Glimpses of evolution: heterochromatic histone H3K9 methyltransferases left its marks behind
- 468 Downloads
In eukaryotes, histone methylation is an epigenetic mechanism associated with a variety of functions related to gene regulation or genomic stability. Recently analyzed H3K9 methyltransferases (HMTases) as SUV39H1, Clr4p, DIM-5, Su(var)3-9 or SUVH2 are responsible for the establishment of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation (H3K9me), which is intimately connected with heterochromatinization. In this review, available data will be evaluated concerning (1) the phylogenetic distribution of H3K9me as heterochromatin-specific histone modification and its evolutionary stability in relation to other epigenetic marks, (2) known families of H3K9 methyltransferases, (3) their responsibility for the formation of constitutive heterochromatin and (4) the evolution of Su(var)3-9-like and SUVH-like H3K9 methyltransferases. Compilation and parsimony analysis reveal that histone H3K9 methylation is, next to histone deacetylation, the evolutionary most stable heterochromatic mark, which is established by at least two subfamilies of specialized heterochromatic HMTases in almost all studied eukaryotes.
KeywordsCladistic analysis Clr4p DIM-5 H3K9 methyltransferases Heterochromatin Histone methylation Molecular evolution Su(var)3-9 SUV39H1 SUVH2
I would like to thank Dr Gunter Reuter for critical reading of the manuscript. I gratefully acknowledge the sequencing of the yet unpublished genomes of Coprinus cinereus, Rhizopus oryzae, Nematostella vectensis, Acropora millepora, Hydra magnipapillata, Schistosoma mansoni, Aplysia californica, Pediculus humanus, Nasonia vitripennis, Tribolium castaneum and Trichinella spiralis. Research on evolution of Su(var)3-9-like proteins herein was funded by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
- Aagaard L, Laible G, Selenko P, Schmid M, Dorn R, Schotta G, Kuhfittig S, Wolf A, Lebersorger A, Singh PB, Reuter G, Jenuwein T (1999) Functional mammalian homologues of the Drosophila PEV modifier Su(var)3-9 encode centromere-associated proteins which complex with the heterochromatin component M31. EMBO J 18(7):1923–1938PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baumbusch LO, Thorstensen T, Krauss V, Fischer A, Naumann K, Assalkhou R, Schulz I, Reuter G, Aalen RB (2001) The Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains at least 29 active genes encoding SET domain proteins that can be assigned to four evolutionarily conserved classes. Nucleic Acids Res 29(21):4319–4333PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cowell IG, Aucott R, Mahadevaiah SK, Burgoyne PS, Huskisson N, Bongiorni S, Prantera G, Fanti L, Pimpinelli S, Wu R, Gilbert DM, Shi W, Fundele R, Morrison H, Jeppesen P, Singh PB (2002) Heterochromatin, HP1 and methylation at lysine 9 of histone H3 in animals. Chromosoma 111(1):22–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heitz E (1928) Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb Wiss Bot 69:762–818Google Scholar
- Krauss V, Fassl A, Fiebig P, Patties I, Sass H (2006) The evolution of the histone methyltransferase gene Su(var)3-9 in metazoans includes a fusion with and a re-fission from a functionally unrelated gene. BMC Evol Biol 6:e18Google Scholar
- Maddison D, Maddison W (2005) MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.08. Sinauer associates, Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Peters AH, O’Carroll D, Scherthan H, Mechtler K, Sauer S, Schofer C, Weipoltshammer K, Pagani M, Lachner M, Kohlmaier A, Opravil S, Doyle M, Sibilia M, Jenuwein T (2001) Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107(3):323–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Regev A, Lamb MJ, Jablonka E (1998) The role of DNA methylation in invertebrates: developmental regulation or genome defense? Mol Biol Evol 15(7):880–891Google Scholar
- Reuter G, Fischer A, Hofmann I (2005) Heterochromatin and the control of gene silencing in plants. In: Meyer P (ed) Plant epigenetics (annual plant reviews 19). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 106–133Google Scholar
- Swofford DL (2002) PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer associates, Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar