Methods of monitoring the stress-strain state of strong elements for special glazing used in aircraft as well as for inclusion in transparent body armor are presented. Data obtained from monitoring of witness samples of chemically tempered glass by means of a scattered-light polariscope and a destructive, centrosymmetric, bending method are presented. On the basis of these data conclusions are drawn on whether or not nondestructive methods of monitoring can be used as indicators of the stress-strain state of a glass surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. N. Stepnov and A. V. Shavrin, Handbook of Statistical Methods of Processing the Results of Mechanical Tests [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2005).
Kh. K. Aben, Integral Photoelasticity [in Russian], Valgus, Tallin (1975).
M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1973).
V. S. Postnikov, Lectures on Optical Materials Engineering [in Russian], Izd. Perm. Nats. Issled. Politekhn. Universiteta, Perm’ (2013).
N. M. Belyaev, Resistance of Materials [in Russian], Al’yans, Moscow (2014).
GOST 24297–87. Receiving Inspection of Products. Basic Provisions [in Russian], Standartinform, Moscow (2009).
V. F. Solinov, Structural Optics [in Russian], Onebook.ru, Moscow (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Steklo i Keramika, No. 1, pp. 8 – 12, January, 2018.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dorofeev, D.S., Mashir, Y.I., Novoselov, A.I. et al. Analysis of the Correlation Between the Results of Destructive and Nondestructive Methods of Monitoring the Strength of Witness Samples After Ion-Hardening. Glass Ceram 75, 7–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-018-0018-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-018-0018-5