Skip to main content
Log in

The nearly Newtonian regime in non-linear theories of gravity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper reconsiders the Newtonian limit of models of modified gravity including higher order terms in the scalar curvature in the gravitational action. This was studied using the Palatini variational principle in Meng and Wang (Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 1947 (2004)) and Domínguez and Barraco (Phys. Rev. D 70, 043505 (2004)) with contradicting results. Here a different approach is used, and problems in the previous attempts are pointed out. It is shown that models with negative powers of the scalar curvature, like the ones used to explain the present accelerated expansion, as well as their generalization which include positive powers, can give the correct Newtonian limit, as long as the coefficients of these powers are reasonably small. Some consequences of the performed analysis seem to raise doubts for the way the Newtonian limit was derived in the purely metric approach of fourth order gravity [Dick in Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 217 (2004)]. Finally, we comment on a recent paper [Olmo in Phys. Rev. D 72, 083505 (2005)] in which the problem of the Newtonian limit of both the purely metric and the Palatini formalism is discussed, using the equivalent Brans–Dicke theory, and with which our results partly disagree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Supernova Search Team Collaboration, Riess G.A., et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration, Perlmutter, S., et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tonry J.L. et al. (2003) Cosmological results from high-z supernovae. Astrophys. J. 594, 1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett C.L. et al. (2003) First-Year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boomerang Collaboration, Netterfield, C.B., et al. A measurement by BOOMERANG of multiple peaks in the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background. Astrophys. J. 571, 604 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halverson N.W. et al. (2002) Degree angular scale interferometer first results: a measurement of the cosmic microwave background angular power spectrum. Astrophys. J. 568, 38

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll S.M., Duvvuri V., Trodden M., Turner M.S. (2004) Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics? Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nojiri S., Odintsov S. (2003) Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of curvature: Unification of inflation and cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Starobinsky A.A. (1980) A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity. Phys. Lett. B 91, 99

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vollick D.N. (2003) 1/R curvature corrections as the source of the cosmological acceleration. Phys. Rev. D 68, 063510

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wald R.M. (1984) General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiba T. (2003) 1/R gravity and scalar–tensor gravity. Phys. Lett. B 575, 1

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolgov A.D., Kawasaki M. (2003) Can modified gravity explain accelerated cosmic expansion? Phys. Lett. B 573, 1

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng X., Wang P. (2003) Modified Friedmann equations in R −1-modified gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 20: 4949

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dick R. (2004) On the Newtonian limit in gravity models with inverse powers of R. Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 217

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng X., Wang P. (2004) Gravitational potential in the palatini formulation of modified gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 36: 1947

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Domínguez A.E., Barraco D.E. (2004) Newtonian limit of the singular f(R) gravity in the Palatini formalism. Phys. Rev. D 70, 043505

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olmo G.J. (2005) Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric and Palatini formalism. Phys. Rev. D 72, 083505

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olmo G.J. (2005) The Gravity Lagrangian according to solar system experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261102

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Allemandi G., Francaviglia M., Ruggiero M.L., Tartaglia A. (2005) Post-newtonian parameters from alternative theories of gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 37: 1891

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Capozziello S., Troisi A. (2005) Parametrized post-Newtonian limit of fourth order gravity inspired by scalar–tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. D 72, 044022

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Capozziello, S., Stabile, A., Troisi, A. Higher order gravity compatible with experimental constraints on Eddington parameters, arXiv: gr-qc/0603071 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P. Sotiriou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotiriou, T.P. The nearly Newtonian regime in non-linear theories of gravity. Gen Relativ Gravit 38, 1407–1417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0328-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0328-8

Keywords

Navigation