Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 429–439 | Cite as

Genetics of brittleness in wild, domesticated and feral einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) and the place of origin of feral einkorn

  • Andrea BrandoliniEmail author
  • Manfred Heun
Research Article
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

The status of Triticum boeoticum subsp. aegilopoides (Link) Schiem. is somehow confusing, suggesting a need to verify whether this subspecies is a truly wild or a feral form. After reviewing some rather inaccessible older literature, a half-diallel of three pure einkorn lines (truly wild, domesticated and aegilopoides) was performed. The F2 and F3 analyses of brittleness and microscope-based studies of the abscission scars on rachis fragments were combined with extant genome maps. Two QTL segregated in the cross domesticated × wild (one on chromosome 4 and one on chromosome 7), but only one segregated in the cross feral × wild (same as before on chromosome 7), indicating that the feral form carried a wild (or equivalent) allele. Within the cross domesticated × feral, quantitative segregation occurred and could be caused by some neat abscission scars, but without the typical ‘fish-mouth-like’ appearance of the truly wild form. We suggest that aegilopoides and domesticated einkorn emerged in patches of semi-brittle mutants in the Karacadağ Mountains and were collected and maintained by humans. When agriculture moved from South-East Turkey into Western Turkey and later into the Balkans, aegilopoides became the feral form we know today, characterized by a semi-brittle rachis that makes it less wild compared to the truly wild Triticum boeoticum subsp. thaoudar (Reut. ex Hausskn.) Grossh.

Keywords

Abscission scar aegilopoides thaoudar Triticum boeoticum Triticum monococcum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Dr. Andrea Volante for his skillful management of the progenies and for scoring the brittleness of the F2 spikes. Dr. Rosanna Marino significantly contributed in the preparation of the molecular maps. Appreciation goes to Dr. Massimo Confalonieri for his assistance in the photographs of the abscission scars. Prof. RTJ Cappers kindly allowed MH the examination of the Çayönü material. Special thanks to Prof. F. Salamini and Prof. B.I. Honne for critically reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Norway (Grant No. 1750030012; Title: Bidrag til genetiske analyser).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10722_2018_721_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (71 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 71 kb)

References

  1. Ansari MJ, Al-Ghamdi A, Usmani S, Kumar R, Nuru A, Singh K, Dhaliwal HS (2013) Characterization and gene mapping of a brittle culm mutant of diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) with irregular xylem vessels development. Acta Physiol Plant 35:2407–2419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandolini A, Volante A, Heun M (2016) Geographic differentiation of domesticated einkorn wheat and possible Neolithic migration routes. Heredity 117:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faris JD (2014) Wheat domestication: key to agricultural revolutions past and future. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E (eds) Genomics of plant genetic resources, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 439–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaunitz C, Fages A, Hanghøj K, Albrechtsen A, Khan N, Schubert M et al (2018) Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses. Science 360:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill BS, Li W, Sood S, Kuraparthy V, Friebe BR, Simons KJ, Zhang Z, Faris JD (2007) Genetics and genomics of wheat domestication-driven evolution. Israel J Plant Sci 55:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haldorsen S, Akan H, Çelik B, Heun M (2011) The climate of the Younger Dryas as a boundary for einkorn domestication. Veg Hist Archaeobot 20:305–318Google Scholar
  7. Harlan JR, Zohary D (1966) Distribution of wild wheats and barley. Science 153:1074–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heun M, Schaefer-Pregl R, Klawan D, Castagna R, Accerbi M, Borghi B, Salamini F (1997) Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science 278:1312–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heun M, Haldorsen S, Vollan K (2008) Reassessing domestication events in the Near East: einkorn and Triticum urartu. Genome 51:444–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Honne BI, Heun M (2009) On the domestication genetics of self-fertilizing plants. Veg Hist Archaeobot 18:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacomet S (2006) Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites, 2nd edn. Basel University, BaselGoogle Scholar
  12. Marino R, Volante A, Brandolini A, Heun M (2018) A high-resolution Triticum monococcum L. map involving wild, domesticated and feral einkorn genotypes. Plant Breed 137:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng L, Li H, Zhang L, Wang J (2015) QTL IciMapping: integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J 3:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nesbitt M, Samuel D (1996) From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Padulosi S, Hammer K, Heller J (eds) Hulled wheats. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 4. Proceedings of the first international workshop on hulled wheats, 21–22 July 1995, Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, pp 41–100Google Scholar
  15. Pinhasi R, Fort J, Ammerman AJ (2005) Tracing the origin and spread of agriculture in Europe. PLoS Biol 3:e410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pourkheirandish M, Dai F, Sakuma S, Kanamori H, Distelfeld A, Willcox G, Kawahara T, Matsumoto T, Kilian B, Komatsuda T (2018) On the origin of the non-brittle rachis trait of domesticated einkorn wheat. Front Plant Sci 8:2031.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schiemann E (1948) Weizen, Roggen, Gerste Systematik, Geschichte und Verwendung. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  18. Sharma HC, Waines JG (1980) Inheritance of tough rachis in crosses of Triticum monococcum and T. boeoticum. J Hered 7:214–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shindo C, Sasakuma T (2001) Early heading mutants of T. monococcum and Ae. squarrosa, A- and D-genome ancestral species of hexaploid wheat. Breed Sci 51:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stewart RB (1976) Paleoethnobotanical Report—Çayönü 1972. Econ Bot 30:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanno K, Willcox G (2012) Distinguishing wild and domestic wheat and barley spikelets from early Holocene sites in the Near East. Veg Hist Archaeobot 21:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thurber CS, Hepler PK, Caicedo AL (2011) Timing is everything: early degradation of abscission scar is associated with increased seed shattering in US weedy rice. BMC Plant Biol 11:14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Zeist W (1972) Palaeobotanical results of the 1970 season at Çayönü, Turkey. Helinium 12:3–19Google Scholar
  24. Van Zeist W, de Roller GJ (1994) The plant husbandry of Aceramic Çayönü, SE Turkey. Palaeohistoria 33(34):65–96Google Scholar
  25. Wang SC, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2012) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5_011. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREA Research Centre for Animal Production and AquacultureS. Angelo LodigianoItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA)Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)ÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations