Identification of unknown apple (Malus × domestica) cultivars demonstrates the impact of local breeding program on cultivar diversity

  • Briana L. Gross
  • Marshall J. Wedger
  • Marlyn Martinez
  • Gayle M. Volk
  • Cindy Hale
Short Communication
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) trees, either abandoned or cared for, are common on the North American landscape. These trees can live for decades, and therefore represent a record of large- and small-scale agricultural practices through time. Here, we assessed the genetic diversity and identity of 330 unknown apple trees in northern Minnesota with 9 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The unknown (not identified by cultivar name) trees were compared to > 1000 named cultivars in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Plant Genetic Resources Unit Malus collection and also to each other to identify repeated genotypes. Overall, the 330 unknown trees had high diversity (average He = 0.75), and consisted of 264 unique genotypes. A total of 76 of the unknown trees were matched to 20 different named cultivars, and these cultivars were mainly derived from either the local breeding program at the University of Minnesota, or were Russian cultivars imported for horticulture in the northern US. This study demonstrates the importance of local breeding programs, and also the challenges associated with identifying clones in a genetically diverse crop like apple.

Keywords

Clonal identification Malus × domestica Minnesota Perennial crop SSR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Gross, Strasburg, and Olsen Lab members and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on this manuscript, and the UMD and City of Duluth Farmer’s Markets for their support in collecting samples for this project. This work was supported by a Minnesota Department of Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Demonstration Grant (to CH), a UMD Strategic Initiative Grant (to BLG and CH), the UMN Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (to MJW), and the UMN Pathways to Advanced Degrees in Life Sciences Program (fellowship awarded to MM, funded by NIH/NIGMS GM086669 to Benjamin Clarke).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10722_2018_625_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (240 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 240 kb)
10722_2018_625_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (59 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 58 kb)

References

  1. Beach SA (1905) The apples of New York. Vol. I and II. Report of the New York Agicultural Experiment Station for the year 1903. J.B. Lyon Company, Albany, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Burak M, Ergül A, Kazan K, Akcay ME, Yüksel C, Bakir M, Mutaf F, Akpinar AE, Yasasin AS, Ayanoglu H (2014) Genetic analysis of Anatolian apples (Malus sp.) by simple sequence repeats. J Syst Evol 52:580–588.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cornille A, Gladieux P, Smulders MJM, Roldán-Ruiz I, Laurens F, Le Cam B, Nersesyan A, Clavel J, Olonova M, Feugey L, Gabrielyan I, Zhang X-G, Tenaillon MI, Giraud T (2012) New insight into the history of domesticated apple: secondary contribution of the European wild apple to the genome of cultivated varieties. PLoS Genet 8:e1002703.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002703 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornille A, Giraud T, Smulders MJ, Roldan-Ruiz I, Gladieux P (2014) The domestication and evolutionary ecology of apples. Trends Genet 30:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.10.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dolan SA (2009) Fruitful legacy: a historic contex of orchards in the United States, with technical information for registering orchards in the National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreira V, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Carnide V, Pinto-Carnide O, Assunção A, Marreiros A, Rodrigues R, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Castro I (2016) Genetic pool structure of local apple cultivars from Portugal assessed by microsatellites. Tree Genet Genomes 12:36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-0997-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibb C (1884) On the Russian apples imported by U.S. Department of Agriculture in 1870. Gazette Printing Company, Montreal, QC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. Gross BL, Volk GM, Richards CM, Forsline PL, Fazio G, Chao CT (2012) Identification of “duplicate” accessions within the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm system Malus collection. J Am Soc Hort Sci 137:333–342Google Scholar
  9. Gross BL, Volk GM, Richards CM, Reeves PA, Henk AD, Forsline PL, Szewc-McFadden A, Fazio G, Chao CT (2013) Diversity captured in the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System apple core collection. J Am Soc Hort Sci 138:375–381Google Scholar
  10. Gross BL, Henk AD, Richards CM, Fazio G, Volk GM (2014) Genetic diversity in Malus × domestica (Rosaceae) through time in response to domestication. Am J Bot 101:1770–1779.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400297 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedrick UP (1950) A history of horticulture in America to 1860. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Hokanson SC, McFerson JR, Forsline PL, Lamboy WF, Luby JJ, Djangaliev AD, Aldwinckle HS (1997) Collecting and managing wild Malus germplasm in its center of diversity. HortScience 32:173–176Google Scholar
  13. Hokanson SC, Szewc-McFadden AK, Lamboy WF, McFerson JR (1998) Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationships in a Malus × domestica Borkh. core subset collection. Theor Appl Genet 97:671–683.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jombart T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lassois L, Denancé C, Ravon E, Guyader A, Guisnel R, Hibrand-Saint-Oyant L, Poncet C, Lasserre-Zuber P, Feugey L, Durel C-E (2016) Genetic diversity, population structure, parentage analysis, and construction of core collections in the French apple germplasm based on SSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Report 34:827–844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-015-0966-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van De Weg E, Gessler C (2002) Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Mol Breed 10:217–241.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020525906332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4:792–794.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00770.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merwin I (2008) Some antique apples for modern orchards. N Y Fruit Q 16:11–17Google Scholar
  20. Morgan J, Richards A (1993) The book of apples. Ebury Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ragan WH (1905) Nomenclature of the apple: a catalogue of the known varieties referred to in American publications from 1804 to 1904. USDA-BPI Bulletin #56, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Routson KJ, Reilley AA, Henk AD, Volk GM (2009) Identification of historic apple trees in the Southwestern United States and implications for conservation. HortScience 44:589–594Google Scholar
  24. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  25. Thompson MJ (1938) The first twenty-five years of the northeast experiment station, Duluth. University of Minnesota, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  26. Urrestarazu J, Denancé C, Ravon E, Guyader A, Guisnel R, Feugey L, Poncet C, Lateur M, Houben P, Ordidge M, Fernandez-Fernandez F, Evans KM, Paprstein F, Sedlak J, Nybom H, Garkava-Gustavsson L, Miranda C, Gassmann J, Kellerhals M, Suprun I, Pikunova AV, Krasova NG, Torutaeva E, Dondini L, Tartarini S, Laurens F, Durel C-E (2016) Analysis of the genetic diversity and structure across a wide range of germplasm reveals prominent gene flow in apple at the European level. BMC Plant Biol 16:130.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0818-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Volk GM, Henk AD (2016) Historic American apple cultivars: identification and availability. J Am Soc Hort Sci 141:292–301Google Scholar
  28. Volk GM, Chao CT, Norelli J, Brown SK, Fazio G, Peace C, McFerson J, Zhong G-Y, Bretting P (2015) The vulnerability of US apple (Malus) genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:765–794.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0194-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Way RD, Aldwinckle HS, Lamb RC, Rejman A, Sansavini S, Shen T, Watkins R, Westwood MN, Yoshida Y (1991) Apples (Malus). Acta Hort 290:3–46.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.290.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of Minnesota DuluthDuluthUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS National Lab for Genetic Resources PreservationFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Clover Valley FarmsDuluthUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations