1981) Determination of cation. In: Bao SD (ed) Analytic methods for soil and agriculture chemistry. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp 150–160Google Scholar
  2. Blumwald E (2000) Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand JD, Tang C, Rathjen AJ (2002) Screening rough-seeded lupins (Lupinus pilosus Murr. and Lupinus atlanticus Glads.) for tolerance to calcareous soils. Plant Soil 245:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell SA, Nishio JN (2000) Iron deficiency studies of sugar beet using an improved sodium bicarbonate-buffered hydroponics growth system. J Plant Nutr 23:741–757Google Scholar
  5. El-Samad HMA, Shaddad MAK (1996) Comparative effect of sodium carbonate, sodium sulphate, and sodium chloride on the growth and related metabolic activities of pea plants. J Plant Nutr 19:717–728Google Scholar
  6. Ghoulam C, Foursy A, Fares K (2002) Effects of salt-stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environ Exp Bot 47:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grieve CM, Grattan SR (1983) Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary-amino compounds. Plant Soil 70:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartung W, Leport L, Ratcliffe RG, Sauter A, Duda R, Turner NC (2002) Abscisic acid concentration, root pH and anatomy do not explain growth differences of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) on acid and alkaline soils. Plant Soil 240:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. James R, Munns R, Caemmerer SV, Trejo C, Miller C, Condou TAG (2006) Photosynthetic capacity is related to the cellular and subcellular partitioning of Na+, K+ and Cl in salt-affected barley and durum wheat. Plant Cell Environ 29:2185–2197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawanabe S, Zhu TC (1991) Degeneration and conservation of Aneurolepidium chinense grassland in Northern China. J Jpn Grassland Sci 37:91–99Google Scholar
  11. Khan MA (2001) Experimental assessment of salinity tolerance of Ceriops tagal seedlings and saplings from the Indus delta, Pakistan. Aquat Bot 70:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM (1999) Effects of salinity on growth, ion content, and osmotic relations in Halopyrum mocoronatum (L.) Stapf. J Plant Nutr 22:191–204Google Scholar
  13. Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM (2000a) The effect of salinity on the growth, water status, and ion content of a leaf succulent perennial halophyte, Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk. J Arid Environ 45:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM (2000b) Effects of salinity on growth, water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte, Atriplex griffithii var. Stocksii. Ann Bot 85:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kingsbury RW, Epstein E, Peary RW (1984) Physiological responses to salinity in selected lines of wheat. Plant Physiol 74:417–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lissner J, Schierup HH, Comın FA, Astorga V (1999) Effect of climate on the salt tolerance of two Phragmites australis populations. I. Growth, inorganic solutes, nitrogen relations and osmoregulation. Aquat Bot 64:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moghaieb REA, Saneoka H, Fujita K (2004) Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, glycinebetaine accumulation and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression in two halophytic plants, Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritime. Plant Sci 166:1345–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Niu X, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM (1995) Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol 109:735–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nuttall G, Armstrong RD, Connor DJ (2003) Evaluating physicochemical constraints of Calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern Mallee. Aust J Agr Res 5:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 60:324–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sagi M, Dovrat A, Kipnis T, Lips H (1997) Ionic balance, biomass production, and organic nitrogen as affected by salinity and nitrogen source in annual ryegrass. J Plant Nutr 20:1291–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santa-Cruz A, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F, Romero-Aranda R, Bolarin CM (2002) The rootstock effect on the tomato salinity response depends on the shoot genotype. Plant Sci 162:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shi DC, Sheng Y (2005) Effect of various salt-alkaline mixed stress conditions on sunflower seedlings and analysis of their stress factors. Environ Exp Bot 54:8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi DC, Wang DL (2005) Effects of various salt-alkali mixed stresses on Aneurolepidium chinense (Trin.) Kitag. Plant Soil 271:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi DC, Yin LJ (1993) Difference between salt (NaCl) and alkaline (Na2CO3) stresses on Puccinellia tenuiflora (Griseb.) Scribn et Merr. plants. Acta Bot Sin 3:144–149Google Scholar
  27. Shi DC, Zhao KF (1997) Effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 on growth of Puccinellia tenuiflora and on present state of mineral elements in nutrient solution. Acta Pratacu Sin 6:51–61Google Scholar
  28. Shi DC, Yin SJ, Yang GH, Zhao KF (2002) Citric acid accumulation in an alkali-tolerant plant Puccinellia tenuiflora under alkaline stress. Acta Bot Sin 44:537–540Google Scholar
  29. Short DC, Colmer TD (1999) Salt tolerance in the halophyte Halosarcia pergranulata subsp. pergranulata. Ann Bot 83:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang XL (2001) Carboxylic acid. In: Wang XL (ed) Organic chemistry. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 149–150Google Scholar
  31. Wang BS, Zhao KF (1995) Comparison of extractive methods of Na+ and K+ in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol Commun 3:50–52Google Scholar
  32. Yang CW, Chong JN, Kim CM, Li CY, Shi DC, Wang DL (2007) Osmotic adjustment and ion balance traits of an alkali resistant halophyte Kochia sieversiana during adaptation to salt and alkali conditions. Plant Soil 294:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao KF, Fan H, Ungar IA (2002) Survey of halophyte species in China. Plant Sci 163:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng HY, Li JD (1999) Form and dynamic trait of halophyte community. In: Zheng HY, Li JD (eds) Saline plants in Songnen plain and restoration of alkaline-saline grass. Science Press, Beijing, pp 137–138Google Scholar
  35. Zhu GL, Deng XW, Zuo WN (1983) Determination of free proline in plants. Plant Physiol Commun 1:35–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology (Ministry of Education)Northeast Normal UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations