Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 261–276 | Cite as

Characterization of the lentil landrace Santo Stefano di Sessanio from Abruzzo, Italy

  • Renzo Torricelli
  • Donato Domenico Silveri
  • Nicoletta Ferradini
  • Gianfranco Venora
  • Fabio Veronesi
  • Luigi Russi
Research Article


In the world lentil is grown on more than 3 million hectares and is one of the most important, low-cost, food source of protein. In Italy lentil has been cultivated since ancient times, but in the last decades its cultivation has been confined to marginal areas, small islands and hilly, mountainous areas of central and southern Italy. Local varieties are still common and are often greatly appreciated for their taste and cooking qualities. Several accessions from the Santo Stefano di Sessanio area, Abruzzo Region, were collected and phenotypically and genotypically characterized in order to look for the existing variability within and between populations. Image analysis of seeds was also used. Populations grown in Santo Stefano di Sessanio and in the neighbouring area basically share most of their characteristics. However, some of the accessions anonymously gathered from the local market were shown to be different from those collected from farmers. The paper reports and discusses how this local product needs be characterized and promoted in order to avoid fraud that could negatively affect the local economy and put valuable, adapted, genetic resources at risk of erosion.


Cluster, discriminant and principal components analysis Image analysis Lens culinaris Medik. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization 



Project funded by the Agenzia Regionale per i Servizi di Sviluppo Agricolo d’Abruzzo (ARSSA), Avezzano (AQ). The collaboration of the farmers in providing the seeds is greatly appreciated.


  1. Ahmad M, McNeil DL, Sedcole JR (1997) Phylogenetic relationships in Lens species and their interspecific hybrids as measured by morphological characters. Euphytica 94:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchetta G, Grillo O, Mattana E, Venora G (2008) Morpho-colorimetric characterization by image analysis to identify diaspores of wild plant species. Flora 203:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barulina EI (1930) Lentils of the USSR and of other countries; a botanico-agronomical monograph. Bulletin of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding Supplement (Leningrad) 40:1–319Google Scholar
  4. Cubero JI (1981) Origin, taxonomy and domestication. In: Webb C, Hawtin G (eds) Lentils, commonwealth agricultural bureaux. Farnham, UK, pp 15–38Google Scholar
  5. Cubero JI (1984) Taxonomy, distribution and evolution of the lentil and its wild relatives. In: Witcombe JR, Erskine W (eds) Genetic resources and their exploitation—chickpeas, faba beans and lentils. M. Nijhoff & W. Junk, Boston, pp 187–203Google Scholar
  6. Erskine W, Adham Y, Holly L (1989) Geographic distribution of variation in quantitative traits in a world lentil collection. Euphytica 43:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAOSTAT (2008) Databases Query,
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson ME, Robertson LD (1996) Genetic diversity and taxonomic relationships within the genus Lens as revealed by allozyme polymorphism. Euphytica 91:163–172Google Scholar
  10. Ford R, Taylor PWJ (2003) Construction of an intraspecific linkage map of lentil (Lens culinaris ssp. culinaris). Theor Appl Genet 107:910–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford R, Pang ECK, Taylor PWJ (1997) Diversity analysis and species identification in Lens using PCR generated markers. Euphytica 96:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gower JC (1966) Some distant properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338Google Scholar
  13. Havey MH, Muehlbauer FJ (1989) Linkages between restriction fragment length, isozyme and morphological markers in lentil. Theor Appl Genet 77:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horneburg B, Becker HC (2008) Crop adaptation in on-farm management by natural and conscious selection: a case study with lentil. Crop Sci 48:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherchers sur la distribution floreale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat 44:223–270Google Scholar
  16. Joliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Karp A, Kresovich S, Bhat KV, Ayad WG, Hodgkin T (1997) Molecular tools in plant genetic resources conservation: a guide to the technologies. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 2. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. Liao K, Paulsen MR, Reid JF (1994) Real-time detection of colour and surface defects of maize kernels using machine vision. Journal Agricultural Engineering Research 59:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mantel NA (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Piergiovanni AR (2000) The evolution of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) cultivation in Italy and its effects on the survival of autochthonous populations. Genet Resour Crop Evol 47:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porfiri O, Costanza MT, Negri V (2009) Landrace inventories in Italy and the Lazio Region case study. In: Vetelainen M, Negri V, Maxted N (eds) European landraces: on-farm conservation, management and use. Bioversity Technical Bulletin No.15. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy, pp 117–123Google Scholar
  22. Rohlf FJ (1993) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version. 1.8. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1981) Comparing numerical taxonomy studies. Syst Zool 30:459–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sainis JK, Shouice SP, Bhagwast SG (2006) Image analysis of wheat grains developed in different environments and its implications for identification. Journal of Agricultural Science 144:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SAS (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  26. Schatzki TF, Haff RP, Young R, Can I, Lee LC, Toyufuku N (1997) Defect detection in apples by means of X-ray imaging. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 40:1407–1415Google Scholar
  27. Shahin MA, Symons SJ (2003a) Lentil type identification using machine vision. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 45:3.5–3.11Google Scholar
  28. Shahin MA, Symons SJ (2003b) Colour calibration of scanners for scanner-independent grain grading. Cereal Chem 80:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharma SK, Dawson IK, Waugh R (1995) Relationships among cultivated and wild lentils revealed by RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 91:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma SK, Knox MR, Ellis THN (1996) AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 93:751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Sonnante G, Pignone D (2007) The major Italian landraces of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.): their molecular diversity and possible origin. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1023–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sonnante G, Hammer K, Pignone D (2009) From the cradle of agriculture a handful of lentils: history of domestication. Rendiconti Lincei 20:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SPSS (2006) SPSS for windows. Version 15.0. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. UPOV (2003) International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants of December 2, 1961, as revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, on October 23, 1978, and on March 19, 1991. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Venora G, Grillo O, Shahin MA, Symons SJ (2007) Identification of Sicilian landraces and Canadian cultivars of lentil using an image analysis system. Food Res Int 40:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot L, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yap IV, Nelson JR (1996) WinBoot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI International Rice Research Institute, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang M, De Baerdemaeker J, Schrevens E (2003) Effects of different varieties and shelf storage conditions of chicory on deteriorative colour changes using digital image processing and analysis. Food Res Int 36:669–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zohary D (1972) The wild progenitor and place of origin of the cultivated lentil. Lens culinaris. Econ Bot 26:326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zohary D (1995) Lentil: Lens culinaris (Leguminoseae—Papilionoideae). In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants. Longman Scientific & Technical. Harlow, UK, pp 271–274Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renzo Torricelli
    • 1
  • Donato Domenico Silveri
    • 2
  • Nicoletta Ferradini
    • 1
  • Gianfranco Venora
    • 3
  • Fabio Veronesi
    • 1
  • Luigi Russi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia ApplicataUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugia (PG)Italy
  2. 2.Agenzia Regionale per i Servizi di Sviluppo Agricolo d’Abruzzo (ARSSA)Avezzano (AQ)Italy
  3. 3.Stazione Sperimentale di Granicoltura per la SiciliaImage Analysis LaboratoryCaltagirone (CT)Italy

Personalised recommendations