Comparison among recognized and non-recognized Phaseolus vulgaris L. landraces as traditional agro-food products of the Campania region (Italy)
- 195 Downloads
Efforts to safeguard and promote the on-farm maintenance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces should take seed quality into high consideration. Seed quality, in addition to suitable agronomic performances, is a good criterion to identify the most interesting materials among those traditionally cultivated. Ten landraces, still cultivated in the Campania region (southern Italy), were investigated. Five of these landraces, recognized as regional traditional agro-food products, are included in the list of the Italian typical products. Landraces belonging to both Mesoamerican and Andean common bean gene pools were present in the ten studied materials. The harvests of two subsequent growing seasons were analysed in order to compare the physico-chemical, culinary and nutritional seed quality of, recognised or not, landraces. Eighteen agronomic and nutritional traits were scored. When individually considered, none of the scored traits was able to discriminate the two groups of landraces. Conversely, submitting all traits to cluster analysis, two sub-clusters corresponding to recognised or not traditional products were obtained. Two landraces, one for each group, remained isolated. On the bases of these results, it can be inferred that the landraces recognized as traditional agro-food products have different culinary and nutritional characteristics in respect to the non-recognized ones.
KeywordsCommon bean Genetic resources Phaseolus vulgaris Quality marks Safeguard Seed composition
The authors thank G. Campanella for supporting in seed processing before chemical analyses.
- AOAC (1970) Official methods of analysis. Association of official agricultural chemists (11th ed) Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
- Clemente A, MacKenzie DA, Jonson IT, Domoney C (2004) Investigation of legume seed protease inhibitors as potential anticarcinogenic proteins. In: Muzquiz M, Hill GD, Cuadrado C, Pedrosa MM, Burbano C (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on antinutritional factors in legume seeds and oilseeds. EAA Publications, Wageningen, pp 137–141Google Scholar
- Comes O (1910) Del fagiuolo comune: storia, filogenesi, qualità sospettata tossicità e sistemazione delle sue razze ovunque coltivate, vol LXI. Atti Istituto Incoraggiamento di Napoli, Napoli, pp 75–145Google Scholar
- Della Gatta C, Piergiovanni AR, Perrino P (1988) An improved method for the determination of trypsin inhibitor levels in legumes. Lebens-Wiss Technol 21:315–318Google Scholar
- Doria E, Campion B, Sparvoli F, Tava A, Nielson E (2012) Anti-nutrient components and metabolites with health implications in seeds of 10 common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus lunatus L.) landraces cultivated in Italy. J Food Compos Anal 26:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2012.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ElMaki HB, Abdelrahaman M, Idris WH, Hassan AB, Babiker EE, El Tinay AH (2007) Content of antinutritional factors and HCl-extractability of minerals from white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties: influence of soaking and/or cooking. Food Chem 100:362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FAOSTAT (2012) FAO statistical database, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/Q/QC/E. Accessed 7 July 2014
- Fiske CH, Subbarow Y (1925) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 66:375–379Google Scholar
- IBPGR (1982) Descriptors for Phaseolus vulgaris. IBPGR, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Lioi L (1991) Electrophoretic variation and geographical distribution of the seed protein phytohemagglutinin in cultivated Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Genet Breed 45:97–102Google Scholar
- Santalla M, De Ron AM, Voysest O (2001) European bean market classes. In: Amurrio M, Santalla M, De Ron AM (eds) Catalogue of bean genetic resources, PHASELIEU-FAIR5-PL97—3463 and Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC). Pontevedra, Spain, pp 79–94Google Scholar