, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 289–298 | Cite as

Life history trade-offs and response to selection on egg size in the polychaete worm Hydroides elegans

  • Cecelia M. Miles
  • Marta L. Wayne


In order to examine the genetic relationships among life-history traits in a hermaphroditic species we used artificial selection for increased egg size and measured correlated responses across the life cycle of the serpulid polychaete Hydroides elegans, a protandrous sequential hermaphrodite. We recorded sex ratios across generations, and measured egg size, egg energy, larval volume at two time points, juvenile tube length, adult dry weight and fecundity after selection. Selection for larger eggs produced positive correlated responses in egg energy, fecundity and larval size at competence. Selection for increased egg size was also manifested by earlier sex change and this resulted in selected individuals spending less time as males relative to controls. We propose that egg size is negatively correlated with duration of andromorphy, that is, that female fitness trades off with male fitness.


Artificial selection Correlated response Life-history evolution Hermaphrodite Trade-off 



Phenotypic standard deviation


Filtered seawater



We thank the generous faculty, staff, and students at Kewalo Marine Laboratory in Honolulu, HI, especially M.G. Hadfield, Director. S. Kelly measured many egg images and J. Scott provided technical assistance with larval video. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and K. Mendoza for constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript.


  1. Arcos FG, Racotta IS, Ibarra AM (2004) Genetic parameter estimates for reproductive traits and egg composition in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei. Aquaculture 236:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker K (1969) Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Neth J Zool 19:541–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell AE, Moore CH, Warren DC (1955) The evaluation of new methods for the improvement of quantitative characteristics. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20:197–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglund A (1986) Sex change by a polychaete: effects of social and reproductive costs. Ecology 67:837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berglund A (1990) Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage hypothesis: an experimental test. Anim Behav 39:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpizio-Ituarte E, Hadfield MG (1998) Stimulation of metamorphosis in the polychaete Hydroides elegans Haswell (Serpulidae). Biol Bull 194:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnov EL (1979a) Natural selection and sex change in Pandalid shrimp: a test of a life history theory. Am Nat 113:715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnov EL (1979b) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. Am Nat 113:465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Charnov EL (1986) Size advantage may not always favor sex change. J Theor Biol 119:283–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheverud JM (1984) Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J Theor Biol 110:155–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Czesak ME, Fox CW (2003) Evolutionary ecology of egg size and number in a seed beetle: genetic trade-off differs between environments. Evolution 57:1121–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ernande B, Clobert J, McCombie H et al (2003) Genetic polymorphism and trade-offs in early life-history strategy of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1795): a quantitative genetic study. J Evol Biol 16:399–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ernande B, Boudry P, Clobert J et al (2004) Plasticity in resource allocation based life history traits in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas I. Spatial variation in food abundance. J Evol Biol 17:342–356Google Scholar
  15. Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller RC, Baer CF, Travis J (2005) How and when selection experiments might actually be useful. Integr Comp Biol 45:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghiselin MT (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q Rev Biol 44:189–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gosselin LA, Qian P-Y (1999) Analysing energy content: a new micro-assay and an assessment of the applicability of acid dichromate assays. Hydrobiologia 390:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harshman LG, Hoffmann AA (2000) Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends Ecol Evol 15:32–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hilbish TJ, Winn EP, Rawson PD (1993) Genetic variation and covariation during larval and juvenile growth in Mercenaria mercenaria. Mar Biol 115:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iwasa Y (1991) Sex change evolution and cost of reproduction. Behav Ecol 2:56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarrett JN, Pechenik JA (1997) Temporal variation in cyprid quality and juvenile growth capacity for an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 78:1262–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lande R (1983) A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leigh EG, Charnov EL, Warner RR (1976) Sex ratio, sex change, and natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:3656–3660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leonardos N, Lucas IAN (2000) The nutritional value of algae grown under different culture conditions for Mytilus edulis L. larvae. Aquaculture 182:301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levin LA, Zhu J, Creed EL (1991) The genetic basis of life-history characters in a polychaete exhibiting planktotrophy and lecithotrophy. Evolution 45:380–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch M, Latta L, Hicks J et al (1998) Mutation, selection, and the maintenance of life history variation in a natural population. Evolution 52:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McEdward LR, Carson SF (1987) Variation in egg organic content and its relationship with egg size in the starfish Solaster stimpsoni. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miles CM, Hadfield MG, Wayne ML (2007) Estimates of heritability for egg size in the serpulid polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munday PL, Buston PM, Warner RR (2006) Diversity and flexibility of sex-change strategies in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 21:89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parsons PA (1964) Egg lengths in Drosophila melanogaster and correlated responses to selection. Genetica 35:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Pernet B, Jaeckle WB (2004) Size and organic content of eggs of marine annelids, and the underestimation of egg energy content by dichromate oxidation. Biol Bull 207:67–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Policansky D (1982) Sex change in plants and animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:471–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prevedelli D, N’Siala GM, Simonini R (2006) Gonochorism vs. hermaphroditism: relationship between life history and fitness in three species of Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta: Dorvilleidae) with different forms of sexuality. J Anim Ecol 75:203–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qian P-Y, Pechenik JA (1998) Effects of larval starvation and delayed metamorphosis on juvenile survival and growth of the tube-dwelling polychaete Hydroides elegans. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 227:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qiu J-W, Qian P-Y (1998) Combined effects of salinity and temperature on juvenile survival, growth and maturation in the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ranzoli F (1962) Il falso gonocorismo nel ciclo biologico del polichete Hydroides norvegica (Gunn.). Arch Zool 47:1–19Google Scholar
  39. Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose MR (1984a) Genetic covariation in Drosophila life history: untangling the data. Am Nat 123:565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose MR (1984b) Artificial selection on a fitness-component in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwarzkopf L, Blows MW, Caley MJ (1999) Life-history consequences of divergent selection on egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 29:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sella G, Lorenzi MC (2003) Increased sperm allocation delays body growth in a protandrous simultaneous hermaphrodite. Biol J Linn Soc 78:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seslija D, Tucic N (2003) Selection for developmental time in bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus): correlated responses for other life history traits and genetic architecture of line differentiation. Entomol Exp Appl 106:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sinervo B, Svensson E (1998) Mechanistic and selective causes of life history trade-offs and plasticity. Oikos 83:432–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Tucic N, Gliksman I, Seslija D et al (1998) Laboratory evolution of life-history traits in the bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus): the effects of selection on developmental time in populations with different previous history. Evolution 52:1713–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Unabia CRC, Hadfield MG (1999) Role of bacteria in larval settlement and metamorphosis of the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar Biol 133:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warner RR (1975) The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals. Am Nat 109:61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warner RR (1984) Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 38:148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations