Comparison of SSRs and SNPs in assessment of genetic relatedness in maize
- 842 Downloads
Advances in high-throughput SNP genotyping and genome sequencing technologies have enabled genome-wide association mapping in dissecting the genetic basis of complex quantitative traits. In this study, 82 SSRs and 884 SNPs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) over 0.20 were used to compare their ability to assess population structure, principal component analysis (PCA) and relative kinship in a maize association panel consisting of 154 inbred lines. Compared to SNPs, SSRs provided more information on genetic diversity. The expected heterozygosity (He) of SSRs and SNPs averaged 0.65 and 0.44, and the polymorphic information content of these two markers was 0.61 and 0.34 in this panel, respectively. Additionally, SSRs performed better at clustering all lines into groups using STRUCTURE and PCA approaches, and estimating relative kinship. For both marker systems, the same clusters were observed based on PCA and the first two eigenvectors accounted for similar percentage of genetic variations in this panel. The correlation coefficients of each eigenvector from SSRs and SNPs decreased sharply when the eigenvector varied from 1 to 3, but kept around 0 when the eigenvector were over 3. The kinship estimates based on SSRs and SNPs were moderately correlated (r 2 = 0.69). All these results suggest that SSR markers with moderate density are more informative than SNPs for assessing genetic relatedness in maize association mapping panels.
KeywordsSSR SNP Population structure Kinship PCA
This research was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China.
- Aranzana MJ, Kim S, Zhao KY, Bakker E, Horton M, Jakob K, Lister C, Molitor J, Shindo C, Tang CL, Toomajian C, Traw B, Zheng HG, Bergelson J, Dean C, Marjoram P, Nordborg M (2005) Genome-wide association mapping in Arabidopsis identifies previously known flowering time and pathogen resistance genes. PLoS Genet 1(5):e60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chan EKF, Rowe HC, Kliebenstein DJ (2009) Understanding the evolution of defense metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana using genome-wide association mapping. Genetics 109:108522Google Scholar
- Clark RM, Schweikert G, Toomajian C, Ossowski S, Zeller G, Shinn P, Warthmann N, Hu TT, Fu G, Hinds DA, Chen H, Frazer KA, Huson DH, Schölkopf B, Nordborg M, Rätsch G, Ecker JR, Weige D (2007) Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317:338–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gore M, Chia JM, Elshire R, Ersoz E, Hurwitz B, Grills G, Ware D, Buckler ES (2009) A first generation haplotype map of the maize genome. In: The 51st maize genetics conference abstracts, p 39Google Scholar
- Myles S, Peiffer J, Brown PJ, Ersoz ES, Zhang ZW, Costich DE, Buckler ED (2009) Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell (http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.109.068437)
- Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Soft ware, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Song TM, Chen SJ (2004) Long term selection for oil concentration in five maize populations. Maydica 49:9–14Google Scholar
- Teng WT, Can JS, Chen YH, Liu XH, Jing XQ, Zhang FJ, Li JS (2004) Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China. Sci Agric Sin 37:1804–1811Google Scholar
- Wang SC, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2005) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5 user manual. North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar
- Yang XH, Yan JB, Zheng YP, Yu JM, Li JS (2007) Reviews of association analysis for quantitative traits in plant. Acta Agron Sin 33:523–530Google Scholar
- Yang XH, Yan JB, Shah T, Warburton ML, Li Q, Li L, Gao YF, Chai YC, Fu ZY, Zhou Y, Xu XT, Bai GH, Meng YJ, Zheng YP, Li JS (2010) Genetic analysis and characterization of a new maize association mapping panel for quantitative trait loci dissection. Theor Appl Genet 121:417–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar