Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 58, Issue 7, pp 1041–1050 | Cite as

Cytological status of Allium hookeri Thwaites (2n = 22)

  • Geeta Sharma
  • R. N. Gohil
  • Veenu Kaul
Research Article

Abstract

Determining the base number, ploidy level and type of ploidy are important aspects in the cytogenetic study of a species. To assess the nature of Allium hookeri Thwaites (2n=22), chromosomes of its two populations from North-eastern Himalayas were worked out for morphological details, putative grouping and pairing properties during reduction division. Karyotype was found to split into 7 pairs and 8 single chromosomes; 7 pairs revealed minor differences in overall chromosome morphology. Critical analysis of chromosome behaviour during reduction division at diakinesis and metaphase I revealed the presence of trivalents in 60.5 and 58.5% pollen mother cells respectively. High frequency of cells with trivalents pointed towards considerable homology in three genomes. Though remaining cells had multivalents higher than trivalents, similarity in three genomes was there. High frequency of cells with trivalents and the fact that 22 chromosomes can be arranged in seven twos and eight ones indicated that these represent numerical variants of segmental allotriploids. Besides, occurrence of 29.8 and 17.6% chromosomes as multivalents higher than trivalents at diakinesis and metaphase I supported that multiple interchanges accompanied the polyploidy in the evolution of present cytotypes. Pairing anomalies noticed during meiosis result in very low pollen stainability (0.05%) leading to sterility. Propagation by bulbs ensures the survival and maintenance of such a complex heterozygosity in the species.

Keywords

Allium hookeri Thwaites Chromosome morphology Karyotype analysis Multivalents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Head, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu for providing the necessary facilities and National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (Bhowali) for providing the plant material. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India, New Delhi is also gratefully acknowledged for providing financial assistance to the first author.

References

  1. Bennett ST, Kenton AY, Bennett MD (1992) Genomic in situ hybridisation differentiates between A/D- and C- genome chromatin and detects intergenomic translocations in polyploid oat species (genus Avena). Genome 37:613–618Google Scholar
  2. Cleland R (1972) Oenothera: cytogenetics and evolution. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaut BS, Doebley JF (1997) DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:6808–6814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hooker JD (1892) The flora of British India, vol VI. L. Reeve and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. James SH (1965) Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. I. The occurrence of interchange heterozygosity, autogamy and balanced lethal system. Heredity 20:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jamilena M, Rejon CR, Rejon MR (1990) Variation in the heterochromatin and nucleolar organizing regions of Allium subvillosum L. (Liliaceae). Genome 33:779–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jellen EN, Gill BS, Cox TS (1994) Genomic in situ hybridization revealed allopolyploid nature of Milium montianum (Gramineae). Chromosoma 101:420–424Google Scholar
  8. Jha TB, Jha S (1989) In vitro regeneration and cytological study of Allium hookeri Thw. Indian J Exp Biol 27:363–365Google Scholar
  9. Kala CP (2005) Ethnomedicinal botany of the Apatani in the Eastern Himalayan region of India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 1:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koul AK, Gohil RN (1971) Further studies on natural triploidy in viviparous onion. Cytologia 36(2):253–261Google Scholar
  11. Koul AK, Sharma MC, Gohil RN (1969) Cytology of the tetraploid Allium rubellum Bieb. Caryologia 24(2):149–155Google Scholar
  12. Levy AA, Feldman M (2002) The impact of polyploidy on grass genome evolution. Plant Physiol 130:1587–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meimberg H, Rice KJ, Milan NF, Nijoku CC, Mackay JK (2009) Multiple origins promote ecological amplitude of allopolyploid Aegilops (Poaceae). Am J Bot 96(7):1262–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pandey A, Pandey R, Negi KS, Radhamani J (2008) Realizing value of genetic resources of Allium in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:985–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rui-Fu H, Rong-Cheng WEI, Jie-Mei X (1996) A study of karyotypes on Allium hookeri and its variety Allium hookeri var. muliense. Acta Bot Yunnan 8:78–84Google Scholar
  16. Samoylov A, Friesen N, Pollner S, Hanelt P (2008) Use of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms for the phylogenetic study of Allium subgenus Amerallium and subgenus Bromatorrhiza (Alliaceae) II. Feddes Repert 110:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sen S (1974) Cryptic structural changes in the evolution of cultivated Alliums. Indian J Hered 8:41–50Google Scholar
  18. Sharma G, Gohil RN (2008) Intrapopulation karyotypic variability in Allium roylei Stearn – a threatened species. Bot J Linn Soc 158:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh F, Ved Brat S, Khoshoo TN (1969) Natural triploidy in viviparous onions. Cytologia 32:403–407Google Scholar
  20. Singh HB, Singh RS, Sandhu JS (2003) Herbal medicine of Manipur–A colour encyclopaedia. Daya Publishing House, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Song K, Lu P, Tang K, Osborn TC (1995) Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:7719–7723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Truco MJ, Hu J, Sadowski J, Quiros CF (1996) Inter- and intragenomic homology of the Brassica genomes: implications for their origin and evolution. Theor Appl Genet 93:1225–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tzanoudakis D, Vosa CG (1988) The cytogeographical distribution pattern of Allium (Alliaceae) in the Greek Peninsula and Islands. Plant Syst Evol 159:193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wendel JF (2000) Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol 42:225–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yi-Xiang Y, Rui-Fu H, Rong-Cheng W, Jie-Mei X (1990) Studies on the karyotypes of 5 samples of Allium sect. Bromatorrhiza Ekberg. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 28:177–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of JammuJammuIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Biodiversity Studies, School of Biosciences and BiotechnologyBGSB UniversityRajouriIndia

Personalised recommendations