Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 60, Issue 7, pp 2143–2155 | Cite as

Evolution of tetraploid wheat based on variations in 5′ UTR regions of Ppd-A1: evidence of gene flow between emmer and timopheevi wheat

  • Shotaro Takenaka
  • Taihachi Kawahara
Research Article

Abstract

Previous study showed that tetraploid wheat was divided into two groups (Type AI and Type AII) based on sequences around Ppd-A1 gene (Takenaka and Kawahara in Theor Appl Genet 125(5):999–1014, 2012). That study focused on domesticated emmer wheat and used only 19 wild emmer wheats, so could not be clear the evolutional relationship between Type AI and Type AII. Here, a total of 669 accessions comprising 65 einkorn wheats, 185 wild emmer wheats, 107 hulled emmer wheats, 204 free-threshing (FT) emmer wheats, and 108 timopheevii wheats were studied by PCR assay and DNA sequencing for Type AI/AII. Type AII was an older type than Type AI because all einkorn accessions had Type AII. In wild emmer, Type AI was distributed in the northeast regions of its distribution and Type AII was found to be centered on Israel. A total of 37.4 % of hulled emmer accessions were Type AI, while 92.2 % of FT emmer accessions were Type AI. Differences in the proportion of Type AI/AII in domesticated emmer suggested a strong bottle-neck effect. We also found two MITE-like sequence deletion patterns from a part of Type AII accessions (dic-del and ara-del). Dic-del was found from only Israeli wild emmer accessions and ara-del was found from almost all timopheevii wheat accessions. Only three timopheevii accessions did not have ara-del, and one wild emmer accession and ten hulled emmer accessions had ara-del. These accessions suggested gene flow between emmer and timopheevii wheat.

Keywords

Domestication Evolution Gene flow Ppd-1 Tetraploid wheat 

Supplementary material

10722_2013_9983_MOESM1_ESM.xls (97 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 97 kb)

References

  1. Asakura N, Mori N, Ishido T, Ohtsuka I, Nakamura C (2001) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in an STS region linked to the ncc-tmp1A locus are informative for characterizing the differentiation of chromosome 1A in wheat. Genes & Genetic Systems 76(5):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellwood PS (2005) First farmers: the origins of agricultural societies. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown-Guedira G, Badaeva E, Gill B, Cox T (1996) Chromosome substitutions of Triticum timopheevii in common wheat and some observations on the evolution of polyploid wheat species. Theor Appl Genet 93(8):1291–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J (2007) Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316(5833):1862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dvořák J, di Terlizzi P, Zhang HB, Resta P (1993) The evolution of polyploid wheats: identification of the A genome donor species. Genome 36(1):21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Escaravage N, Questiau S, Pornon A, Doche B, Taberlet P (1998) Clonal diversity in a Rhododendron ferrugineum L. (Ericaceae) population inferred from AFLP markers. Mol Ecol 7(8):975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  9. Hammer K, Filatenko AA, Pistrick K (2011) Taxonomic remarks on Triticum L. and × Triticosecale Wittm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harlan JR (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188(4188):618–621Google Scholar
  11. Hirosawa S, Takumi S, Ishii T, Kawahara T, Nakamura C, Mori N (2004) Chloroplast and nuclear DNA variation in common wheat: insight into the origin and evolution of common wheat. Genes & Genetic Systems 79(5):271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hori T, Tsunewaki K (1967) Study on substitution lines of several emmer wheats having the cytoplasm of Triticum boeoticum. Seiken Ziho 19:55–59Google Scholar
  13. Huang S, Sirikhachornkit A, Su X, Faris J, Gill B, Haselkorn R et al (2002) Genes encoding plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase of the Triticum/Aegilops complex and the evolutionary history of polyploid wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(12):8133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ishii T, Mori N, Ogihara Y (2001) Evaluation of allelic diversity at chloroplast microsatellite loci among common wheat and its ancestral species. Theor Appl Genet 103(6):896–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9(4):286–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilian B, Özkan H, Deusch O, Effgen S, Brandolini A, Kohl J et al (2007) Independent wheat B and G genome origins in outcrossing Aegilops progenitor haplotypes. Mole. Bio. Evol. 24(1):217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mole. Evol. 16(2):111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25(11):1451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lilienfeld F (1951) H. Kihara: genome-analysis in Triticum and Aegilops. Cytologia 16(2):101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo MC, Yang ZL, You FM, Kawahara T, Waines JG, Dvorak J (2007) The structure of wild and domesticated emmer wheat populations, gene flow between them, and the site of emmer domestication. Theor Appl Genet 114(6):947–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maan S (1973) Cytoplasmic and cytogenetic relationships among tetraploid Triticum species. Euphytica 22(2):287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maan S, Lucken KA (1971) Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions involving Aegilops cytoplasms and Triticum genomes. J Hered 62(3):149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mori N, Liu YG, Tsunewaki K (1995) Wheat phylogeny determined by RFLP analysis of nuclear DNA. 2. wild tetraploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet 90(1):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mori N, Moriguchi T, Nakamura C (1997) RFLP analysis of nuclear DNA for study of phylogeny and domestication of tetraploid wheat. Genes & Genetic Systems 72(3):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mori N, Ishii T, Ishido T, Hirosawa S, Watatani H, Kawahara T, et al (2003). Origin of domesticated emmer and common wheat inferred from chloroplast DNA fingerprinting. In: Paper presented at the 10th international wheat genetics symposium, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  26. Mori N, Kondo Y, Ishii T, Kawahara T, Valkoun J, Nakamura C (2009) Genetic diversity and origin of timopheevii wheat inferred by chloroplast DNA fingerprinting. Breed. Sci. 59(5):571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nesbitt M, Samuel D (1996) From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Padulosi S, Hammer K, Heller J (eds) Hulled wheats. Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on hulled wheats. Castelvecchio Pascoli. Italy, pp 41–100Google Scholar
  28. Nesbitt M, Samuel D (1998) Wheat domestication: archaeobotanical evidence. Science 279(5356):1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogihara Y, Tsunewaki K (1982) Molecular basis of the genetic diversity of the cytoplasm in Triticum and Aegilops, 1: diversity of the chloroplast genome and its lineage revealed by the restriction pattern of ct-DNAs. Jpn J Genet 57:371–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Özkan H, Brandolini A, Schäfer-Pregl R, Salamini F (2002) AFLP analysis of a collection of tetraploid wheats indicates the origin of emmer and hard wheat domestication in southeast Turkey. Mole. Bio. Evol. 19(10):1797–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Özkan H, Brandolini A, Pozzi C, Effgen S, Wunder J, Salamini F (2005) A reconsideration of the domestication geography of tetraploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet 110(6):1052–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Özkan H, Willcox G, Graner A, Salamini F, Kilian B (2011) Geographic distribution and domestication of wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides). Genet Resour Crop Evol 58(1):11–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rawal K, Harlan J (1975) Cytogenetic analysis of wild emmer populations from Turkey and Israel. Euphytica 24(2):407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodriguez S, Perera E, Maestra B, Diez M, Naranjo T (2000) Chromosome structure of Triticum timopheevii relative to T. turgidum. Genome 43(6):923–930PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132(3):365–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mole. Bio. Evol. 4(4):406Google Scholar
  37. Salamini F, Özkan H, Brandolini A, Schafer-Pregl R, Martin W (2002) Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat Rev Genet 3(6):429–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Takenaka S, Kawahara T (2012) Evolution and dispersal of emmer wheat (Triticum sp.) from novel haplotypes of Ppd-1 (photoperiod response) genes and their surrounding DNA sequences. Theor Appl Genet 125(5):999–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Bio. Evol. 28(10):2731–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tanaka M, Kawahara T, Sano J (1978) The origin and the evolution of tetraploid wheats. Wheat Inf. Serv. 47–48:7–11Google Scholar
  41. Tanno K, Willcox G (2006) How fast was wild wheat domesticated? Science 311(5769):1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsunewaki K (2009) Plasmon analysis in the TriticumAegilops complex. Breed. Sci. 59(5):455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilhelm EP, Turner AS, Laurie DA (2009) Photoperiod insensitive Ppd-A1a mutations in tetraploid wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Theor Appl Genet 118(2):285–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world: the origin and spread of cultivated plants in west Asia, Europe, and the Nile valley. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Crop Evolution, Plant Germ-plasm Institute, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityMukoJapan

Personalised recommendations