Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 1235–1244 | Cite as

RAPD and ISSR fingerprinting in cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild progenitor Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky

  • L. S. Rao
  • P. Usha Rani
  • P. S. Deshmukh
  • P. A. Kumar
  • S. K. Panguluri
Original Paper


Detection of genetic relationships between 19 chickpea cultivars and five accessions of its wild progenitor Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky were investigated by using RAPD and ISSR markers. On an average, six bands per primer were observed in RAPD analysis and 11 bands per primer in ISSR analysis. In RAPD, the wild accessions shared 77.8% polymorphic bands with chickpea cultivars, whereas they shared 79.6% polymorphic bands in ISSR analysis. In RAPD analysis 51.7% and 50.5% polymorphic bands were observed among wild accessions and chickpea cultivars, respectively. Similarly, 65.63% and 56.25% polymorphic bands were found in ISSR analysis. The dendrogram developed by pooling the data of RAPD and ISSR analysis revealed that the wild accessions and the ICCV lines showed similar pattern with the dendrogram of RAPD analysis. The ISSR analysis clearly indicated that even with six polymorphic primers, reliable estimation of genetic diversity could be obtained, while nearly 30 primers are required for RAPD. Moreover, RAPD can cause genotyping errors due to competition in the amplification of all RAPD fragments. The markers generated by ISSR and RAPD assays can provide practical information for the management of genetic resources. For the selection of good parental material in breeding programs the genetic data produced through ISSR can be used to correlate with the relationship measures based on pedigree data and morphological traits to minimize the individual inaccuracies in chickpea.


Chickpea Genetic diversity ISSR’s RAPD’s Cicer arietinum 



Inter Simple Sequence Repeats


Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA



Authors are grateful to Dr. S S Yadav, Principal Scientist and Dr. Jitender Kumar, Senior Scientist, Pulse Research Laboratory, IARI, New Delhi for providing seed material.


  1. Abbo S, Berger J, Turner NC (2003) Evaluation of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Func Plant Biol 30:1081–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad F, Slinkard AE (1992) Genetic relationships in the genus Cicer L. as revealed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of seed storage proteins. Theor Appl Genet 84:688–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornet B, Branchard M (2001) Non anchored inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers reproducible and specific tools for genome finger printing. Plant Mol Biol Rep 19:209–215Google Scholar
  4. Collard BCY, Pang ECK, Taylor PWJ (2003a) Selection of wild Cicer accessions for the generation of mapping populations segregating for resistance to ascochyta blight. Euphytica 130:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collard BCY, Pang ECK, Ades PK, Taylor PWJ (2003b) Preliminary investigation of QTLs associated with seedling resistance to ascochyta blight from Cicer echinospermum, a wild relative of chickpea. Ther Appl Genet 107:719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croser JS, Ahmad F, Clarke HJ, Siddique KHM (2003) Utilization of wild Cicer in chickpea improvement-progress, constraints, and prospects. Aust J Agri Res 54:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  8. Duran Y, Fratini R, Garcia P, Perez de la Vega M (2004) An intersubspecific genetic map of Lens. Theor Appl Genet 108:1265-1270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO (2004) http://faostat.fao.orgGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernandez ME, Fygueiras AM, Benito C (2002) The use of ISSR and RADP markers for detecting DNA polymorphism genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theor Appl Genet 104:845-851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gowda CLL (1981) Natural outcrossing in chickpea. Int Chickpea Newsl 5:6Google Scholar
  12. Iruela M, Rubio J, Cubero JI, Gil J, Milan T (2002) Phylogenetic analysis in the genus Cicer and cultivated chickpea using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 104:643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Labdi M, Robertson LD, Singh KB, Charrier A (1996) Genetic diversity and phylogentic relationships among the annual Cicer species as revealed by isozyme polymorphism. Euphytica 88:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladizinsky G, Adler A (1976) Genetic relationships among the annual species of Cicer L. Theor Appl Genet 48:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malhotra RS, Pundir RPS, Slinkard AE (1987) Genetic resources of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds) The chickpea. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 67–81Google Scholar
  16. Moussa EH, Millan T, Gil J, Cubero JI (1996) Variability and genome length estimation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) revealed by RAPD analysis. J Genet Breed 51:83–85Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen TT, Taylor PWJ, Redden RJ, Ford R (2004) Genetic diversity estimates in Cicer using AFLP analysis. Plant Breed 123:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Panguluri SK, Janaiah K, Govil JN, Kumar PA, Sharma PC (2006) AFLP fingerprinting in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) and its wild relatives. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qian W, Ge S and Hang DY (2001) Genetic variation with in and among populations of a wild rice Oryza granulata from china detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 102:440–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rajesh PN, Tullu A, Gil J, Gupta VS, Ranjekar PK, Muehlbaur FJ (2002) Identification of an STMS marker for the double-podding gene in chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 105:604–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rajesh PN, Sant VJ, Gupta VS, Muehlbaur FJ and Ranjekar PK (2003) Genetic relationships among annual and perennial wil species of Cicer using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism. Euphytica 129:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ratnaparkhe MB, Santra DK, Tullu A, Muehlbauer FJ (1998) Inheritance of inter simple sequence repeat polymorphism and linkage with fusarium wilt resistance gene in chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 96:348–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reddy MP, Sarla N, Siddiq EA (2002) Inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 128:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson LD, Ocampo B, Singh KB (1997) Morphological variation in wild annual Cicer species in comparision to the cultigen. Euphytica 95:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sales E, Nebauer SG, Mus M, Segura J (2001) Population genetic study in the Balearic endemic plant species Digitalis minor (Scrophuiariaceae) using RAPD markers. Am J Bot 88:1750–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sant VJ, Patankar AG, Sarode ND, Mhase LB, Sainani MN, Deshmukh RB, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (1999) Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analyzing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Santra DK, Tekeoglu M, Ratnaparkhe MB, Kaiser WJ, Muehlbauer FJ (2000) Identification and mapping of QTLs conferring resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea. Crop Sci 40:1606–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shan F, Clarke HC, Plummer JA, Yan G, Siddique KHM (2005) Geographical patterns of genetic variation in the world collections of wild annual Cicer characterized by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet 110:381–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simon CJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1997) Construction of chickpea linkage map and its comparison with the maps of pea and lentil. J Heridity 88:115–119Google Scholar
  30. Singh KB, Ocampo B (1997) Exploration of wild Cicer species for yield improvement in chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 95:418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh KB, Malhotra RS, Halila MH, Knights EJ, Verma MM (1994) Current status and future strategy in breeding chickpea for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sudupak MA, Akkaya MS, Kence A (2002) Analysis of genetic relationships among perennial and annual Cicer species growing in Turkey using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:1220–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sudupak MA (2004) Inter- and intra-species inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) variation in the genus Cicer. Euphytica 135:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sudupak MA, Akkaya MS, Kence A (2004) Genetic relationships among perennial and annual Cicer species growing in Turkey assessed by AFLP fingerprinting. Theor Appl Genet 108:937–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tayyer RI, Waines JG (1996) Genetic relationships among annual species of Cicer (Fabaceae) using isozyme variation. Theor Appl Genet 92:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Virk PS, Newbury HJ, Jacckson MT, Ford-Lioyd BV (1995) The identification of duplicate accessions within a rice germplasm collection using RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 90:1049–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitraray primers are useful as genetic markers. Nuceic Acids Res 18:6531–6535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winter P, Benko-Iseppon AM, Huttel B, Ratnaparkhe MB, Tullu A, Sonnante G, Pfaff T, Tekeoglu M, Santra D, Sant VJ, Rajesh PN, Kahl G, Muehlbauer FJ (2000) A linkage map of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome based on recombinant inbred lines from a C. arietinum  ×  C. reticulatum cross: localization of resistance genes for fusarium races 4 and 5. Theor Appl Genet 101:1155–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu J, Krutovski KV, Strauss SH (2000) Nuclear DNA diversity, population differentiation and phylogetic relationships in the California closed-cone pines based on RAPD and allozyme markers. Genome 42:893–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Rao
    • 1
  • P. Usha Rani
    • 2
  • P. S. Deshmukh
    • 1
  • P. A. Kumar
    • 2
  • S. K. Panguluri
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Plant PhysiologyIARINew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.NRC on Plant BiotechnologyIARINew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Entomology, College of AgricultureUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations