Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints from the old quasar APM 08279+5255 on two classes of Λ(t)-cosmologies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The viability of two different classes of Λ(t)CDM cosmologies is tested by using the APM 08279+5255, an old quasar at redshift z = 3.91. In the first class of models, the cosmological term scales as Λ(t) ~ R n. The particular case n = 0 describes the standard ΛCDM model whereas n = 2 stands for the Chen and Wu model. For an estimated age of 2 Gyr, it is found that the power index has a lower limit n > 0.21, whereas for 3 Gyr the limit is n > 0.6. Since n can not be so large as ~ 0.81, the ΛCDM and Chen and Wu models are also ruled out by this analysis. The second class of models is the one recently proposed by Wang and Meng which describes several Λ(t)CDM cosmologies discussed in the literature. By assuming that the true age is 2 Gyr it is found that the ε parameter satisfies the lower bound \(\epsilon > 0.11\) , while for 3 Gyr, a lower limit of \(\epsilon > 0.52\) is obtained. Such limits are slightly modified when the baryonic component is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perlmutter S. (1999). ApJ 517: 565

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Riess A. (1998). Astron. J. 116: 1009

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Padmanabhan T. (2003). Phys. Rep. 380: 235

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Peebles P.J.E., Ratra B. (2003). Rev. Mod. Phys. 75: 559

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lima J.A.S. (2004). Braz. J. Phys. 34: 194

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinberg S. (1989). Rev. Mod. Phys. 61: 1

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahni V., Starobinsky A.A. (2000). IJMPD 9: 373

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozer M., Taha O. (1987). Nucl. Phys. B 287: 776

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Freese K. (1987). Nucl. Phys. B 287: 797

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho J.C., Lima J.A.S., Waga I. (1992). Phys. Rev. D 46: 2404

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lima J.A.S., Maia J.M.F. (1994). Phys. Rev. D 49: 5597

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lima J.A.S., Trodden M. (1996). Phys. Rev. D 53: 4280

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lima J.A.S. (1996). Phys. Rev. D 54: 2571

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Overduin J.M., Cooperstock F.I. (1998). Phys. Rev. D 58: 043506

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunha J.V. (2002). A&A 390: 809

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunha J.V., Lima J.A.S., Alcaniz J.S. (2002). Phys. Rev. D 66: 023520

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cunha J.V., Santos R.C. (2004). Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13: 1321

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Camara C.S. (2004). Phys. Rev. D 69: 123504

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertolami O. (1986). Nuovo Cim. B 93: 36

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alcaniz J.S., Lima J.A.S. (1999). ApJ 521: L87

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alcaniz J.S., Lima J.A.S. (2001). ApJ 550: L133

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lima J.A.S., Alcaniz J.S. (2000). MNRAS 317: 893

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sethi G., Dev A., Jain D. (2005). Phys. Lett. B 624: 135

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jain D., Dev A. (2006). Phys. Lett. B 633: 436

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen W., Wu Y.-S. (1990). Phys. Rev. D 41: 695

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang P., Meng X.-H. (2005). Class. Quantum Grav. 22: 283

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hasinger G., Schartel N., Komossa S. (2002). ApJ 573: L77

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Friaça A., Alcaniz J.S., Lima J.A.S. (2005). MNRAS 362: 1295

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sisteró R.F. (1991). GRG 23: 1265

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lima J.A.S., Maia J.M.F. (1993). Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8: 591

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matyjasek J. (1995). Phys. Rev. D 51: 4154

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bennett C.L. (2003). ApJ. Suppl. 148: 175

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Freedman W.L. (2001). ApJ 553: 47

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alcaniz J.S., Lima J.A.S., Cunha J.V. (2003). MNRAS 340: L39

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Alcaniz J.S., Lima J.A.S. (2005). Phys. Rev. D 72: 063516

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. F. Jesus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jesus, J.F. Constraints from the old quasar APM 08279+5255 on two classes of Λ(t)-cosmologies. Gen Relativ Gravit 40, 791–798 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0533-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0533-0

Keywords

Navigation