Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 53, Issue 8, pp 1635–1641 | Cite as

Identification of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) and analysis of their genetic relationships by chloroplast sequence-characterised amplified regions (cpSCAR)



Ten cpSCAR markers that show polymorphism in Prunus avium were used to fingerprint sweet cherry cultivars. The purpose of the study was also to contribute to identification and to help determine their genetic interrelationships. Samples of ‘0900 Ziraat’, a superior Turkish variety, which were collected in several locations all over Turkey, had identical cpSCAR patterns, and they resembled a common European haplotype, A. ‘Sweetheart’, ‘Summit’ and ‘Canada Giant’ and their haplotype are intermediate between the previously described haplotypes A and B, which were originally found in Central and Eastern European sweet and wild cherries, and those from Northern Turkey, respectively. The data therefore suggests a local maternal descent (within Europe and Asia Minor) of the cultivars analysed. Our results show that chloroplast DNA analysis is a straightforward way to classify cherry cultivars. We compare our results to others previously reported for sweet cherry cultivars, and conclude that cpSCAR diversity data could be considered for phylogenetic studies in this group.


cpDNA primers Genetic diversity Haplotype PCR–RFLP Polymorphism Prunus avium 



amplified fragment length polymorphism


chloroplast DNA


chloroplast DNA sequence characterised region


chloroplast haplotype A


chloroplast haplotype B


polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism


random amplified polymorphic DNA


simple sequence repeat


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beaver J.K., Iezzoni A.F. and Ramm C.W. (1995). Isozyme diversity in soursweet and ground cherry. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 847–852 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brettin T.S., Karle R., Crowe E.L. and Iezzoni A.F. (2000). Chloroplast inheritance and DNA variation in sweetsourand ground cherry. J. Heredity 91: 75–79 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cipriani G., Lot G., Huang W.G., Marrazzo M.T., Peterlunger E. and Testolin R. (1999). AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 65–72 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demesure B., Sodzi N. and Petit R.J. (1995). Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Europe. Evolution 50: 2515–2520 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doyle J.J., Davis J.I., Soreng R.J., Garvin D. and Anderson M.J. (1992). Chloroplast DNA inversions and the origin of the grass family (Poaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 89: 7722–7726 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumolin-Lapegue S., Pemonge M.-H. and Petit R.J. (1997). An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 6: 393–398 .PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerlach H.K. and Stösser R. (1997). Patterns of random amplified polymorphic DNAs for sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivar identification. Angew. Bot. 71: 212–218 .Google Scholar
  8. Heinze B. (1994). RAPD reactions from crude plant DNA – adding RNase A as a ‘helper enzyme’. Mol. Biotechnol. 1: 307–310 .PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinze B. 1999. Molecular genetic investigations in wild and cultivated Prunus avium in Austria and beyond. In: Espinel S. and Ritter E. (eds) Proceedings of Applications of Biotechnology To Forest Genetics. International Congress Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain22–25 September 1999, pp. 77–80..Google Scholar
  10. Heinze B. (2001). Müller-Starck, G. and Schubert, R. (eds) Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions. Forest Science, pp 117–127. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht .Google Scholar
  11. Iezzoni A.F. and Brettin T.S. (1998). Utilization of molecular genetics in cherry. Acta Hortc. 468: 53–62 .Google Scholar
  12. Mohanty A., Martin J.P. and Aguinagalde I. (2001). Chloroplast DNA study in wild populations and some cultivars of Prunus avium L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 112–117 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Palmer J.D. (1987). Chloroplast DNA evolution and biosystematic uses of chloroplast DNA variation. Am. Nat. 130: 6–29 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Panda S., Martín J.P. and Aguinagalde I. (2003a). Chloroplast DNA study in sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) using PCR–RFLP method. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50: 489–495 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panda S., Martín J.P., Aguinagalde I. and Mohanty A. (2003b). Chloroplast DNA variation in cultivated and wild Prunus avium L.: a comparative study. Plant Breeding 122: 92–94 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Struss D., Boritzki M., Glozer K. and Southwick S.M. (2001). Detection of genetic diversity among populations of sweet cherry. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 76: 362–367 .Google Scholar
  17. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G. and Bouvet J. (1991). Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 1105–1109 .PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tavaud M. 2002. Etude de la domestication du Cerisier doux: analyse de la diversité génétique des compartiments sauvages et cultivés de l’espece Prunus avium. Dissertation, University of Montpellier, Montpellier..Google Scholar
  19. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M., Zabeau M. and Lee T. (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Res. 23: 4407–4414 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Weising K. and Gardner R. (1999). A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42: 9–19 .PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zohary D. and Hopf M. (2000). Domestication of Plants in the Old World. Oxford University Press, New York, 182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mustafa Kemalpasa Vocational SchoolUludag UniversityBursaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Biology and GeneticsBogazici UniversityBebekTurkey
  3. 3.Federal Research Centre for ForestryViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations