Abstract
This paper seeks to focus on the way in which land transformation related to the grabbing process are directly involved in people’s livelihoods and life projects. We use the term territorial grabbing instead of green grabbing (or just land grabbing), because even though the case that we illustrate in our work can be describe as a green grab, we make a call for the necessity of a comprehensive analysis of the socio-spatial implications that polices such as the governmental environmental conservation agenda can implicate for individuals and communities in terms of impacts, influences, and [re]significations of their territories and territorialities. Therefore, our objective is to go beyond the discussion on the appropriation of land and resources for environmental purposes (and therefore the discussion of land dynamics in relation to globalization, foreign investment, markets liberalization, violence, and control) to bring also into the debate the diverse socio-spatial implications and meanings that create a geographical imagination capable of having profound influences on the way in which people and groups understand their place in the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a legally binding international treaty with three main objectives: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological diversity genetic resources. Its general objective is to promote measures that lead to a sustainable future. The governing body of the CBD is the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This supreme authority of all Governments (or Parties) that have ratified the treaty meets every 2 years to review progress, set priorities and adopt work plans.
Narrow country road through which animals are passing through.
The permit to grant water corresponds to an authorization granted by an environmental authority, in this case Natural National Parks of Colombia for the collection, use and consumption of water within a National Park to an applicant.
References
Borras, S., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies,33(4), 402–416.
Borras, S., Kay, S., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2013). Acaparamiento de tierras y acumulación capitalista: aspectos clave en América Latina. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Agrario,38, 75–103.
Cernea, M. (1999). The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Corson, C., & MacDonald, K. (2012). Enclosing the global commons: The convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. Journal of Peasant Studies,39(2), 263–283.
Cotula, L., Dyer, N., & Vermeulen, S. (2008). Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York: Routledge.
Edelman, M., Oya, C., & Borras, S. (2013). Global land grabs: Historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly,34(9), 1517–1531.
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies,39(2), 237–261.
Fajardo, D. (1996). Orinoquía: Colonización, frontera y estructuración territorial. Bogotá, DC: Fondo FEN.
FAO. (2000). The state of food and agriculture 2000. Rome: FAO.
Filer, C. (2012). Why green grabs don’t work in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Peasant Studies,39, 599–617.
Gómez, C., Sánchez-Ayala, L., & Vargas, G. (2015). Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: Micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in between. Journal of Peasant Studies,42(2), 255–274.
Grajales, J. (2011). The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies,38(4), 771–792.
Grajales, J. (2013). State involvement, land grabbing and counter-insurgency in Colombia. Development and Change,44(2), 211–232.
Hall, D., Hirsh, P., & Li, T. (2011). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in South East Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Li, T. (2014). What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,39, 589–602.
McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies,39(3–4), 681–701.
Mejía, M. (1999). Economic dimensions of urban resettlement: Experiences from Latin America. In M. Cernea (Ed.), The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges (pp. 147–188). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Paasi, A. (2003). Territory. In A. John, M. Katharyne, T. Gerard (Eds.), En a companion to political geography (pp. 109–120). Oxford: Blackwell.
Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia. (Noviembre 2004). Documento de Declaratoria para la Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales.
Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. http://www.parquesnacionales.gov.co.
Peluso, N. L. (2012). What’s nature got to do with it? A situated historical perspective on socionatural commodities. Development and Change,42, 79–104.
Peluso, N., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasants Studies,38(4), 667–681.
Robertson, B., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2010). Global land acquisition: Neo-colonialism or development opportunity? Food Security,2, 271–283.
Saeed, H., & Parmentier, S. (2017). When rabbits are in charge of carrots: Land grabbing, transitional justice and economic-state crime in Afghanistan. State Crime Journal,6(1), 13–36.
Sánchez-Ayala, L., & Arango-López, C. (2016). Geografías de la Movilidad: Perspectivas desde Colombia. Bogotá: Uniandes.
Vidal, J. (2008). The great green land grab. The Guardian, 13 de febrero de 2008. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/13/conservation.
Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies,37, 429–447.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Universidad de los Andes and the Alexander von Humboldt Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
Our work involved human participants. Therefore, we declare that informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Likewise, all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of the Universidad de los Andes, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchez-Ayala, L., Areiza-Tapias, A. Conservation and people’s livelihoods in Colombia. GeoJournal 84, 1429–1445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9929-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9929-5