Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 511–522 | Cite as

Univariate and multivariate analysis performed on bio-agronomical traits of Cucumis melo L. germplasm

  • C. Lotti
  • A. R. Marcotrigiano
  • C. De Giovanni
  • P. Resta
  • A. Ricciardi
  • V. Zonno
  • G. Fanizza
  • L. Ricciardi
Research Article

Abstract

A large collection of melon (Cucumis melo L.) germplasm has been established at the Section of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bari University (Italy). In the present work, data regarding the variation of 20 bio-agronomical traits recorded on entries and landraces collected in Albania and Apulia region (Southern Italy) are reported. The main objective of the study was to assess and describe, by means of univariate and multivariate analyses, the genetic diversity in the collection composed by genotypes classified in the Inodorus and Cantalupensis groups. The results obtained showed a large variation for all the traits examined. Furthermore, it was possible to identify valuable genotypes for future breeding programmes aimed at improving melon traits, particularly for the Inodorus group, which is an important crop in many Southern Italian sites. Genotypes of interest were especially selected for earliness and lateness, fruit shape, soluble solids content, storage time and fruit firmness.

Keywords

Cluster analysis Cucumis melo Germplasm variation Melon Principal component analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported jointly by the special projects “Risorse genetiche per il miglioramento di specie di interesse e per un agricoltura sostenibile” granted by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural Policy (MiPAF) and “Interreg III A—SIAB Project—Nuovo Programma di Prossimità Adriatico” granted by the European Union.

References

  1. Assefa K, Merker A, Tefera H (2003) Multivariate analysis of diversity of tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) germplasm from western and southern Ethiopia. Hereditas 138:228–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianco VV (1990) Melone (Cucumis melo L.). In: Pàtron (ed) Orticoltura. Bologna, pp 564–609Google Scholar
  3. Brown AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approaches to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824Google Scholar
  4. Fabeiro C, Martín de Santa Olalla F, de Juan JA (2002) Production of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) under controlled deficit irrigation in a semi-arid climate. Agric Water Manage 54:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrari V (1998) Fusarium e nematodi galligeni due avversità del melone di difficile controllo chimico. L’Inf Agrario 3(Suppl):48–50Google Scholar
  6. Flores F, Gutierrez JC, Lopez J, Moreno MT, Cubero JI (1997) Multivariate analysis approach to evaluate a germplasm collection of Hedysarum coronarium L. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:545–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankel OH (1972) The significance, utilisation and conservation of crop genetic resources. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Frankel OH (1984) Genetic perspective of germplasm conservations. In: Arber W, Llimensee K, Peacock WJ, Starlinger P (eds) Genetic manipulations: impact on man and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  9. Garcia E, Jamilena M, Alvarez JI, Arnedo T, Oliver JL, Lozano R (1998) Genetic relationships among melon breeding lines revealed by DNA markers and agronomic traits. Theor Appl Genet 96:878–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia-Mas J, Oliver M, Gomez-Paniagua H, De Vincente MC (2000) Comparing AFLP, RAPD and RFLP markers for measuring genetic diversity in melon. Theor Appl Genet 101:860–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gladis T, Hammer K, Perrino P, Podyma W, Xhuvely L (1995) Report of the third collecting mission in Albania, autumn, 1994. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 140:21–23Google Scholar
  12. Grebenščikov I (1986) Cucurbitaceae. In: Schultze-Motel J (eds) Rudolf Mansfelds Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlicher und gärtnerischer Kulturpflanzen. Akademie, Berlin, pp 914–951Google Scholar
  13. Hair J Jr, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1995) Multivariate data analysis: with readings, 4th edn. A. Simon and Schuster Company, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammer K, Hanelt P, Perrino P (1986) Carosello and the taxonomy of Cucumis melo L. especially of its vegetable races. Kulturpflanze 34:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer K, Laghetti G, Pignone D, Pistrick K, Xhuvely L, Perrino P (1994) Emergency collection missions to Albania. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 97:59–62Google Scholar
  16. Harlan JR (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188:618–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartz TK (1997) Effects of drip irrigation scheduling on muskmelon yield and quality. Sci Hortic 69:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iezzoni AF, Pritts MP (1991) Applications of principal component analysis to horticulture research. Hortic Sci 26:334–338Google Scholar
  19. Jeffrey C (1990) Systematics of the Cucurbitaceae: An overview. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds) Biology and utilization of the cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  20. Jeffrey C (2001) Cucurbitaceae. In: Hanelt, Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (eds) Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 1510–1557Google Scholar
  21. Kirkbride JH (1993) Biosystematic Monograph of the Genus Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae). Parkway Publishers, Boone, NC, p 159Google Scholar
  22. Kumar LS (1999) DNA markers in plant improvement: an overview. Biotechnol Adv 17:143–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linnaeus C (1753) Species plantarum, 1st edn. Impensis Laurentii Salvii, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall DR (1990) Crop genetic resources: current and emerging issues. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MH, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinaver, Sunderland, MA, USA, pp 367–388Google Scholar
  26. McCreight JD, Nerson H, Grumet R (1993) Melon, Cucumis melo L. In: Kalloo G, Bergh BO (eds) Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp 267–294Google Scholar
  27. Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1985) An examination of procedures for determining the number of cluster in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Munger HM, Robinson RW (1991) Nomenclature of Cucumis melo L. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 14:43–44Google Scholar
  29. Nayar NM, Singh R (1998) Taxonomy, distribution and ethnobotanical uses. In: Nayar NM, More TA (eds) Cucurbits. Science Publishers, USA, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  30. Polignano GB, Uggenti P, Olita G, Bisignano V, Alba V, Perrino P (2005) Characterization of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) entries by means of agronomically useful traits. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 4:10–14Google Scholar
  31. Ricciardi L, Filippetti A (2000) L’erosione genetica di specie agrarie in ambito mediterraneo: rilevanza del problema e strategie di intervento. Options Méditerr 53:191–225Google Scholar
  32. Ricciardi L, Filippetti A (2001) Preliminary characterization of germplasm collected in Apulia and Albania. Options Méditerr 47:151–169Google Scholar
  33. Ricciardi L, Bruno A, Lotti C, De Giovanni C, Filippetti A (2001) Molecular characterisation of Cucumis melo L. germplasm collected in Apulia and Albania. In: Ricciardi L, Myrta A, De Castro F (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd seminar Italo-Albanian cooperation for the enhancement of plant biodiversity. Mediterranean Agronomic Institute, Bari, 22–24 March 2001, pp 87–95Google Scholar
  34. Ricciardi L, Lotti C, De Giovanni C, Marcotrigiano AR, Roselli M (2002) Relazioni genetiche tra ecotipi di Cucumis melo L. mediante l’analisi di variazione di caratteri bio-agronomici e marcatori RAPD. In: Proceedings of the atti III workshop-gruppo lavoro SOI, Valenzano (Bari), Italy, 25–26 June, pp 433–440Google Scholar
  35. Ricciardi L, De Giovanni C, Dell’Orco P, Lotti C, Marcotrigiano AR (2003) Phenotypic and genetic characterization of Cucumis melo L. landraces collected in Apulia (Italy) and Albania. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 623:95–105Google Scholar
  36. Robinson RW, Deckers-Walters DS (1997) Cucurbits. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, ISBN:0 85199 133 5Google Scholar
  37. SAS Institute (1992) SAS/STAT User’S Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, Release 6.03 EditionGoogle Scholar
  38. Seber GAF (1984) Principal components. In: Wiley J & Sons (eds) Multivariate observations. Wiley, New York, pp 176–212Google Scholar
  39. Silberstein L, Kovalsky I, Huang R, Anagnostou K, Kyle Jahn MM, Perl-Treves R (1999) Molecular variation in melon (Cucumis melo L.) as revealed by RFLP and RAPD markers. Sci Hortic 79:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principle and practice of numerical classification. WH Freman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Staub JE, Danin-Poleg Y, Fazio G, Horejsi T, Reis N, Katzir N (2000) Comparative analysis of cultivated melon groups (Cucumis melo L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA and simple sequence repeat markers. Euphytica 115:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stepansky A, Kovalsky I, Perl-Traves R (1999) Intraspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation. Plant Syst Evol 217:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Villanueva MJ, Tenorio MD, Esteban MA, Mendoza MC (2004) Compositional changes during ripening of two cultivars of muskmelon fruits. Food Chem 87:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Virchow D (1999) Definitions of Genetic Resources. In: Springer (ed) Conservation of genetic resources – costs and implications for a sustainable utilization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Springer, Berlin, pp 4–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lotti
    • 1
  • A. R. Marcotrigiano
    • 2
  • C. De Giovanni
    • 2
  • P. Resta
    • 2
  • A. Ricciardi
    • 1
  • V. Zonno
    • 2
  • G. Fanizza
    • 2
  • L. Ricciardi
    • 2
  1. 1.Facoltà di Agraria, Dipartimento di Scienze Agro-Ambientali, Chimica e Difesa VegetaleUniversità di FoggiaFoggiaItaly
  2. 2.Facoltà di Agraria, Dipartimento di Biologia e Chimica Agro-Forestale ed Ambientale, Sezione di Genetica e Miglioramento GeneticoUniversità degli Studi di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations