, 133:235 | Cite as

Mapping functions



Accurate estimation of map distance between markers is important for the construction of large-scale linkage maps because it provides reliable and useful linkage information of markers on chromosomes. How to improve accuracy of estimating map distances depends on an appropriate mapping function. We used the coefficient of coincidence to integrate the Haldane function, in which crossovers are assumed to be independent and the Morgan function, in which crossovers are assumed to be interfered, and produce a new mapping function. The mapping function based on positive interference is referred to as the positive function and that on negative interference as the negative function. In these two mapping functions, map distances between loci are determined by both recombination frequencies and the coefficient of coincidence. We applied our mapping functions to four examples and show that our map estimates have much higher goodness-of-fit to the observed mapping data than the Haldane and Kosambi functions. Therefore, they can provide much more precise estimates of map distances than the two conventional mapping functions. Furthermore, our mapping functions produced almost linear (additive) map distances.


Map Function Linkage Recombination Coefficient of coincidence Map distance 



This study was supported by grant (39870568) from Natural Science Foundation of China and grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NS41466 and HL69126) to M. F. We thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions and also specially acknowledge Dr. W. J. Etges for his valuable revision suggestions on this paper.


  1. Amati P, Meselson M (1965) Localized negative interference in bacteriophage λ. Genetics 51:369–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Auger DL, Sheridan WF (2001) Negative interference in maize translocation heterozygotes. Genetics 159:1717–1726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey NTJ (1961) Introduction to the mathematical theory of genetic linkage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–148Google Scholar
  4. Beck B (1980) High negative interference and recombination in bacteriophage T5. Genetics 96:25–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowring FJ, Catcheside DEA (1999) Evidence for negative interference: clustering of crossovers close to the am locus in Neurospora crassa among am recombinants. Genetics 152:965–969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Broman KW, Weber JL (2000) Characterization of human interference. Am J Hum Genet 66:1911–1926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter TC, Falconer DS (1951) Stocks for detecting linkage in the mouse and the theory of their design. J Genet 50:307–323Google Scholar
  8. Cobbs G (1978) Renewal process approach to the theory of genetic linkage: case of no chromatid interference. Genetics 89:563–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis L, Smith GR (2006) The meiotic bouque promotes homolog interactions and restricts ectopic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 174:167–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doira H, Sakate S, Kihara H, Tamura T (1981) Genetical studies of the “mottled translucent of var” mutations in Bombyx mori. J Sericult Sci Jpn 50:185–189Google Scholar
  11. Esch E,Weber WE (2002) Investigation of interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using the coefficient of coincidence. Theor Appl Genet 104:786–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1979) A mathematically tractable family of genetic mapping functions with different amounts of interference. Genetics 91:769–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fogel S, Hurst DD, Mortimer RK (1971) Gene conversion in unselected tetrads from multipoint crosses. In: Kimber G, Redei G (eds) Stadler Genetics Symposia, vols 1 and 2. University of Missouri, Columbia MO, pp 89–110Google Scholar
  14. Foss ER, Lande F, Stahl W, Steinberg CM (1993) Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics 133:681–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox DP (1973) The control of chiasma distribution in the locust, Schistocera gregaria (Forskål). Chromosoma 43:289–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haldane JBS (1919) The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J Genet 8:299–309Google Scholar
  17. King JS, Mortimer RK (1990) A polymerization model of chiasma interference and corresponding computer simulation. Genetics 126:1127–1138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of the map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175Google Scholar
  19. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M J et al (1987) MapMaker: an interactive computer package for constructing genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu BH (1998) Statistical genomics: linkage, mapping, and QTL analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 322–324Google Scholar
  21. McPeek MS, Speed TP (1995) Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics 139:1031–1044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mortimer RK, Fogel S (1974) Genetical interference and gene conversion. In: Grell RF (ed) Mechanism in recombination. Plenum, New York, pp 263–275Google Scholar
  23. Muller HJ (1916) The mechanism of crossing-over. Am Nat 50:195–434Google Scholar
  24. Perkins DD (1962a) The frequency in Neurospora tetrads of multiply exchanges within short intervals. Genet Res 3:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perkins DD (1962b) Crossing-over and interference in a multiply marked chromosome arm of Neurospora. Genetics 47:1235–1274Google Scholar
  26. Qin J (1988) Genetical studies on the chocolate-2 in the silkworm, Bombyx mori: locus of the ch-2 gene, and the eighteenth linkage group in the silkworm. Sci Sericult 14:199–205Google Scholar
  27. Rao DC, Morton NE, Lindsten J, Hulten M, Yee S (1977) A map function for man. Hum Hered 27:99–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Soriano P, Keitger EA, Schorderet DF, Harbers K, Gartler SM, Jaenisch R (1987) High rate of recombination and double crossovers in the mouse pseudoautosomal region during male meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7218–7220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stahl FW, Foss HM, Young LS, Borts RH, Abdullah MFF, Copenhaver GP (2004) Does Interference Count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168:35–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stam P (1979) Interference in genetic crossing over and chromosome mapping. Genetics 92:573–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sturt E (1976) A map function for human chromosomes. Ann Hum Genet 40:147–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sturtevant AH (1915) The behavior of chromosomes as studied through linkage. Z Abstam Vererbung 13:234–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sturtevant AH, Bridge CB, Morgan TH (1919) The spatial relations of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 5:n168–n173Google Scholar
  34. Tan Y-D, Fu Y-X (2006) A novel method for estimating linkage maps. Genetics 173:2383–2390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan Y-D, Fu Y-X (2007) A new strategy for estimating recombination fractions between dominant markers from an F2 population. Genetics 175:923–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weeks DE, Lathrop GM, Ott J (1993) Multipoint mapping under genetic interference. Hum Hered 43:86–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weinstein A (1936) The theory of multiple-strand crossing over. Genetics 21:155–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodward DO, Woodward VW (1983) Concepts of molecular genetics—information flow in genetics and evolution. Chinese Version. Shanghai Science and technology Press, Shanghai, pp 157–175Google Scholar
  39. Zhao H, Speed TP, McPeek MS (1995a) Statistical analysis of interference using the chi-square model. Genetics 139:1045–1056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao H, McPeek MS, Speed TP (1995b) Statistical analysis of chromatid interference. Genetics 139:1057–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao H, McPeek MS (1996) On genetic map function. Genetics 142:1369–1377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zwick ME, Cutler DJ, Langley CH (1999) Classic weistein: tetrad analysis, genetic variation and achiasmate segration in Drosophila and humans. Genetics 152:1615–1629PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life ScienceHunan Normal UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular MedicineUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations